Am 09.09.2014 01:40, schrieb Denny Vrandečić:
Create a third item in Wikidata, and use that for the language links. Any
Wikipedia that has two separate articles can link to the separate items, any
Wikipedia that has only one article can link to the single item.
That's a nice solution for the
On 09.09.2014 11:33, Daniel Kinzler wrote:
Am 09.09.2014 01:40, schrieb Denny Vrandečić:
Create a third item in Wikidata, and use that for the language links. Any
Wikipedia that has two separate articles can link to the separate items, any
Wikipedia that has only one article can link to the
On 09.09.2014 11:47, Thomas Douillard wrote:
The composite item seems to be a sort of composite geographical/human
system, like an ecosystem (community of living organisms together with
the nonliving components of their environment)
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q37813 a special kind of
Am 09.09.2014 13:36, schrieb Markus Krötzsch:
My proposal became more clear to me over lunch:
For articles that are really about multiple different things that cannot be
reconciled in a single natural concept:
* State intance of:Wikipedia article with multiple topics (we already have
Dear all,
A notable side effect :
At the moment, a page can contain multiple topic in few languages only
At the moment, those page are adopted by one of the topic
It means that from now on, some pages that contains multiple topics in some
languages will be attached to new Q** and it will
2014-09-09 13:36 GMT+02:00 Markus Krötzsch mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org:
My proposal became more clear to me over lunch:
*** cut ***
Markus, yuo are of genius! (cit.) :)
/me deletes straight away his own proposal
L.
___
Wikidata-l mailing list
For articles that are really about multiple different things that cannot
be reconciled in a single natural concept:
* State intance of:Wikipedia article with multiple topics (we already
have several other classes of Wikipedia articles).
* Use some property, say has topic, to link to items
What are the implications of this for sidebar links ?
IMO it's a good thing if the wikidata items become more fine-grained and
more conceptually precise.
But wouldn't this mean we would be losing (some) sidebar links, so
people wouldn't necessarily know any more that some of the information
The language links should then go to either the composite item, or the specitic
item, if only one exits for a language.
What, if there are both? If the page itself is specific, choose specific one,
else use the composite one.
That may intrduce some foggyness because links are unequal and you
The Wikipedia article about Wangerooge describes an island and municipality.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wangerooge
These two concepts, island and municipality, have discrete items.
Municipality: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q25135
Island: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q17081143
I would
Disambiguation? In Openstreetmap it makes total sense to have 2 items for
these very different concepts.
Jo
2014-09-08 23:04 GMT+02:00 Edward Betts edw...@4angle.com:
The Wikipedia article about Wangerooge describes an island and
municipality.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wangerooge
11 matches
Mail list logo
