https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
TeleComNasSprVen drevit...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
--- Comment #34 from Matthew Flaschen mflasc...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to comment #33)
FYI: we're testing the new namespace on Labs
(http://en.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org). Please help give it a try.
Thank you for testing.
Please hold
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
--- Comment #35 from Matthew Flaschen mflasc...@wikimedia.org ---
VisualEditor will be enabled in the namespace for opt-in users. See
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Draft_namespace and
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/102311/ .
--
You are
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
--- Comment #36 from Matthew Flaschen mflasc...@wikimedia.org ---
The VE stuff has now been included into the main change
(https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/97675/).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
--- Comment #37 from Gerrit Notification Bot gerritad...@wikimedia.org ---
Change 97675 merged by jenkins-bot:
Create Draft namespace on the English Wikipedia
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/97675
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
Matthew Flaschen mflasc...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|PATCH_TO_REVIEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
--- Comment #39 from MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com ---
Thank you Matt, Steven, and everyone else for your work on this. :-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
--- Comment #33 from Steven Walling swall...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to comment #29)
Change 99600 merged by jenkins-bot:
Test under-review English Wikipedia draft namespace on Labs
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/99600
FYI: we're
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
--- Comment #31 from MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com ---
(In reply to comment #30)
We don't use easy keyword for shell bugs, as they're advertised not as easy
bug to write but as easy bugs for new contributors to discover the code.
Shell bugs
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
--- Comment #32 from Bawolff (Brian Wolff) bawolff...@gmail.com ---
I used to have very strong opinions on easy with shell bugs, but that was back
in the svn days where you actually needed to be shell to do anything useful on
these bugs. Now
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
--- Comment #30 from Dereckson dereck...@espace-win.org ---
(In reply to comment #8)
(In reply to comment #6)
We're talking about a two-line configuration change here.
Probably a few more than two lines to create the namespace, the talk
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
--- Comment #28 from Gerrit Notification Bot gerritad...@wikimedia.org ---
Change 99600 had a related patch set uploaded by Mattflaschen:
Test under-review English Wikipedia draft namespace on Labs
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/99600
--
You
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
--- Comment #29 from Gerrit Notification Bot gerritad...@wikimedia.org ---
Change 99600 merged by jenkins-bot:
Test under-review English Wikipedia draft namespace on Labs
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/99600
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
--- Comment #24 from Matthew Flaschen mflasc...@wikimedia.org ---
Key minimum requirements for launch are being hashed out at
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Draft_namespace . Some are pretty definite
already (e.g. NOINDEX), while others are
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
Bawolff (Brian Wolff) bawolff...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
--- Comment #26 from Steven Walling swall...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to comment #25)
I have a hard time understanding what is going on here? If this was any other
wiki, we would note that their is community consensus, and implement the
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
--- Comment #27 from Equazcion equazc...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #25)
I have a hard time understanding what is going on here? If this was any
other
wiki, we would note that their is community consensus, and implement the
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
Technical 13 technical...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
--- Comment #15 from Technical 13 technical...@yahoo.com ---
(In reply to comment #4)
As I stated at the other bug, these are not questions that need to block
creation of the namespace. It rather seems apparent that you saw this
proposal
as
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
--- Comment #16 from Equazcion equazc...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #14)
I fully share this view. I've been toying with the idea of an extension here
for some time. There is this new namespace, there is the new userright that
the
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
TheOriginalSoni the.original.s...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
--- Comment #18 from Nemo federicol...@tiscali.it ---
(In reply to comment #17)
I am fine with whichever proposal
gets
this done, as long as it does through whatever procedure it is normally
expected to.
Don't worry: the procedure is
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
Ori Livneh o...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||o...@wikimedia.org
---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
--- Comment #20 from Matthew Flaschen mflasc...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to comment #16)
I might even support it, once it's clear what the proposed changes are (all
I've seen spelled out so far are a new landing page and some sort of
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
--- Comment #21 from MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com ---
(In reply to comment #19)
I agree with most of what you wrote, though a lot of it is relevant to bug
57315 rather than this bug.
Steven Walling is well-positioned to enlist some developer
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
--- Comment #22 from Steven Walling swall...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to comment #21)
(In reply to comment #19)
I agree with most of what you wrote, though a lot of it is relevant to bug
57315 rather than this bug.
Steven Walling is
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
--- Comment #23 from Nemo federicol...@tiscali.it ---
(In reply to comment #22)
Ori's point was partly that acting in a hasty manner and populating the
namespace with content right, so that it's less flexible to essential changes
in the near
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
Kunal Mehta (Legoktm) legoktm.wikipe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
Steven Walling swall...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
--- Comment #2 from MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Like I said on bug 57315, there are still too many unanswered questions about
this namespace to roll it out in a hasty way.
Does anyone else share your view?
--
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
--- Comment #3 from Steven Walling swall...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
Like I said on bug 57315, there are still too many unanswered questions
about
this namespace to roll it out in a hasty way.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
--- Comment #4 from Equazcion equazc...@gmail.com ---
As I stated at the other bug, these are not questions that need to block
creation of the namespace. It rather seems apparent that you saw this proposal
as something other than it was -- a
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
--- Comment #5 from Steven Walling swall...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to comment #4)
As I stated at the other bug, these are not questions that need to block
creation of the namespace.
Deciding the basics of who can do what in a new
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
--- Comment #6 from MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com ---
(In reply to comment #3)
This is not about consensus. We don't know basic things about how the
namespace would work.
I'm pretty sure we know how namespaces work. :-)
We still need to
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
--- Comment #7 from Steven Walling swall...@wikimedia.org ---
None of this is relevant to adding a new namespace and you know this.
If you want to improve the articles for creation process, great! I've filed
several bugs in this area. :-)
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||easy
--- Comment #8
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
Equazcion equazc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|easy|
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
--- Comment #10 from Kunal Mehta (Legoktm) legoktm.wikipe...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #2)
* who is allowed to create drafts. (e.g. Are anonymous users allowed to do
so?
I assume so but the proposal
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
Matthew Flaschen mflasc...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
Gerrit Notification Bot gerritad...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
--- Comment #12 from Gerrit Notification Bot gerritad...@wikimedia.org ---
Change 97675 had a related patch set uploaded by MZMcBride:
Create Draft namespace on the English Wikipedia
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/97675
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
Nemo federicol...@tiscali.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |Normal
42 matches
Mail list logo
