we usually hang out in ##wicket not #wicket. and there is about 5-6 of us there generally.-IgorOn 12/11/05, Mark Derricutt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Out of curiosity - how many of you guys hang out on #wicket on
irc.freenode.org? I've popped in every now and then to find the channel empty...Mark
And hopefully more when we tell more people!
Eelco
On 12/11/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we usually hang out in ##wicket not #wicket. and there is about 5-6 of us
there generally.
-Igor
On 12/11/05, Mark Derricutt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Out of curiosity - how many of
You are right. It's a bug. We should check on that first slash. Can't
fix it now though, so if anyone wants to do it...
Eelc
On 12/11/05, Mark Derricutt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had the following code in my app (using HEAD):
mountBookmarkablePage(user/signup, Signup.class)
I just
fixed.-IgorOn 12/11/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are right. It's a bug. We should check on that first slash. Can'tfix it now though, so if anyone wants to do it...EelcOn 12/11/05, Mark Derricutt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: I had the following code in my app (using HEAD):
Mark Derricutt wrote:
From the look of it, my guess it's because of the encoding of the
.java files.
The code reads:
convertNonASCIIString(Çüéâäàåçêë),
instead of using raw unicode references such as \uxx
When I check the file information on the source I've checked out of
CVS I see:
Andrew!
Man, Thanks, this works perfectly for me, I did think of this solution,
but I didn't have the well to try it till you suggested it :)
Johan, Man I can't wait for 1.2, from what I read it has allot of what I need :)
Thanks guys, if you are interested, I'm writting now 2 application
using
I posted this to the ServerSide in the recent article on wingS. How
would you sell wicket, which requires a physical HTML page, over
wingS, which I think does not?
---
While I've looked at wicket 1.1 very closely, I've only read the
documentation for wingS 2.0. Both intrigue me, and I'm trying
Though I've not looked at WingS at all ... I am really enjoying
working with wicket because it feels less like mucking around with
tags (whether xml or xhtml), and more like actual bare-knuckles
programming.
That being said, I don't really get a warm fuzzy about having *all*
of my page
clarification below
On Dec 11, 2005, at 9:11 PM, Andrew Lombardi wrote:
Though I've not looked at WingS at all ... I am really enjoying
working with wicket because it feels less like mucking around with
tags (whether xml or xhtml), and more like actual bare-knuckles
programming.
That
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
we usually hang out in ##wicket not #wicket. and there is about 5-6 of
us there generally.
-Igor
Just as a Me too, I am one of the ones that is usually on ##wicket. I
find the discussion to be helpful there, despite the fact that the user
count is currently fairly
10 matches
Mail list logo
