https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53076
--- Comment #20 from Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org ---
Use case for 3rd party MediWiki sysadmins:
Mobile used to be read-only, now we just upgraded to 1.22 and we got mobile
editing. It's quite new, kind of testing. Let's see how it goes.
If
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53076
--- Comment #17 from Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to comment #15)
You or any other wiki system
administrator determine who can edit by modifying user rights in
LocalSettings.php. You can restrict anonymous (mobile) editing
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53076
--- Comment #18 from MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com ---
(In reply to comment #17)
You've been asked repeatedly to provide a use-case and have failed to do so.
MZMcBride, you say that you don't see a compelling case. The maintainers of
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53076
--- Comment #19 from Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org ---
The use-case is the following:
Number of useful edits from anonymous mobile editors number of non-useful
edits from anonymous mobile editors, but number of useful edits from
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53076
--- Comment #13 from MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com ---
(In reply to comment #12)
If this is the case, I think it shouldn't be removed unless there is already
another way for admins to limit mobile edits while allowing desktop edits.
Is there
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53076
--- Comment #14 from Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to comment #13)
(In reply to comment #12)
If this is the case, I think it shouldn't be removed unless there is already
another way for admins to limit mobile edits while
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53076
--- Comment #15 from MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com ---
(In reply to comment #14)
Isn't the question whether there is a use-case to remove an existing feature
that doesn't seem to bother anybody in MediaWiki-not-Wikimedia land?
Nope. Global
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53076
--- Comment #16 from MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com ---
To be clear, you _could_ re-implement this same functionality by creating
mobile-specific user rights (e.g., mobile-edit, mobile-upload, etc.). But I
don't see a compelling case for making
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53076
Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||q...@wikimedia.org
---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53076
--- Comment #9 from Bartosz Dziewoński matma@gmail.com ---
Well, in that case, we can use the very same repo to create some truly horrific
hooks which would achieve the same purpose. This kind of stuff was done before.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53076
--- Comment #10 from MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Well, in that case, we can use the very same repo to create some truly
horrific hooks which would achieve the same purpose. This kind of stuff was
done before.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53076
--- Comment #11 from Gerrit Notification Bot gerritad...@wikimedia.org ---
Change 106851 had a related patch set uploaded by Jdlrobson:
Remove wgMFAnonymousEditing
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/106851
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53076
Gerrit Notification Bot gerritad...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53076
MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||easy
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53076
Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53076
MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|enhancement |normal
--- Comment #4
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53076
Jon jrob...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #5
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53076
--- Comment #6 from MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Removing this will kill the CTA that has been successfully allowing us to run
getting started like experiments on new users and the huge increase in
accounts
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53076
--- Comment #7 from Bartosz Dziewoński matma@gmail.com ---
Don't we have, like, an entire repo dedicated to configuration settings
different in the code itself and in Wikimedia environment? We could totally use
that here I guess.
--
You
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53076
--- Comment #8 from MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Don't we have, like, an entire repo dedicated to configuration settings
different in the code itself and in Wikimedia environment? We could totally
use that here I
20 matches
Mail list logo
