https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
Quiddity pandiculat...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
--- Comment #26 from Kunal Mehta (Legoktm) legoktm.wikipe...@gmail.com ---
Time to revisit this now that we're using jquery.confirmable for the
confirmation step?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
Steven Walling swall...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
Technical 13 technical...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
--- Comment #19 from Bartosz Dziewoński matma@gmail.com ---
Client-side queueing is unacceptable to me, both in the way Jared proposed
(which would mean the user has to wait on the page!) and in the way Technical
13 proposed (it would be
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
--- Comment #21 from Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org ---
There are two aspects here: the UI workflow and the notification sent.
At least Twitter and Facebook have a simple and binary workflow:
* Twitter: Favorite -- Favorited -- Favorite --
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
--- Comment #20 from Technical 13 technical...@yahoo.com ---
(In reply to comment #19)
Client-side queueing is unacceptable to me, both in the way Jared proposed
(which would mean the user has to wait on the page!) and in the way Technical
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
--- Comment #22 from Kunal Mehta (Legoktm) legoktm.wikipe...@gmail.com ---
I think MatmaRex's idea with https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/92315/ is a
better idea, and is unobtrusive IMO.
(In reply to comment #21)
About delayed notifications,
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
--- Comment #23 from Jared Zimmerman (WMF) jared.zimmer...@wikimedia.org ---
@kunal, I think we have 2 main goals:
1. Make positive actions (like thanks) on the site easy and seamless (in this
case seamless means fewer steps, preferably 1
2.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
--- Comment #24 from Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org ---
It seems to me that the problem of accidental thanks has far more to do with
the UI of the history and diff pages than the process of how thanks works
itself. In mobile, we've
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
--- Comment #25 from Jared Zimmerman (WMF) jared.zimmer...@wikimedia.org ---
Ryan,
I think thats a good point, but priority-wise we might have community members
that want to contribute to improving the thanking experience and we don't
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
Quiddity pandiculat...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
--- Comment #15 from Jared Zimmerman (WMF) jared.zimmer...@wikimedia.org ---
Can we have a GSoC student code it as the attached design shows. Roll it out
and get feedback on if we're still getting accidental clicks and track the
number of undos
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
--- Comment #16 from MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com ---
This is my personal take on this bug. I haven't followed everything
super-closely, but here's broadly what I see.
(In reply to comment #15)
Can we have a GSoC student code it as the
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
--- Comment #17 from Jared Zimmerman (WMF) jared.zimmer...@wikimedia.org ---
Perhaps we could make the queuing of the thank client side, and with a
shorter time span, 5 seconds or so. Rather than making the issue more complex
with the need of
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
Nemo federicol...@tiscali.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED
Ever
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
Steven Walling swall...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
--- Comment #12 from Bartosz Dziewoński matma@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #11)
Created attachment 13293 [details]
updated appearance of the thank tex
This looks very neat, but also very out of place on those history pages :/
--
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
--- Comment #11 from Jared Zimmerman (WMF) jared.zimmer...@wikimedia.org ---
Created attachment 13293
-- https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=13293action=edit
updated appearance of the thank tex
Added visual design for update to
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
Fabrice Florin fflo...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |Normal
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
--- Comment #4 from Jared Zimmerman (WMF) jared.zimmer...@wikimedia.org ---
Bartosz,
Facebook (like), Twitter (favorite), LinkedIn (like), Quora (thank) Pinterest
(heart)
Like I said, I've yet to see a site that requires a secondary step for
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
--- Comment #5 from Bartosz Dziewoński matma@gmail.com ---
Facebook (like), Twitter (favorite), LinkedIn (like), Quora (thank)
Pinterest (heart)
I only use Facebook and LinkedIn out of these, so I'll base my reply
on them. I was also
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
Bartosz Dziewoński matma@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
--- Comment #7 from Technical 13 technical...@yahoo.com ---
Meh... I expect to see a WONTFIX from this ticket because this discussion was
just had not long ago. I've yet to have the time to finish my user-script I
was working on that would
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
Ignatzmice ignatzmice.w...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
--- Comment #9 from Technical 13 technical...@yahoo.com ---
(In reply to comment #8)
I don't have a problem with the current implementation, but IF this ended up
happening I would rather see the thanked turn into a link reading
un-thank or
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
Legoktm legoktm.wikipe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
Legoktm legoktm.wikipe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
--- Comment #2 from Jared Zimmerman (WMF) jared.zimmer...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Introduced in https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/67591/
Thanks for the link, I'm aware of the reason why the current flow is in place.
--
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
Bartosz Dziewoński matma@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
30 matches
Mail list logo
