* Ingo Adler:
> I'm not using Maven. I use Ant and Ivy.
Me too. And I'd love to see Wicket using the successful combo,
but this is not (yet) the case of others[1].
> I like the wicket-all idea. One version - one distribution - one
> download.
>
> First step: I create (or copy) an IntelliJ p
Hi,
I'm not using Maven. I use Ant and Ivy.
I like the wicket-all idea. One version - one distribution - one download.
First step: I create (or copy) an IntelliJ project with modules over the
extracted distribution. So I can navigate through the source, the
samples and the rest. The web site
consider yourself bugged!
-igor
On 1/24/07, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> so lets, who do we bug to do that?
I don't really know how to do it at this point, but I guess you could
bug me.
Upayavira
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
so lets, who do we bug to do that?
I don't really know how to do it at this point, but I guess you could
bug me.
Upayavira
so lets, who do we bug to do that?
-igor
On 1/24/07, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> umm, but we have a wiki, we dont need to redirect to wicket.apache.orgbut
> to apache.org/confluence/whateverstaticexportwhatchamaggicit
During incubation, our Apache site is incu
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
umm, but we have a wiki, we dont need to redirect to wicket.apache.org but
to apache.org/confluence/whateverstaticexportwhatchamaggicit
During incubation, our Apache site is incubator.apache.org/wicket. We
can sync Confluence into that.
Regards, Upayavira
On 1/24/07,
umm, but we have a wiki, we dont need to redirect to wicket.apache.org but
to apache.org/confluence/whateverstaticexportwhatchamaggicit
-igor
On 1/24/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Because we are still not officially landed on apache. Same argument
for the user list.
Martijn
Because we are still not officially landed on apache. Same argument
for the user list.
Martijn
On 1/24/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
if we already have the site there, then why are we still hosting it on
sf.net?
-igor
On 1/24/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
if we already have the site there, then why are we still hosting it on
sf.net?
-igor
On 1/24/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-100
We already have the site up on apache: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKETxSITE
Martijn
On 1/24/07, Eelco Hillenius (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You might want to subtract 2 more if you want to win this :)
Eelco
On 1/24/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-100
We already have the site up on apache: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKETxSITE
Martijn
On 1/24/07, Eelco Hillenius (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [
https://
-100
We already have the site up on apache: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKETxSITE
Martijn
On 1/24/07, Eelco Hillenius (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12467112
Ok it is done you could find a patch on jira :
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-234
Thanks for your help Igor
Igor Vaynberg a écrit :
wonderful :)
-igor
On 1/24/07, Vincent Demay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Igor Vaynberg a écrit :
> On 1/24/07, Vincent Demay <[EMAIL PROTECTED
wonderful :)
-igor
On 1/24/07, Vincent Demay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Igor Vaynberg a écrit :
> On 1/24/07, Vincent Demay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > if you _do_ need it to be called _during_ the rendering then we will
>> > have to
>> > extract an interface from the target that only h
Igor Vaynberg a écrit :
On 1/24/07, Vincent Demay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if you _do_ need it to be called _during_ the rendering then we will
> have to
> extract an interface from the target that only has prependjavascript()
> and
> you will only get that in the listener instead of the ta
On 1/24/07, Vincent Demay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if you _do_ need it to be called _during_ the rendering then we will
> have to
> extract an interface from the target that only has prependjavascript()
> and
> you will only get that in the listener instead of the target itself.
you means ap
Igor Vaynberg a écrit :
do you really think it is necessary to call the listener for each
component
rendered?
why not
IAjaxResponseListener { beforeResponse(map, target); }
the problem i see with callbacks during the render is that
target.prependjavascript will no longer have any effect and
16 matches
Mail list logo