您好!
腾达实业有限公司因进项较多,每月有部分结余发票可优惠对外代开.
普通发票,运输发票(税率0.8%-1.5%左右).增值发票(税率6%左右),可验证
后付款.
联系电话:13927434328(张先生)
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile medi
Yeah, I noticed that as I looked more in the AuthenticatedWebApp class that it really doesn't do much, but the fact of the matter is that I have to copy code over to my class. However, what happens if there is another WebApp class that is useful in the future but I'm already extending the SpringWe
Gwyn,Yeah, someone made that comment, and I actually meant ##wicket (that's where I hang, anyway). It was just a typo and I forgot to change it. It's fixed now.Thanks.
On 3/9/06, Gwyn Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi - Nice writeup. One thing is that the IRC channel most seem tohang out on is
The distracting thing here is the way AuthenticatedWebApplication is
implemented. It's elegant by itself, but as you noticed not very
useful if you want to use it together with another base class.
The only thing that application does though, is register itself as
IRoleCheckingStrategy and IUnautho
Hi - Nice writeup. One thing is that the IRC channel most seem to
hang out on is "##wicket", not "#wicket" (Dont't ask...)
/Gwyn
On 09/03/06, Guillermo Castro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Feast your eyes (and share your comments) on the article I wrote about
> Wicket:
>
> http://j
Ok,So we all know that a class in Java cannot extend multiple classes, so because of this there is no way to have extend the AuthenticatedWebApplication and the SpringWebApplication classes for a single app. So, does this mean I have to copy the code of one of them into my class which only extends
this is a change. due to our partial render and ajax implementations the components now have to be 1:1 between java and markup.-IgorOn 3/9/06,
Jerry Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I had a page in 1.1 along the lines of.add(new Label("label", "some text"));In the html I had
In 1.2 it breaks w
I had a page in 1.1 along the lines of
.add(new Label("label", "some text"));
In the html I had
.
.
.
.
In 1.2 it breaks with:
wicket.markup.MarkupException: The component [Component id = label, page
= test.HomePage, path = 0:label.Label, isVisible = true, isVersioned =
true] has the same w
It was published on the announcements forum, which is not moderated.
This means that it is quick on the front page, but in the fine print,
and disappears quite quickly as well.
Martijn
On 3/9/06, Guillermo Castro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.javalobby.org/java/forums/t65452.html
>
> I
no problem at all, thats why we are here. and glad you are enjoying it :)-IgorOn 3/9/06, Jerry Smith <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I couldn't reproduce it in a
distilled project. The problem turned up in a model. Sorry for wasting your
time, Igor, and thanks for a really nice framewo
http://www.javalobby.org/java/forums/t65452.htmlI don't think it made the front page, though @P-)Ok, enough about me...
On 3/9/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Where's the javalobby thread?On 3/9/06, Guillermo Castro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> And I forgot JavaLobby, but you took car
it is on the announcements, at the right top. It is now off the front page.
Martijn
On 3/9/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where's the javalobby thread?
>
> On 3/9/06, Guillermo Castro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And I forgot JavaLobby, but you took care of that for me. Thanks
Where's the javalobby thread?
On 3/9/06, Guillermo Castro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And I forgot JavaLobby, but you took care of that for me. Thanks! @B-)
>
> Now, to create a real web app using wicket...
>
>
> On 3/9/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Shame on you! :-D
> >
> >
I couldn’t reproduce it in a
distilled project. The problem turned up in a model. Sorry for wasting your
time, Igor, and thanks for a really nice framework!
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Igor Vaynberg
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006
2:23 PM
To:
And I forgot JavaLobby, but you took care of that for me. Thanks! @B-)Now, to create a real web app using wicket...On 3/9/06,
Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Shame on you! :-DCrossposting on the userlist, your blog and TSS...Great article, and great response though!MartijnPS. don't for
Thanks for writing it!
Eelco
On 3/9/06, Guillermo Castro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Feast your eyes (and share your comments) on the article I wrote about
> Wicket:
>
> http://javageek.org/2006/03/08/comparing_web_frameworks_wicket.html
>
> There's also a lively discussion about
Shame on you! :-D
Crossposting on the userlist, your blog and TSS...
Great article, and great response though!
Martijn
PS. don't forget to nominate Wicket in the Sourceforge.net choice awards!
On 3/9/06, Guillermo Castro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Feast your eyes (and share yo
Hey guys,Feast your eyes (and share your comments) on the article I wrote about Wicket:http://javageek.org/2006/03/08/comparing_web_frameworks_wicket.html
There's also a lively discussion about it on TheServerSide:http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=39358
Sorry for the shameless
There's already people trying wicket on Glassfish:http://shitmores.blogspot.com/2005/12/glassfish-and-wicket.html(the article has very little details, though)
Regards.On 3/9/06, Shreedhar Ganapathy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Johan. I'll look for your blog on this. Do drop me a li
wicket examples/ajax has a choice example that does the same thing and has a submit button. i couldnt reproduce the problem.can you reproduce it in a quickstart project so that i can take a look at it?-Igor
On 3/9/06, Jerry Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The section that gets upda
The section that gets updated when the
ListMultipleChoice onchange happens is wrapped in a WebMarkupContainer. Before
the form is submitted it works great. It starts acting weird after the form is
submitted. There are no calls to setRedirect on this page anywhere, I guess I’m
using the d
also you cannot update a component attached to a select element directly. this is because browsers dont allow select.innertHTML to work. so you will need to wrap your component with a webmarkup container and update that via ajax instead.
there is an example of this in wicket-examples/builtin-ajax-I
thats weird, why is an ajax request causing a redirect? are you setting the redirect manually somewhere? what render strategy do you use?-IgorOn 3/9/06,
Jerry Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a ListMultipleChoice with an AJAX onchange handler attached to itin a form. When I first bring up
Guys,
We get a good number of new users here and on the ##wicket IRC channel
asking about the number of large sites running wicket. I would like to
add something to the faq that would give people who are looking at
wicket some information in this regard.
If you have a site that either does are w
I have a ListMultipleChoice with an AJAX onchange handler attached to it
in a form. When I first bring up the form, the behavior works fine. I
submit the form, which comes back to the same page. Now when I select
something in the ListMultipleChoice it's throwing:
Caused by: java.lang.ClassCastE
Thanks Johan. I'll look for your blog on this. Do drop me a line when
you get to it.
Although GlassFish is officially still in single instance mode with
formal clustering support slated for later, one can always have two
or more instances with identical configurations fronted by Apache and
the only reason it didnt work for Ari was because he already created his application and only now is thinking about trimming.we say we trim all textfields by default, if you want to break out of it either override wherever needed or use a subclass.
i dont see why we need some global option for some
That works for single cases, just as it would have worked for single
cases for Ari. But whether you want to have trimming applied or not is
also a cross cutting concern.
Eelco
On 3/9/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> then create a subclass and use that instead :)
>
> -Igor
>
>
>
> On
when do you want that?I think 99% of all the text fields don't want trailing or leading spaces.So you can make it an options but then suddenly you have to do it the other way aroundif you do want trimming.
But we can make it an option, i don't mind, i just think it is not really needed as an option
then create a subclass and use that instead :)-IgorOn 3/9/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:Of course. If you don't want all your textfields to trim your input by
default, but instead have the input applied to your models exactly asit was provided, it is nice to be able to turn it off
Of course. If you don't want all your textfields to trim your input by
default, but instead have the input applied to your models exactly as
it was provided, it is nice to be able to turn it off application
wide.
Eelco
> Because does it make sense to globally set it off?
> why would you do that?
at least lets get the full story here![10:24] jcompagner: reported-> fixed in one minute![10:24] ivaynberg: i think i broke that one when i was doing all that refactoring[10:24] ivaynberg: but its your fault because you didnt write a test for it :)
[10:24] * ivaynberg ducksas you can see this was a
that bug was only a 1.2 bug.Igor did introduce that bug "[19:24 (09-03 )] ivaynberg: i think i broke that one when i was doing all that refactoring"johanOn 3/9/06,
Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also in wicket 1.1.1?MartijnOn 3/9/06,
Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
that is
Also in wicket 1.1.1?MartijnOn 3/9/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
that is a bug. Fixed it.
johanOn 3/9/06, Joe Toth <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was having similiar trouble - using 1.2beta.In FormInput example by default something is always selected for theRadioChoice because of th
http://www.wilsonresearch.com/2006/ostgawards06/ostgawards4.phpto be exact.MartijnOn 3/9/06,
Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Don't forget to vote for your favorite sourceforge projects :)http://sourceforge.net/awards/cca/(wicket is under development in case you would consider that).
Eel
what about trimming leading spaces as well (by default)?
On 3/9/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But it has to be something that can be turned off (and on), not only
> at a component level, but also with an application property.
>
> Eelco
>
> On 3/9/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTEC
But it has to be something that can be turned off (and on), not only
at a component level, but also with an application property.
Eelco
On 3/9/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> that is what i want also. i think a better default is to always trim.
>
> -Igor
>
>
>
> On 3/9/06, Johan Co
Don't forget to vote for your favorite sourceforge projects :)
http://sourceforge.net/awards/cca/
(wicket is under development in case you would consider that).
Eelco
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting lang
that is a bug. Fixed it.johanOn 3/9/06, Joe Toth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was having similiar trouble - using 1.2beta.In FormInput example by default something is always selected for theRadioChoice because of this in the FormInputModelline 91...private String numberRadioChoice = (String)FormInp
I was having similiar trouble - using 1.2beta.
In FormInput example by default something is always selected for the
RadioChoice because of this in the FormInputModel
line 91...
private String numberRadioChoice = (String)FormInput.NUMBERS.get(0);
If you change it to private String numberRadioChoi
Nah, we don't need a delegate. Making it non-final would work well
enough wouldn't it.
Furthermore, I now agree with Igor and Jonathan (and Johan?) that
trimming is something we should build in text components by default.
Eelco
On 3/9/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We could ma
It doesn't...
RequiredValidator does seem to work fine
with RadioChoice with or w/o a ChoiceRenderer.
However, use of RequiredValidator blows up with an NPE when
added to a DropDownChoice component. Again, I'm in Wicket 1.1.1
release.
From: Johan Compagner
[mailto:[EMAIL PROT
what does a choicerenderer have to do with a required validator?johanOn 3/9/06, Bennett, Timothy (JIS - Applications) <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wonder if mine are blowing up because I've added
ChoiceRenderers...
From: Johan Compagner
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, M
I wonder if mine are blowing up because I've added
ChoiceRenderers...
From: Johan Compagner
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 9:06
AMTo: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.netSubject: Re:
[Wicket-user] Validation of SingleSelectChoice components
If you add
If you add a required validator to the radiochoice doesn't that work if you don't select anything?A dropdown is can be tricky because there is most of the time a selection.So if the value of that is "" then required should also work fine. And by default our nothing selected
values are "" so then th
I'm using Wicket
1.1.1 and I'm stumped on how to apply RequiredValidator (or equivalent
validation) to components like DropDownChoice and
RadioChoice?
Regards,
Timothy
It's a 1.2 feature but it's not particularly well-documented at the moment.
There's some code in wicket-examples/niceurl in CVS and there's been a
little mention on the mailing list (search for "mount" or
"mountBookmarkablePage") but I've not had a chance to try using it
myself, so that's about th
I haven't tried glassfish with wicket yet, but i will have a look at it.I did look through some docs of glassfish how easy it was to setup a clusterwith 2 app servers and a balancer. But couldn't find step by step documentation
So i used for that resin which is very simple to setup with a resin bal
This is a great idea ! Thanks !
Ari S.
- Original Message -
From: "Johan Compagner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] TextField and trimming blanks at end (and maybe at
beginning)
We could make it non final or make a deleg
yes i fixed it.But still the spec doesn't say that i can't ask for the id of the session that was invalidatedWhy give the session object with the event if you can't ask or do anything with it.thats just strange.
johanOn 3/9/06, Ingram Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This happened after session expi
This happened after session expired or explicitly invalidated.excerpt from Servlet spec 2.3:"When an application stores an object in or removes an object from a session, thesession checks whether the object implements HttpSessionBindingListener .
If it does, the servlet notifies the object that it
Why oh why can't you ask for the id of a session in valueUnbound, thats just stupid.will try to fix it to hold the id of the session.johanOn 3/9/06,
Ingram Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All, I upgrade to 1.2beta1 but found session produce invalidataion error occasionally :2006/3/9 下午 04:42:13
All, I upgrade to 1.2beta1 but found session produce invalidataion error occasionally :2006/3/9 下午 04:42:13 org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase backgroundProcessWarn: Exception processing manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
background processjava.lang.IllegalStateException: getId: Session already inval
Could you make Converter not final, so I could subclass it and override convert
?
Ari S.
- Original Message -
From: "Eelco Hillenius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] TextField and trimming blanks at end (and maybe at
begi
This was also one idea that I considered. However, as it is more than just a
one or two lines of code I decided to start this discussion in order to find
a more elegant way.
If you think about real-world applications, I would say that on-one
wants to sit anwering support calls about odd incidents
Another thing you can do is copy 'n paste Converter, make your
adjustement, and use that as the application wide converter. I think
everyone is happy then, and I don't think it is a class that'll change
often if ever.
Eelco
On 3/9/06, Ari Suutari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whats the risk here
Whats the risk here ? The default StringConverter in wicket does nothing
when invoked for String-String conversion.
Ari S.
- Original Message -
From: "Igor Vaynberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 10:42 AM
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] TextField and trimming bl
AOP would be one solution, but haven't needed it so far with wicket, because
there have always been elegant interfaces that I have been able to use to
make things work like we want. That wouldn't be wicket's way of doing things,
would it ?
Ari S.
- Original Message -
From: "Eelco Hil
I don't feel as strongly, so need to to vote here. It's been in there
a long time and it isn't really wrong either. So what other options
does Ari have - besides AOP.
On 3/9/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> this is not a kind of a problem i would want to be tracing for, especially
>
this is not a kind of a problem i would want to be tracing for, especially as a user. you add your own string converter and that suddenly breaks some internal feature that you dont even know about, or maybe it even breaks some 3rd party components.
i know i feel strongly about this one. how strong
Hi,
Yes. After all, the name is "Converter", not "TypeConverter".
Ari S.
- Original Message -
From: "Eelco Hillenius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] TextField and trimming blanks at end (and maybe at
beginning)
It's p
Ari, what about using AOP?
Eelco
On 3/9/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's potentially dangerous, second that. But the argument of whether
> it is a good use of converters or not aside, when I put on my user hat
> and look at that API, *I* would expect conversion to happen from
It's potentially dangerous, second that. But the argument of whether
it is a good use of converters or not aside, when I put on my user hat
and look at that API, *I* would expect conversion to happen from input
parameters to my model properties regardless whether it has the target
type or not.
Eel
this might have nasty side effects that we do not see right now. for example converters are going to start running on things they werent running on before. how is this going to affect existing applications?furthermore afaict the intention behind converters was to have a generic /type/ conversion fr
64 matches
Mail list logo
