Names stand for ideas, so there will be the one and the only page about
constructivism and math and multiplication in any wiki.
This is wrong, in an encyclopedia or dictionary this may be true.
Warm regards
Chris Harvey
chris.superuser.com.au
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Leigh Blackall
That was a fresh and accessible read thanks Peter. I especially liked and
found interesting the 5 suggested areas of development research. There was a
sudden jump in the level of detail, but I hung in there.
BTW, have you heard of this thing called the Delphi
Peter,
Is it really about ideas and opinions? I don't think so. I believe it's
about egos and how we manage to live with our feelings. Ideas only get in
the way. I think it's time we dealt with our emotions at a much deeper level
so that ideas and circumstances don't separate us from ourselves and
Dear Leigh, i am amazed by your continous bringing up of controversial
topics in wikieducator like me and i would like to applaud you for
your tenacity. You can most certainly ignore people like Patricia and
Randy who are ACTUALLY the destructive profiteers. Thanks for
highlighting the issues
Hi Maria,
just follow my link to get more info on SUPRA. I just repeat:
http://www.edu.uni-muenchen.de/supra/
BTW, welcome to WikiEd from my side!
I've taken a look at your naturalmath.com website. Attractive layout
and a creative idea. Appealing!
As you may have seen, I'm math teacher and know
Hi Leigh, Minhaaj All,
Thanks for the clarification Leigh, thought you were referring to some
NZ/Aus specificity I was not aware of! In terms of global edu I couldn't
agree more, though I think it runs deeper than West/ non-West and it's
rather about social control associated
Your asking something different. Originally you were talking about naming.
Disambiguation would probably be a good example of this.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Disambiguation
For a good example of multiple pages from different points of view about the
same concept perhaps look at this
Congratulations for this wonderful step in adding to the global
repository of OERs.
Peter
On Oct 30, 2:29 am, Günther Osswald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Maria,
just follow my link to get more info on SUPRA. I just
repeat:http://www.edu.uni-muenchen.de/supra/
BTW, welcome to WikiEd from
Leigh,
A very wise observation. And you are correct, at an atomic level, we
have very little collaborative work on WE. The whole of WE is a
collaborative effort, yet all the individual lessons, materials,
modules, etc... are in general created by an individual and rarely
edited by another. So
I haven't yet come across any
materials that really get into teaching people to collaboratively
create materials... Maybe this is an OER that is well overdue... upon
a review of the recently published OER handbook (http://
www.wikieducator.org/OER_Handbook/educator) there isn't a lot of
Agree, Peter. It's important to project our hope towards the future
and consider the macros, mesos and micros. However, more important is
never forget to question them, discuss them, debate the
multi-possibilities. Dealing with /knowing how to cope with cognitive
dissonance and working
Peter,
You said: Come to think of it, during my masters we never took any courses
specifically targeted
toward creating collaborative works.
Well, during my masters, we did a lot of collaborative team work. We wrote
papers together and even created a collaborative WebQuest. Even in my doc
program
Peter, Nellie I guess you're ignoring my suggestion that collaboration is
NOT what we need. At least not the sort we have been thinking of and looking
to measure...
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:18 PM, NELLIE DEUTSCH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter,
You said: Come to think of it, during my masters
13 matches
Mail list logo
