Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 07 of October 2003 12:08, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
>> Thanks!
>
> btw. looking into test4 I see that autoconf conception is used in
> weird way. Normally aclocal.m4 is autogenerated by aclocal command
"Normally" only if you're also using A
On Tuesday 07 of October 2003 12:08, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> Thanks!
btw. looking into test4 I see that autoconf conception is used in weird way.
Normally aclocal.m4 is autogenerated by aclocal command (and it includes
sources of macros from /usr/share/autoconf/autoconf/*.m4 and from local
acinc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin v. Löwis) writes:
> Hrvoje Niksic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> > VERSION = ('[.0-9]+-?b[0-9]+'
>> >'|[.0-9]+-?dev[0-9]+'
>> >'|[.0-9]+-?pre[0-9]+'
>> >'|[.0-9]+-?rel[0-9]+'
>> >'|[.0-9]+[a-z]?'
>> >'|[0-9][0-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin v. Löwis) writes:
> Why do you think the scheme is narrow-minded?
Because "1.9-beta3" seems to be a problem.
> VERSION = ('[.0-9]+-?b[0-9]+'
>'|[.0-9]+-?dev[0-9]+'
>'|[.0-9]+-?pre[0-9]+'
>'|[.0-9]+-?rel[0-9]+'
>'|[.0-9]+[a
Karl Eichwalder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I guess, you as the wget maintainer switched from something
> supported to the unsupported "betaX" scheme and now we have
> something to talk about ;)
I had no idea that something as usual as "betaX" was unsupported. In
fact, I believe that "bX" was
Karl Eichwalder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hrvoje Niksic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Ouch. Why does the robot care about version names at all?
>
> It must know about the sequences; this is important for merging
> issues. IIRC, we have at least these sequences supported by the
> robot:
>
Karl Eichwalder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hrvoje Niksic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I'm not sure what "b3" is, but the version in the POT file was
>> supposed to be "beta3". Was there a misunderstanding somewhere along
>> the line?
>
> Yes, the robot does not like beta3 as part of the ve
Karl Eichwalder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Also, my Croatian translation of 1.9 doesn't seem to have made it
>> in. Is that expected?
>
> Unfortunately, yes. Will you please resubmit it with the subject line
> updated (IIRC, it's now):
>
> TP-Robot wget-1.9-b3.hr.po
I'm not sure what "b
Karl Eichwalder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hrvoje Niksic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> As for the Polish translation, translations are normally handled
>> through the Translation Project. The TP robot is currently down, but
>> I assume it will be back up soon, and then we'll submit the POT
Thanks!
Hrvoje Niksic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As for the Polish translation, translations are normally handled
> through the Translation Project. The TP robot is currently down, but
> I assume it will be back up soon, and then we'll submit the POT file
> and update the translations /en masse/.
It
Thanks for the contribution. Note that a slightly more correct place
to send the patch is the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> list, followed by
people with a keener interest in development.
Also, you should send at least a short explanation of what each patch
is supposed to do and why one should apply it. (
Hi,
Here is few patches against test3:
http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/SOURCES/wget-ac.patch?rev=1.4
(some autoconf 2.5x things)
http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/SOURCES/wget-pl.patch?rev=1.3
(Polish translation update)
--
Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczCS at FoE, Wroclaw University of
13 matches
Mail list logo
