On 4/18/15 5:48 PM, Ricordisamoa wrote:
Il 11/04/2015 13:29, Antoine Isaac ha scritto:
Hi,
Is the 'template' word so bad? Paraphrasing Daniel's definition of the
MediaWiki template, one could see a 'WikiData template' as
a set of of properties that can be re-used, e.g. to make create statemen
Il 11/04/2015 13:29, Antoine Isaac ha scritto:
Hi,
Is the 'template' word so bad? Paraphrasing Daniel's definition of the
MediaWiki template, one could see a 'WikiData template' as
a set of of properties that can be re-used, e.g. to make create
statements about a certain class. (the 'parameter
Valentine Charles, 07/04/2015 15:21:
What I mean is that it would be good to have list of properties that can
be used for a given thing.
Autocompletion often guesses well, but you can set a non-mandatory
constraint:
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Category:Properties_with_constraints
Really, in
Hi,
Is the 'template' word so bad? Paraphrasing Daniel's definition of the
MediaWiki template, one could see a 'WikiData template' as
a set of of properties that can be re-used, e.g. to make create statements
about a certain class. (the 'parameter' bit could be understood as adding or
removing
Il 04/04/2015 23:45, Stas Malyshev ha scritto:
Hi!
For things that actually *are* free text, and not terribly long, a monolongual
(or, in the future, multilingual) text property could be used. "quote" already
exists, "abstract" could be added, pending community discussion. Length
limitations ca
Il 07/04/2015 15:21, Valentine Charles ha scritto:
Hello,
Yes I might not use the right term here especially if you use it
already in a different context. What I mean is that it would be good
to have list of properties that can be used for a given thing. For
instance if you want to describe a
Well probably not, as it is an ongoing project. You can post questions
there however on the talk page that are more likely to generate useful
answers for you than this list. Most Wikidatans involved there don't speak
English as a first language and I don't think they are frequent readers of
this ma
Hello,
Yes I might not use the right term here especially if you use it already in
a different context. What I mean is that it would be good to have list of
properties that can be used for a given thing. For instance if you want to
describe a painting here the list of properties you can use.
https
I'm confused by your use of the term "template" here. In the context of
MediaWiki, "template" refers to a bit of wikitext that can be parametrized and
re-used, e.g. to make info-boxes.
If I understand correctly, what you mean is a kind of schema saying which
properties can and should be present o
For paintings you can better look here:
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_sum_of_all_paintings
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Valentine Charles
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wanted to get an overview of all the properties used boy the instance
> Painting (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/
Hello,
I wanted to get an overview of all the properties used boy the instance
Painting (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3305213) for further mapping with
the Europeana Data Model.
My initial thought that I would find a representative list at
http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_Visual
Hi!
> For things that actually *are* free text, and not terribly long, a monolongual
> (or, in the future, multilingual) text property could be used. "quote" already
> exists, "abstract" could be added, pending community discussion. Length
> limitations can be adjusted if need be.
Maybe if the ne
I think there is a case for including this structured data disguised as
text but it should go in the reference for a statement
On 4 Apr 2015 18:07, "Daniel Kinzler" wrote:
> For things that actually *are* free text, and not terribly long, a
> monolongual
> (or, in the future, multilingual) text p
Il 02/04/2015 13:51, Daniel Kinzler ha scritto:
Am 02.04.2015 um 09:03 schrieb Valentine Charles:
Regarding the dimensions, it is great to know that it is on your plate. I was
wondering is there a place where we can see the classes/properties that are in
the pipeline and participate to discussio
For things that actually *are* free text, and not terribly long, a monolongual
(or, in the future, multilingual) text property could be used. "quote" already
exists, "abstract" could be added, pending community discussion. Length
limitations can be adjusted if need be.
What I was warning against i
Hello,
Coming back on my previous email, I do indeed understand that Wikidata
wants structured data as much as possible. But you might have free-text
information that might not fit in a given property or even have meaning
only as a free -text description (abstract, quotes..).GLAM's are for
instanc
The more I think about this issue, the more I think we need a separate
animal altogether that sits between Wikidata and Wikipedia (or alongside it
somehow) and that is a quick-ref "simple mobile version" that acts as a
go-between to image data on Commons (or any other WM project). Right now
Wikiped
Am 02.04.2015 um 09:03 schrieb Valentine Charles:
> Regarding the dimensions, it is great to know that it is on your plate. I was
> wondering is there a place where we can see the classes/properties that are in
> the pipeline and participate to discussions around them?
Note however that for dimen
Hi, the place to discuss property proposal is
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal and its subpages.
We might need more people involved in this area.
Classes are regular items in wikidata and as such can be freely create.
They are, as regular items, subject to the notability po
Hoi,
I do not follow ... A quote is exactly that ... it is not a place where
things that do not fit neatly are to be dumped.
What you need to consider is what the value is of mono-lingual text.. A
motto as used on a shield makes sense.. a quote maybe, the original name of
something surely... but b
Dear all,
Thank you for your answers.
I do understand indeed that the purpose if Wikidata is to have structured
data but coming from the GLAMs sector I was wondering how our data could
look like in Wikidata.
In fact it could be an interesting exercise to evaluate from the generic
description how m
Hi Valentine,
The long, chatty, free-text descriptive element of Wikidata is really
Wikipedia ;-)
There is a small free-text field in Wikidata for each item (the
description, one per language) but it's intended for a short
identifying/disambiguating note: "1887 self-portrait by XYZ"; "Danish
arti
We do have the "Quote" property (P1683) which has monolingual text
datatype. You could certainly put free text in the value for this property
and add this to a reference or even use it as a qualifier.
Joe
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Daniel Kinzler
wrote:
> Am 01.04.2015 um 09:20 schrieb Val
Am 01.04.2015 um 09:20 schrieb Valentine Charles:
> -Cultural Heritage data have most of the time a description property where you
> will find lot of relevant free text information. The structured property but
> inside you will find mostly free- text. I couldn't find a similar property in
> Wikidat
Dear all,
Thank you all for your answers. I will have a look to the different
projects you have mentioned in your emails.
In the meantime I have spent a bit more time exploring Wikidata for
paintings as one of our project currently focuses on Art and comparing it
with the Europeana Data Model in t
Hi Valentine!
I think the Authority Control project would be of interest to you:
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_Authority_control
Am 27.03.2015 um 16:18 schrieb Valentine Charles:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Europeana.eu is interested in using Wikidata. At the moment, we are trying to
>
Hi, for France I'm also aware of the historical monuments project, that
might be interesting for you:
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_France/Monuments_historiques
2015-03-28 0:12 GMT+01:00 Daniel Mietchen :
> Hi Valentine,
>
> I think the following projects would also fall with
Hi Valentine,
I think the following projects would also fall within the scope of your search:
* https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_Source_MetaData
* https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_sum_of_all_paintings
* https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_Wikidata
Hi all,
Europeana.eu is interested in using Wikidata. At the moment, we are trying
to make a correspondence between the data structures in Wikidata and our
data model EDM [1] for digitized cultural collections.
We started by looking at the general Wikidata project page [2] and found
that the foll
29 matches
Mail list logo
