Re: Packaging our releases

2007-01-24 Thread Jean-Baptiste Quenot
* Ingo Adler: > I'm not using Maven. I use Ant and Ivy. Me too. And I'd love to see Wicket using the successful combo, but this is not (yet) the case of others[1]. > I like the wicket-all idea. One version - one distribution - one > download. > > First step: I create (or copy) an IntelliJ p

Re: Packaging our releases

2007-01-24 Thread Ingo Adler
Hi, I'm not using Maven. I use Ant and Ivy. I like the wicket-all idea. One version - one distribution - one download. First step: I create (or copy) an IntelliJ project with modules over the extracted distribution. So I can navigate through the source, the samples and the rest. The web site

Re: [jira] Commented: (WICKET-235) clean up info on site

2007-01-24 Thread Igor Vaynberg
consider yourself bugged! -igor On 1/24/07, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Igor Vaynberg wrote: > so lets, who do we bug to do that? I don't really know how to do it at this point, but I guess you could bug me. Upayavira

Re: [jira] Commented: (WICKET-235) clean up info on site

2007-01-24 Thread Upayavira
Igor Vaynberg wrote: so lets, who do we bug to do that? I don't really know how to do it at this point, but I guess you could bug me. Upayavira

Re: [jira] Commented: (WICKET-235) clean up info on site

2007-01-24 Thread Igor Vaynberg
so lets, who do we bug to do that? -igor On 1/24/07, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Igor Vaynberg wrote: > umm, but we have a wiki, we dont need to redirect to wicket.apache.orgbut > to apache.org/confluence/whateverstaticexportwhatchamaggicit During incubation, our Apache site is incu

Re: [jira] Commented: (WICKET-235) clean up info on site

2007-01-24 Thread Upayavira
Igor Vaynberg wrote: umm, but we have a wiki, we dont need to redirect to wicket.apache.org but to apache.org/confluence/whateverstaticexportwhatchamaggicit During incubation, our Apache site is incubator.apache.org/wicket. We can sync Confluence into that. Regards, Upayavira On 1/24/07,

Re: [jira] Commented: (WICKET-235) clean up info on site

2007-01-24 Thread Igor Vaynberg
umm, but we have a wiki, we dont need to redirect to wicket.apache.org but to apache.org/confluence/whateverstaticexportwhatchamaggicit -igor On 1/24/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Because we are still not officially landed on apache. Same argument for the user list. Martijn

Re: [jira] Commented: (WICKET-235) clean up info on site

2007-01-24 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Because we are still not officially landed on apache. Same argument for the user list. Martijn On 1/24/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: if we already have the site there, then why are we still hosting it on sf.net? -igor On 1/24/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

Re: [jira] Commented: (WICKET-235) clean up info on site

2007-01-24 Thread Igor Vaynberg
if we already have the site there, then why are we still hosting it on sf.net? -igor On 1/24/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -100 We already have the site up on apache: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKETxSITE Martijn On 1/24/07, Eelco Hillenius (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: [jira] Commented: (WICKET-235) clean up info on site

2007-01-24 Thread Eelco Hillenius
You might want to subtract 2 more if you want to win this :) Eelco On 1/24/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -100 We already have the site up on apache: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKETxSITE Martijn On 1/24/07, Eelco Hillenius (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [ https://

Re: [jira] Commented: (WICKET-235) clean up info on site

2007-01-24 Thread Martijn Dashorst
-100 We already have the site up on apache: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKETxSITE Martijn On 1/24/07, Eelco Hillenius (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12467112

Re: adding a listener to the AjaxRequestTarget

2007-01-24 Thread Vincent Demay
Ok it is done you could find a patch on jira : http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-234 Thanks for your help Igor Igor Vaynberg a écrit : wonderful :) -igor On 1/24/07, Vincent Demay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Igor Vaynberg a écrit : > On 1/24/07, Vincent Demay <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: adding a listener to the AjaxRequestTarget

2007-01-24 Thread Igor Vaynberg
wonderful :) -igor On 1/24/07, Vincent Demay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Igor Vaynberg a écrit : > On 1/24/07, Vincent Demay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > if you _do_ need it to be called _during_ the rendering then we will >> > have to >> > extract an interface from the target that only h

Re: adding a listener to the AjaxRequestTarget

2007-01-24 Thread Vincent Demay
Igor Vaynberg a écrit : On 1/24/07, Vincent Demay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > if you _do_ need it to be called _during_ the rendering then we will > have to > extract an interface from the target that only has prependjavascript() > and > you will only get that in the listener instead of the ta

Re: adding a listener to the AjaxRequestTarget

2007-01-24 Thread Igor Vaynberg
On 1/24/07, Vincent Demay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > if you _do_ need it to be called _during_ the rendering then we will > have to > extract an interface from the target that only has prependjavascript() > and > you will only get that in the listener instead of the target itself. you means ap

Re: adding a listener to the AjaxRequestTarget

2007-01-24 Thread Vincent Demay
Igor Vaynberg a écrit : do you really think it is necessary to call the listener for each component rendered? why not IAjaxResponseListener { beforeResponse(map, target); } the problem i see with callbacks during the render is that target.prependjavascript will no longer have any effect and