Perhaps look at this upside down.
If you were the elderly person and participated in the program only to
find out that your PHI had been disclosed, likely you would go after the
pharmacist first but also the group that facilitated this program since
they were the ones to select this pharmacist and
Jo,
quite so.
I would lkie to call an
entity that would be a CE if they did a single electronic transaction that a
standard has been established for a "Potential Covered Entity" (PCE) and avoid
all the repeated verbiage.
Any takers?
The opinions expressed here are my own and not necessarily
Medicare reimburses for the "Bad Debt" of providers, under certain circumstances,
subject to a cost report audit. SEE CFR 412.115(a) and CFR 413.80.I think it is
mostly deductibles and coinsurance. So that the provider is held harmless to
revenue loss by the failure of benes to pay th
I would like to know how the privacy & security act under HIPAA will impact our
current systems today? I support POS card/swipe machines that dialup (via an
async/sync modem) over the public telephone system into a server that is
connected to a private network. These machines (terminals) are locate
This letter linked to this e-mail is interesting, I am sure many providers
are struggling with this same issue. But I think the relevant question is do
medical vendors really provide treatment (by HIPAA definition), therefore
exempting this use/disclosure from a BA agreement? I have the definition
Richard,
The first question is: Is what is being transmitted Protected
Healthcare Information? If not all the rest is moot. If what is
being transmitted is strictly the financial data (This merchant charged this
person this much), it probably isn't PHI, but just money.
If it is you must d
I have two questions regarding amendment of the medical/billing record. 1. Do we
have to amend info kept prior to the deadline? (The disclosure log specifically says
you do not, but nothing on the amendment. What about all those places that have info
on microfilm?) and 2. When a patient ca
I don't see these POS terminals being affected by HIPAA if in fact
they are doing a financial transaction...ie patient is making a
payment for services rendered(paying the co-pay with a credit card).
Now, there is a network of POS terminals that do eligibility checks
and referrals etc..these termi
The Transactions that these POS terminals will be supporting are HealthCare
transactions - 270/271, 277/275, 835, 837 etc...
Where can I find more information about the TCS rule?
Thanks,
Richard
-Original Message-
From: Catherine Lohmeier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, Februar
Catherine,
Just a clarification. These non-financial POS terminals would
have to use standard transactions (such as 270/271, 278, etc.) to do their job
when a standard is available.
The opinions expressed here are my own and not necessarily the opinion of
LCMH.
Douglas M. WebbComputer Sys
Richard,
http://www.wpc-edi.com
has all the Implimentation Guides and Addenda available for
download.
The big thing is that if there is a 004010-series IG for what
you're doing, you have to use it, and any provider who uses one of your
terminals is a Covered Entity, and subject to the ful
Douglas,
I recently participated in the development of Internet-based online systems with a major health plan. It should be noted that there may be a qualification regarding the requirement to use standard transactions (such as 270/271, 278, etc.) with online systems, i.e. the format portion of t
Patricia,
1) It depends what you say in your NPP, but HIPAA does not mandate that a CE
include past information (i.e., PHI created prior to the compliance date)
2) HIPAA does NOT require a "written" request from the individual
I hope that this helps.
Your questions are always welcome.
Matt
What about the card swipes that we use when a patient makes a payment on
their account using their credit card. Yes, we only swipe the card and put
in the last four digits of the number, but the patient name (or whoever owns
the card) prints out on the receipt.
Is that considered PHI, even tho
AT&T
Government Solutions Awarded $3.5 Million Contract by FTC to Develop And Implement 'Do Not Call' Registry Consumer Registration
Expected This Summer
VIENNA,
Va., Feb 26, 2003 /PRNewswire-FirstCall via COMTEX/
-- AT&T Government Solutions announced today it has been awarded a $3.5
m
Doug,
This is another example of the daunting
enforcement task CMS has. There are so
many interconnected issues that have no clear resolution. Somebody should calculate the cost of the
lack of clarity of HIPAA.
Regards,
David Frenkel
Business Development
GEFEG USA
Global Le
16 matches
Mail list logo