Matt Baldree wrote:
>>4) I needed the system as a whole to be proxy-based in order to do
>>memorymanagement with object caches. Since AspectJ works on regular
>>classes that wouldn't work (AFAIK).
>
> You can advise objects as well.
Hm.. not sure what this has to do with my 4 point. What I meant
see below.
- Original Message -
From: "Rickard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matt Baldree" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Christoph Kiehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Webwork-use
Matt Baldree wrote:
> What are you using instead of Aspect and why did you decide not to use it?
What I'm using is already answered in other posts, but why I didn't use
it is for the following reasons:
1) the need for a proprietary compiler
2) the somewhat unwieldy language extensions in AspectJ
What are you using instead of Aspect and why did you decide not to use it?
- Original Message -
From: "Rickard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Christoph Kiehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 4:22 AM
Subject:
Hi Rickard
>WATKIN-JONES,ADAM (HP-UnitedKingdom,ex1) wrote:
>> I'm delurking to ask what is surely a daft question but here goes: if not
>> AspectJ, then what AOP toolkit are you using?
>>
>> (Obvious answer: having super programming-chops, you've written an AOP kit
>> yourself! In which case,
WATKIN-JONES,ADAM (HP-UnitedKingdom,ex1) wrote:
> I'm delurking to ask what is surely a daft question but here goes: if not
> AspectJ, then what AOP toolkit are you using?
>
> (Obvious answer: having super programming-chops, you've written an AOP kit
> yourself! In which case, is this something
>> ps. and instead of EJB we're using AOP which makes the app really
>> ultracool, but that's another story..
> AOP ???
sorry, didnt read your explanation in time...
---
greetings from
Marc Logemann
Homebase @ www.logemann.info
---
This sf
Hi!
I'm delurking to ask what is surely a daft question but here goes: if not
AspectJ, then what AOP toolkit are you using?
(Obvious answer: having super programming-chops, you've written an AOP kit
yourself! In which case, is this something you may put into the public
domain!?)
Just curious.
> ps. and instead of EJB we're using AOP which makes the app really
> ultracool, but that's another story..
AOP ???
---
greetings from
Marc Logemann
Homebase @ www.logemann.info
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Two, two, TWO
Christoph Kiehl wrote:
>>ps. and instead of EJB we're using AOP which makes the app really
>>ultracool, but that's another story..
>
> What is AOP? ;)
Aspect Oriented Programming. The "next big thing" as they say. Been
using it for a couple of weeks now (no, I'm not using AspectJ) and I
never
Hi Rickard,
> ps. and instead of EJB we're using AOP which makes the app really
> ultracool, but that's another story..
What is AOP? ;)
Greetings
Christph
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Two, two, TWO treats in one.
http:/
Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
> Ok - so if you're on this list you probably don't need convincing, but I
> should post it anyway :)
>
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0107789/stories/2002/07/09/whyILikeWebwork.html
Good stuff! Really well written, and actually quite balanced :-)
After a long break from
Ok - so if you're on this list you probably don't need convincing, but I
should post it anyway :)
http://radio.weblogs.com/0107789/stories/2002/07/09/whyILikeWebwork.html
Enjoy.
-mike
--
ATLASSIAN - http://www.atlassian.com
Expert J2EE Software, Services and Support
---
13 matches
Mail list logo
