Yea, that's why I figured it was a bug.
wicket.markup.MarkupException: Unable to find component with id
'title' in [MarkupContainer [Component id = _extend, page =
md.lhm.wicket.page.cart.ViewCart, path =
Here we go. Right now you'll get a RuntimeException. Change the ps to
divs and it's all good.
-Phil
On 11/15/05, Phil Kulak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yea, that's why I figured it was a bug.
wicket.markup.MarkupException: Unable to find component with id
'title' in [MarkupContainer [Component
Are you adding the text field?
On 11/10/05, Marco van de Haar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Typo, sorry, ofcourse I meant FormComponentFeedbackIndicator
We're trying to test a TextField wit a FormFeedbackIndicator. but
we keep getting a 'the following Components failed to render' error on
Meta refresh works and is a nice backup, but with AJAX you don't have
to have the user looking at a flickering screen and you can put images
and fancy things on the page. Here's how I do it.
RedirectHandler.java
Description: Binary data
It's best to keep your app context beans in the Wicket application.
See the wicket-phonebook example in wicket-stuff cvs.
On 11/14/05, Maik Dobryn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Igor,
I'm very new to Wicket. The last days I tried to figure out how the
Spring integration in Wicket works.
There
App servers HAVE to put that in the first URL, because it's really the
second (because of the redirect). The server doesn't know if the
client is using cookies until the first request comes back, so for the
first request it has to use cookies and url rewriting.
So you just need to know when the item you're rendering is the last in
the list? Well, you have access to the list (getList()) and the item
(item.getModelObject()), so it should be pretty straight forward, if
not elegant, to find out if the item is the last in the list.
On 11/1/05, Eelco
that differ from the underlying model.
Eelco
On 11/2/05, Phil Kulak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So you just need to know when the item you're rendering is the last in
the list? Well, you have access to the list (getList()) and the item
(item.getModelObject()), so it should be pretty straight
Let's say I have this code on a page:
add(new Label(label1, new Model() {
public Object getObject(Component c) {
// Return some interesting string...
}
});
add(new Label(label2, new Model() {
public Object getObject(Component c) {
// Return some other interesting string...
if you call setModelObject and your component is
versioned, the model - since its anonymous - will serialize the page and
take up a lot of space. better use an inner static class.
-Igor
On 11/2/05, Phil Kulak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's say I have this code on a page:
add(new Label
The beauty of the @Override notation. :D
On 10/29/05, Dan Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Andrew (and everyone) -- my dumb mistake.
[I'm in the cleanup phase of the beta for my new app; I'll send a link to
wicket-user pretty soon to try out.]
If that's really what's happening, then it's a bug.
On 10/28/05, Dan Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to create a form with multiple submit buttons follow the
example on
http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Multiple_submit_buttons_in_form
The buttons' onSubmit isn't getting
I like the idea of being able to plug in OGNL if you really need it.
Now that I think about it, I've got a couple ChoiceRenderers that call
functions using OGNL. Although, it probably would be very easy to
rewrite these by just implementing the interface myself, and much more
efficient.
to a full url (but then with https)
On 10/26/05, Phil Kulak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At first I tried sending a redirect to the URL in the request, but
with https instead of http, but that breaks down if the user is
redirected to the secure page since the url may include listener
I'm trying to get something to work with:
page.urlFor(IRedirectListener.class);
but it just doesn't and I can't seem to figure out why not.
On 10/27/05, Phil Kulak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yea, but my problem is finding that full url because when
checkAccess() is called, the url
Kulak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to get something to work with:
page.urlFor(IRedirectListener.class);
but it just doesn't and I can't seem to figure out why not.
On 10/27/05, Phil Kulak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yea, but my problem is finding that full url because when
checkAccess
At first I tried sending a redirect to the URL in the request, but
with https instead of http, but that breaks down if the user is
redirected to the secure page since the url may include listener
interfaces and what have you. I could still do this if there was some
other way to get the url for a
Just put this in an random markup file:
span
and you'll get the stack trace. ;)
On 10/25/05, Nick Heudecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I checked my old logs and wasn't able to find the stack trace. Apologies.
On 10/25/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes I agree, but please
That's what's nice about the tag being visible by default.
On 10/17/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep, totally. Anyting you like. If a component should /not/ be
attached to a certain tag, it should tell you so by throwing an
exception. Some of the formcomponents do this.
Eelco
I agree, for what it's worth.
On 10/17/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like a good one for core.
Eelco
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and
application level defaults for Validator messages. First we
try to find it by path and in case it does not exist, it tries to find
it by class name only. Please the conversation I had with Igor
recently.
Juergen
On 10/14/05, Phil Kulak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And by we, I mean you. :D
On 10/14
It looks like resources are now being looked up only be class name, not path.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
And by we, I mean you. :D
On 10/14/05, Phil Kulak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like resources are now being looked up only be class name, not path.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content
But DataView has NO dependencies. If you're worried about too many
classes in the core, just add a DataView(String id, List list)
constructor (using the ListAdapter) to DataView and get rid of
ListView.
On 10/11/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't agree with that. You want the
Oh, well, I agree that the hibernate stuff should not be in the core.
On 10/13/05, Nathan Hamblen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing I mean by integration is a built-in loadable detachable model
for Hibernate mapped objects, like what's in contrib.data and
contrib.database. After that, you
Do you have a resource reference named images/delete.gif? Because if
you're just trying to make a static link to a static image, there's no
need to get Wicket involved:
img src=images/delete.gif type=image width=12 height=12
alt=[Delete] border=0 valign=middle /
On 10/10/05, Francis Amanfo
/10/05, Phil Kulak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have a resource reference named images/delete.gif? Because if
you're just trying to make a static link to a static image, there's no
need to get Wicket involved:
img src=images/delete.gif type=image width=12 height=12
alt=[Delete
I just found this and would like to do the same, however, it looks
like Page now has three static methods. Is there now a better way to
do this, or can I just return null from those three methods?
On 9/24/05, pepone pepone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i open a bug with this at
support
any extension. It would not be possible anymore to have a dynamically
designated markup type, though I don't think that will ever be a
problem. Was that what you meant Phil? And others... what about this
idea?
Eelco
On 10/10/05, Phil Kulak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just found
There are two ways to get around this problem. Both work okay, but
they both have a certain stink to them. The first is to make
everything a model. That way, the data is only referenced on render
and there are no null pointers at that point. The other is to have an
init method that builds the
I've got a page that is versioned, but the models never change, so
neither does the URL. This means that the browser never refreshes the
page and changes are not shown to the user. Is there anyway I can get
that URL to change short of adding a fake model somewhere and changing
it?
Is this possible? I would like to persist my WebSession
implementation, but to get the right one back out of the database when
the user returns, I need access to a cookie in the request. Thanks!
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power
Eh, nevermind. The more I think about this, the more I think it's just
better to delegate to a new persistant session from my Wicket session.
On 10/3/05, Phil Kulak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this possible? I would like to persist my WebSession
implementation, but to get the right one back out
That will work. Thanks!
On 10/3/05, Michael Jouravlev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You don't like no-cache, no-store cache-control header?
On 10/3/05, Phil Kulak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got a page that is versioned, but the models never change, so
neither does the URL. This means
, Phil Kulak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used to just get the HttpServletResponse and HttpServletRequest, but
it looks like that's no longer possible since the response won't
necessarily be a WebResponse. Is there a better way to do
No, you can't actually. Sometimes it's a StringResponse.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
and of course any user can
use its own response object. only at the end of the cycle you can be
sure: onEndRequests.
Juergen
On 10/4/05, Phil Kulak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, you can't actually. Sometimes it's a StringResponse
Well, Wicket defines the correct place as the same package as the component.
On 10/3/05, Ari Suutari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Assume following html:
span wicket:id=border
img wicket:id=img src=test.png/
/span
Now, If the application is in package syncrontech.test except that
Yes, they only load the data for the current page. Of course, you
still have to be careful with some databases. SQL Server (and actually
ANSI SQL), for example, does not have any way to return results from
the middle of a SELECT, so Hibernate will do a SELECT TOP, then only
show you the results
Are you using a model now and doing the lookup there? If you just
downloaded the new code and didn't change you code to use the new API,
nothing will change. I made it all backwards compatible.
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your
a pretty easy trap to fall into; if a view object sneaks into
a model somehow, your session is headed for disaster. Wouldn't that mean
you can never have an anonymous subclass of Model in any kind of
Component? I feel like I've seen that all over the place.
Nathan
Phil Kulak wrote
Sorry about that. I totally spaced this thread because it was called
list view. Anyway, I added constructors to HibernateDataProvider and
HibernateModel that take IModels for the IHibernateDao for the case
when you want to do a lookup. For example:
IModel lookup = new Model() {
public Object
So now we don't have to even set multipart to true in the class?
Hmm... that's pretty elegant. Especially since a short time ago it was
an entirely different subclass.
On 9/20/05, Scott Sauyet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Found it. Fix it by calling 'setMultipart(true)' in
. If there was a way to have it be
myFile.pdf, then there would be no confusion. Does that make sense?
On 9/15/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i would say use a ResourceLink for that.
Then the resource is only useable for that session.
On 9/15/05, Phil Kulak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Currently if a button is found, it's onSubmit is called instead of the
form's. Why would you want to take the button's logic out of the
button?
On 9/14/05, Dipu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using the wicket version 1.1-b4,
when setDefaultFormProcessing() is set to false, the form is not
And we see how easilly it can all be taken away again. :D
On 9/14/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i think we should jonathan look at the FileResourceStream now.
I think he can think of some methods to make final now ;)
lik getContentType() ;)
On 9/14/05, Eelco Hillenius
No, don't use a ListView, use a DataView. You can do what you want
with the GridPanel, however, by implementing your own IColumn. That's
a bit of a pain though.
On 9/14/05, Troy MacNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there an easy way to add Links to a GridPanel? I'd like to change the
edit button
This is one of the main reason that Igor made DataView.
On 9/14/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Updating by index works fine as long as the List behind it never changes.
So if you know 100% sure that over request the list will not change
(add/remove/order)
then you can use
, Phil Kulak wrote:
No, don't use a ListView, use a DataView. You can do what you want
with the GridPanel, however, by implementing your own IColumn. That's
a bit of a pain though.
On 9/14/05, Troy MacNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there an easy way to add Links to a GridPanel? I'd like
I need to allow users to download files, but they (the files) are
secure and must only be viewed by the user I give the link to. I've
been using resources, but that has the consequence of the files coming
out with the name app and no extension. Does anyone know of a way I
can get the utility of a
Check out FileResourceStream. Create one of those from your file, then
you can create a ResourceLink directly to it. Or, if you don't want to
create the resource for every user, you can wrap it in a resource
reference and link to that instead.
On 9/13/05, Scott Sauyet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
haha, I should have just asked. I've been using my own non-final
FileResourceStream for months now. :D
On 9/13/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I made it non-final.
Eelco
On 9/13/05, Scott Sauyet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a good reason to have FileResourceStream
I would use a ListView that took a list of these guys:
interface LinkOnClick {
public void onClick();
}
Then just call the onClick from inside each Link's onClick.
On 9/12/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why must there be dynamic wicket ids?
why do you need those? How would
Oh, better make the interface this:
interface LinkOnClick {
public void onClick();
public String linkText(); // Text for the label in the link.
}
On 9/12/05, Phil Kulak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would use a ListView that took a list of these guys:
interface LinkOnClick {
public void
add(new TextField(tf)
.add(new AttributeModifier(disable, true, new Model(disable;
Is that what you're looking for? I don't have to API by me, but that
should be close.
On 9/12/05, Ingram Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way to disable form component in java code ?
input
I would just create an inner class for the model object:
private static class FormObject {
public MyObject myDomainObject = new MyObject();;
public String nextUrl;
}
and then something like:
add(new MyForm(form, new CompoundPropertyModel(new FormObject(;
On 9/7/05, Nick Heudecker
Hey there, Ryan. It looks like your stuff broke during the Ajax
refactor. I thought I took care of it by getting rid of the NPEs, but
now formComponent.getValue() on line 98 of AjaxAutocompleteTextField
always returns the empty string. I'm not even sure how that whole
block of code is working, so
I like to stay as state oriented as possible. Mainly because that way
I can take advantage of bookmarkable pages much more. Also for the
reasons Eelco stated.
On 9/5/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I prefer to work with pages. With this approach, you can still reuse
panels
Very impressive! Thanks for contributing this. I see myself using it a
lot in the future.
Is there anyway to make CustomLayoutAjaxAutocompleteTextField take a
panel instead of an entire page? Maybe make the class name a bit
longer too. ;)
On 9/4/05, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey
by the way,
you should do that with DynamicByteArrayResource
and then do you thing on getData()
johan
Phil Kulak wrote:
I'm trying to lazy-load some data from my database in
ResourceReference.newResource(), but I can't get to any of my DAOs
because for some reason RequestCycle.get
:
public class MyResourceReference extends ResourceReference {
public Resource newResource() {
return new DynamicByteArrayResource()
{
getData()
{ // do a bunch of database lookups and things...
}
}
}
}
Phil Kulak wrote:
I need
FCK tends to spit out nicer HTML and it's configuration is easier, at
least when I tried both of them a while back.
-Phil
On 9/1/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That would be a very nice component to have in extensions. So if you
make it really nice... I think an API like
Was this method moved or removed?
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects Teams *
No no, I like it better this way. For some reason I just posted here
instead of doing a text search. :D
On 8/30/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can revert it if you want?
;)
Phil Kulak wrote:
Coolness, thanks.
On 8/30/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes
DataView handles all of that transparently, so it may be worth looking into.
On 8/30/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We found what it is. Quite logical actually.
By default, optimizeItemRemoval is set to false, which means that
ListView replaces all child components by new
Oh, looks like you have to explicitly set userOptimizeItemRemoval now.
However, when you do that, it is all handled for you. Take a look at
populateItemsOIR().
On 8/30/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how so?
private void populateItems()
{
final IDataProvider
public void onSubmit() {
MapString, FileItem files = ((MultipartWebRequest)
getRequest()).getFiles();
// do something with the files...
}
Badda bing. :)
On 8/29/05, Scott Sauyet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I'm still missing some of the basics here, so this may be a dumb
question.
Jetty + JWebUnit is a really nice solution for me at least.
On 8/28/05, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a previous project we used the Jetty embedded servlet container,
together with a TestSetUp decorator (the same we use in the Wicket
examples), and that kept the tests running
I like FCK, but support for any one of them would be very trivial. All
you would have to do is add a couple lines of JS to the header and
maybe add an attribute to the tag.
On 8/28/05, Kenneth Foo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've used TinyMCE with with some good results.
No, it's DateFormat.setLenient(boolean lenient).
On 8/26/05, Nick Heudecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the leniency is in Calendar, not DateFormat.
On 8/25/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's probably the lenient feature of DateFormat. Thought that was
off by
Pooling has some huge drawbacks since it really goes against the
language itself. I think it's good for things like DB connections that
really are expensive, but for pages? They're just objects.
On 8/26/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ahh
ok now i get also eelco's response
Gili, don't think that just because you are not directly insulting
someone that they have no right to be angry with you and possibly say
something to you that you find insulting. In your mind open source
developers have an obligation to see that you are properly educated
about all aspects of their
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Phil Kulak
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 6:37 PM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] expand emty tags
Jonathan told me it was because nothing would be previewed in
a WYSIWYG editor, so Wicket displayed
Hmm... it would make sense if there were a distinction between the
empty string and null in XML. You're probably right.
On 8/26/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hmm? the body is isn't it?
On 8/26/05, Phil Kulak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yea, but span/span also has no body
haha, I stand corrected. :)
On 8/26/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, it's both. It's on DateFormat, as that is what we use in
Wicket. However DateFormat uses an instance of Calendar:
public void setLenient(boolean lenient)
{
This has been discussed before. Long story short, it's a feature not a bug. ;)
On 8/25/05, pepone pepone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello when i write a component and put a markup tag like this
span wicket:id=lblName/ the value of the tag is not render
it only run it is writed in this way
. :)
On 8/25/05, Phil Kulak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This has been discussed before. Long story short, it's a feature not a
bug. ;)
On 8/25/05, pepone pepone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello when i write a component and put a markup tag like this
span wicket:id=lblName
I updated your source for the latest Wicket build and moved the
stylesheet into the header. Do you mind if I commit that?
On 8/22/05, Phil Kulak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would love it if you committed this somewhere or posted a formal jar
that I could play with. It would be nice if Wicket had
Check out FormComponentFeedbackBorder, or you can do what I do and
just make your own markup container like so (untested):
public class ErrorIndicator extends WebMarkupContainer {
FormComponent component;
public ErrorIndicator(String id, FormComponent component) {
super(id);
What I've done is have all my HTML files in one folder (there was a
topic on that recently) and then just copy stylesheets and images over
to that folder for previewing. It's not very elegant, but the
alternative is to have every single image and stylesheet handled by
Wicket, which is a bit of a
Is that label in a form?
On 8/23/05, Eric Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First of all, I apologize for the beginner question. I am fairly new to
Java and Wicket.
I have download the Wicket Kickstart 1.0.1 today and I am having some
trouble.
The default Kickstart app worked fine,
that, we've no solution for a
pre-1.5 user and I've not concept of what's involved to make a
unannotated equivalent of an Annotated solution, if you see what I
mean...
/Gwyn
On 22/08/05, Phil Kulak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the best place for a user to start is with the dataview
I would love it if you committed this somewhere or posted a formal jar
that I could play with. It would be nice if Wicket had a good auto
complete field and yours is a better start then what I came up with
last week, I believe.
On 8/22/05, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ryan,
I
I think the best place for a user to start is with the dataview and
hibernate3 projects. I'm refactoring the hibernate3 examples as we
speek to use that combination.
On 8/21/05, Gwyn Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is on the Wiki as Talk:Wicket-Stuff
I'd like to participate in that. I've done a couple projects now with
Spring + Wicket.
On 8/19/05, Alexandru Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#: Eelco Hillenius changed the world a bit at a time by saying on 8/19/2005
3:06 PM :#
Don't know yet :) Lets see if there are more people that want
What I would do is use a PageableDataView (wicket-contrib-dataview)
and a HibernateDataProvider or HIbernateCriteriaProvider from the
wicket-contrib-hibernate3 project.
On 8/18/05, Gwyn Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone suggest where would be a good place to start in order to be
able to
I think AJAX is the solution here.
On 8/18/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes this is a problem that i am also looking at.
We should do a form post instead of making getting a url..
But this is not so easy at the moment.
Validators of the form shouldn't run,
And i don't think
Don't set the redirect page if you're calling redirectToInterceptPage().
On 8/18/05, David Liebeherr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all!
I have a problem with the redirectToInterceptPage.
I have this:
listItem.add(new Link(delete) {
public void onClick() {
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Phil Kulak
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 7:15 PM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Using DropDownChoice and
wantOnSelectionChangedNotifications=true clean other form components
I think AJAX is the solution here
MyForm.this.getModelObject();
Still three steps though. Couldn't beat Igor's. :) And that will only
work if they are nested and non static, of course.
On 8/16/05, Joshua Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like Igor's method a little better ;)
but thanks for the suggestion
On 8/17/05, Gili
I don't like the idea of components creating their own markup instead
of taking it from the markup stream. In fact, I'd really like to see
components like RadioChoice and DropDownChoice operate more like Loop
or ListView then how they do now. I think that having a renderer would
be a step back. I
Check out the user's guide as well. There's some very good
documentation on models in there.
On 8/17/05, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This just works, but not totally as you might expect...
public MyForm(String id, FooBar foobar) {
super(id, new
My bad. I was a little behind the curve on Igor's changes. It's fixed now.
On 8/15/05, Gili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can clearly see it here:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/wicket-stuff/wicket-contrib-dataview/src/wicket/contrib/dataview/IUniqueIdProvider.java?rev=1.1view=log
Knock yourself out.
On 8/16/05, Gili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no way to offset the ColumnedDataProvider beginning index.
This functionality doesn't really belong here but until the refactor of
contrib-data I don't think there is a cleaner way.
So I'll be adding
);
add(gridPanel);
Phil Kulak wrote:
Hmm.. there's another reason why I don't like coarse-grained
components like that. Since the component is doing all the saving and
updating, there's not a whole lot you can do.
On 8/15/05, Oleg Marchuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
Today I
If you used a PropertyModel or CompoundPropertyModel, then that's all
you have to do. When the form is submitted, the properties will be
updated if the form passes validation.
On 8/16/05, Anders Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Beginner here!
Stuck on a problem:
1) I get all (4) records
So as far as the patch goes, I
like the idea but maybe we should just do
model.getModelObject().equals(model2.getModelObject()) as opposed to
model.equals(model2).
You can get yourself into some nasty N + 1 select problems like that
if you're not careful. I think it's a bad idea to do an
you render.
-Igor
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Phil Kulak
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2005 11:52 PM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] [Wicket] DataView and optimized
item removal
So
Hmm.. there's another reason why I don't like coarse-grained
components like that. Since the component is doing all the saving and
updating, there's not a whole lot you can do.
On 8/15/05, Oleg Marchuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
Today I get cdapp example and play with it. I set one of
I would really appreciate it if someone could let me know if this is
possible. If it's not currently possible, I'd be happy to submit a
patch for whatever solution I come up with. I'd like to not resort to
a servlet if I can help it.
On 8/15/05, Phil Kulak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I've got
1 - 100 of 229 matches
Mail list logo
