WMF nor WMDE maintains. It's one thing to
make new service (which btw I think is an awesome idea, just wanted to
say it so that it would be clear than I am not criticizing the whole
idea, just this aspect of it) and another add subtle changes to an
existing one.
--
Stas Malyshev
smalys
server with only one database and only one
table - why not use separation that already comes for free with another
instance? We still can reuse any code we like.
--
Stas Malyshev
smalys...@wikimedia.org
___
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l
structure would produce?
--
Stas Malyshev
smalys...@wikimedia.org
___
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
some missing parts (see https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T50143),
though dumpJson should be safe to use if you want JSON. We're actively
working on the RDF part so it will be ready for use soon too.
--
Stas Malyshev
smalys...@wikimedia.org
___
Wikidata-l
Hi!
use ISO standards. One of the reasons is their impartiality (in the
meaning that they are not related to one specific language).
Wikidata labels, however, *are* related to specific language. Every
label is associated with the language.
--
Stas Malyshev
smalys...@wikimedia.org
Hi!
What about people who were born in the 18th-century? We know they are
dead, but their death is not recorded and we only know when they were
last active. How do you set that end date?
That's what somevalue/unknown is for.
--
Stas Malyshev
smalys...@wikimedia.org
there might be cases where it is useful,
still not on references. But I think maybe not forbidding as such but
having the guideline on what is considered the Right Thing and then if
there's an exception than the editors can use their own judgement.
--
Stas Malyshev
smalys...@wikimedia.org
it does make sense.
--
Stas Malyshev
smalys...@wikimedia.org
___
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
people, neither experienced nor new.
--
Stas Malyshev
smalys...@wikimedia.org
___
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
.
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q16354757 is not Wikibase Data model :)
Which reminds me of https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1061035 ...
--
Stas Malyshev
smalys...@wikimedia.org
___
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https
Hi!
Hi, there is items about Wikibase data model in Wikidata (created by me,
but not only)
If I understand correctly, they could be cited in the semantic web as
https://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q19798647
What would be the purpose of these items? I.e., what is the intended usage?
--
Stas
://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1187613's is Уотсон. And I have no idea
what is the correct romanization of
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q4105300's name.
--
Stas Malyshev
smalys...@wikimedia.org
___
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https
once ranks are used more widely to
mark it.
I think this is solved with preferred ranks and truthy statements
concept pretty nice. So people should start using ranks to separate
current data from historical data.
--
Stas Malyshev
smalys...@wikimedia.org
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P1207
Q42 is a treasure trove for these :) Will see if there is more.
--
Stas Malyshev
smalys...@wikimedia.org
___
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman
of encyclopaedic knowledge.
It's indeed important, so I think the idea is not to diminish their
importance somehow but to give them separate space which may lead to
improved workflows for both data properties and external ID properties.
--
Stas Malyshev
smalys...@wikimedia.org
Hi!
I agree this would be a nice idea. I believe it would be relatively easy to
do,
if only properties could have properties of their own.
AFAIK they can, e.g. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P35
--
Stas Malyshev
smalys...@wikimedia.org
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P1628 with
Freebase full URIs.
I think using https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P1628 is a good
idea. It may also be useful to add qualifier of (P642) to
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1453477 (Freebase).
--
Stas Malyshev
smalys...@wikimedia.org
name may have completely different semantics. In Wikidata,
however, properties are generic, so I wonder if it would be possible to
keep context. dbPedia obviously does have context but not sure where it
would be in Wikidata.
--
Stas Malyshev
smalys...@wikimedia.org
18 matches
Mail list logo