gt;>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> Harry
>>>>>>> ___
>>>>>>> Wikimania-l mailing list -- wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe
worthwhile.
>
> Best,
> Harry
> ___
> Wikimania-l mailing list -- wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimania-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org
--
Boodarwun
Gnangarra
'ngany dabakarn koorliny arn boodjera dardon nlangan Nyungar koortabodjar'
___
any topic.
Cheers
Gnangarra
On Tue, 27 Jun 2023 at 22:35, Željko Blaće wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 3:54 PM effe iets anders
> wrote:
>
>> Generally a review of criteria seems like a fair idea - but I would
>> recommend doing that after the conference (ideally after
t Communications team
>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Movement_Communications
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> * I use this address for lists; send personal messages to phoebe.ayers
>>>> gmail.com *
>>>> __
rs in the movement might find
>> other arguments more important, and it's always good to know that.
>>
>> cheers,
>> ___
>> Wikimania-l mailing list -- wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
effort to help make Wikimania accessible to everyone.
Regards
Gnangarra
Wikimania 2023 COT
On Mon, 6 Mar 2023 at 06:05, Ruben Hilari-Jilalu wrote:
> doing into Aymara
>
> El sáb, 4 mar 2023 a las 4:10, Jagseer S Sidhu ()
> escribió:
>
>> Hi
>> I have translated
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>> Panel discussion
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Trainings
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Remote presentation
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tech presentations
>>>>
>>>>
>&g
Woolah!
Welcome to the 2022 COT, a great group of Wikimedians. I'm excited and
looking forward to Wikimania 2022.
Boodarwun
On Sat, 26 Feb 2022 at 06:48, Samuel Klein wrote:
> Huzzah! Thanks for the update. Looking forward to the new new mania.
> Learning to throw a wide range of beautiful
> > ___
>> > Wikimania-l mailing list -- wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> > To unsubscribe send an email to wikimania-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>
person Wikimania events.
> Should I start one?
>
> On Tue, 6 Jul 2021 at 11:33, Gnangarra wrote:
>
>> Hi Deryck
>>
>> I'd recommend that you advertise your meetup in the
>> https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/2021:Community_Village on the
>> wikimania pa
Hi Deryck
We have put that down as one of the items the team needs to consider if its
practical including what goodies we could provide. Personally I'd like to
get a Wikimania t-shirt at least...
Regards
Gnangarra
On Sat, 10 Apr 2021 at 20:58, Deryck Chan wrote:
> Thank you COT.
>
look
forward to seeing you in Bangkok in August.
--
Gnangarra
Wikimania Scholarship committee Co-chair
*Power of Diverse Collaboration*
*Sharing knowledge brings people together*
Wikimania Bangkok 2020
August 5 to 9
hosted by ESEAP
Wikimania: https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Gnangarra
offer
Regards
Gnangarra
On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 at 02:42, Naureen wrote:
> Hi Roman,
>
> I’ve begun a job now and been pondering giving money specifically for
> supporting scholarships to Wikimania. Is that an option? I’d like to help
> support for example increasing people coming from My
Would love to be part of the discussion but I like to see a oral or
intangible knowledge project to collect both cultural histories and
personal experiences to add to the stories being told on Wikipedia
On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 at 15:14, Pharos wrote:
> The New Sister Projects Meetup is a
Unfortunately its a list that will never stop growing,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Morethangrass passed today(10th August)
in Perth, Western Australia.
On Sun, 4 Aug 2019 at 23:52, Mardetanha wrote:
> I was just notified one member of arwiki has passed away
>
gt; Gabe
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:47 PM Federico Leva (Nemo)
> wrote:
>
>> Gnangarra, 17/04/19 13:23:
>> > What we'll end up with Wikimanias in 3rd world countries because ts
>> cheaper
>>
>> Is it? The budgets I've
it's an ok idea but dollars spent doesnt equate to the value gained, and
will vary between locations. What we'll end up with Wikimanias in 3rd
world countries because ts cheaper not because of potential impact. That is
something we already see.
How do you measure impact when its about sharing of
It does sound like an interesting approach I look forward to it being a
successful format, will there time at the end of the day for panel sessions
to further explore the days discussions. Like Mina I too have been working
with disadvantaged and oppressed communities to bring their knowledge,
one should be embarrassed at
>> being part of a benevolent movement such as Wikipedia - have they
>> something disastrous to hide? In which case, perhaps they better not
>> go to Wikimania at all, and if they are scholarship recipients, give
>> their place over to someone e
I was disappointed at the last Wikimania(london 2014) I went to with the
number of people wearing dont take my photo stickers taking up positions at
the front of the room or near speakers that made it hard to get images of
the room and record the event.
On 6 August 2018 at 11:11, cs wrote:
>
One reliable way to silence people when they experience harassment as well
> as keeping others from speaking out, is to have them experience how other,
> non-involved people, would immediately have an opinion on what happened and
> judge the case or the person in question. This is what has
I think the problem is that many Wikimedians are very good at interpreting
policies in to definite rules to suit their point of view, and we struggle
to recognise that the spirit of a policy is more important. When that
happens we write more complexity in to policies rather than keeping it
simple
It doesnt sound like it was good application of process, I think that this
could have been solved simply when the issue was raise with as Romaine has
already done explained and apologised his support should have continued.
It looks bad as someone who isnt there and knows Romaine that issue is be
there is a reporting component, but in some cases the benefit is not what a
person brings back, its the local experiences they share while there that
really matters. Overall the exchanging of knowledge and the building of
relationships is the key value of Wikimanias yet when it comes to
Viswaprabha highlights a reason why some people may be appearing to get
Montreal and CapeTown.
Where as Kudpung is highlighting that over time some people seam to get
many scholarship opportunities to attend, while others miss out or
perpetually end up on the wait list.
I dont think Kudpung is
Congratulations from Perth Bid team, & Wikimedia Australia to
Wikimedia Sverige
and the people who put the effort in to make it possible.
On 7 February 2018 at 19:21, balaji wrote:
> Congrats to the volunteers of Wikimedia Sverige who have put lot of hard
> work to
I think the videos are a great idea I did one back in 2012 in Washington, I
think that its important for our stories to be captured by the WMF so that
people can understand some of the people behind making Wikipedia. Our
history and our people are as important as those that we are sharing
Please
you branch off the discussion, into something like
> 'visa in my country are super easy'.
> (and this is equally valid for all other people from other countries that
> like to share about their visa policies)
>
> Best,
> Lodewijk
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 2:09 AM, Gnangarra <
Unfair to say Australia is the least friendly country as the Australian
Customs and Border protection has a whole dedicated process for conferences
https://www.border.gov.au/Busi/Trav/Conf that enable processing of visa
regardless of country by the organisors. That over 100 countries can
apply
I would think that once a location is chosen the first step would be for
the WMF to immediately open up discussions with the relevant Authority to
ensure that scholarships recipients have sufficient paperwork and time to
get approval as well as any assurances or processing options can be put in
These issues are a symptom of the closed processes that have occurred
firstly with Montreal and next year with middle eastern attendees to Cape
Town . Acknowledging that the change was because of the amount effort put
in by unsuccessful bidders was said to be wasted its showing that some
things
Yongmin
That is a good idea as it help prompt people in writing their report and we
could see a person expectation about attending compared to the initial
impact of attending. In my opinion the reporting post Wikimania is to
close to truly reflect its impact of attending, it needs to be done 6
Thank you for sharing, its never easy to open up about what you put in the
application. It will do a lot to help others learn from your experiences.
Enjoy your time in Montreal
On 24 May 2017 at 17:59, Deryck Chan wrote:
> It's good that we're discussing the hurdle for
English isnt everyone first language if there had there been no name
mentioned the question would have been dismissed as nonsense. Tto quote the
original email "*This is not personal, I am just using personalities and
scholarships familiar to me" *this made it clear that it was not directed
at
Global North/Global South is an unrealistic fallacy creates a poor
subdivision of resources it'd be better to see support for emerging and
isolated communities, given that including 2017 this will be the 4th
consecutive Wikimania in North America or Europe
Yes the question could have been
If there is a general opinion based on facts that the some individuals are
the recipients of a regular scholarship, then that is something that needs
to be discussed. Unfortunately to prove the hypothesis that this is
happening there does need to be some presentation of what the basis for
that
nada.com>
> wrote:
>
> Wikimedia contributions are public numbers. If username is known, all
> contributions can be found out. What is secrecy in that? Only thing not
> disclosed is how the evaluations are done. This should be made public,
> since the entire movement is run by public
Contributions is such wide term are you talking about edits in projects or
work on the ground in assisting others, what about the unseen work like
supporting an affiliate to be successful or a GLAM to open up its resources
When talking about edits is a photo uploaded to commons worth more because
not an opinion of Chris or his presentation for which I have no idea.
its a comment on the COI position and practicalities
If Chris has to recuse himself from the decision about his presentation
because of a COI would he not also have to recuse himself from decisions on
the other
English as a language isnt bound by right and wrong. the language, the
meanings. words evolve English absorbs and adapts from other languages.,
even within English speakers there are differences in meaning, uses and
spellings.
The other issue is one that will never be perfect for all case that is
;
> -Andrew Lih
> Associate professor of journalism, American University
> Email: and...@andrewlih.com
> WEB: http://www.andrewlih.com
> BOOK: The Wikipedia Revolution: http://www.wikipediarevolution.com
> PROJECT: Wiki Makes Video http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
> Wikipedia:WikiProjec
To quote C. Scott Ananian
> I have no idea how to concisely include all the "Wikimedia projects" and
> still mention "Wikipedia" in the title... which suggests perhaps that Ed's
> version ("Wikimania: the global wikipedia summit") or whatever
> subtitle Lodewijk used isn't too far off.
maybe we
not on the organizing team? After all, anyone could collect such
> information together.
>
> Best,
> Lodewijk
>
> 2016-10-22 12:06 GMT+02:00 Gnangarra <gnanga...@gmail.com>:
>
>> It would be nice to see past events wrapped up into one journal covering
>> all
It would be nice to see past events wrapped up into one journal covering
all aspects from original discussion until the final reporting of the event
including financials, attendee reports and media reports at the moment
everything is spread across chapter, foundation, event pages which means
Visa arent an issue everyone can get them online, except for those people
from North Korea and currently those travelling under some UN passports
due to a technical issue.
We have public transport system that works its nothing flash though a
definate must do experience for the adventurist
thanks that seams to work, its now awaiting moderator approval
On 24 July 2016 at 10:38, Joseph Fox <josephfoxw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Gnangarra - perhaps it should be wikimania-...@lists.wikimedia.org ?
>
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 at 01:27 Gnangarra <gnanga...@gmail.com> w
well tried to submit Perth bid to the email supplied and the response was;
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
wikimania-...@wikimedia.org
Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for
the recipient
Volunteer are not just precious they are the essential component both
during planning and during the event itself, also with that goes the desire
to put that effort in. WMF Staff, Affiliate Staff and Contractors while
necessary are paid its something that can be augmented as needed but not
forward or not.
>>>
>>> First, WMF staff working so we can have the discussion with all the
>>> cards in our hands. Which is not the case now.
>>>
>>> Second, what is Wikimania purposes? Right now I fear there is none
>>> clearly defin
il I have everything
> in hand. But I love Wikimania, and I want to know if it's the best format,
> and if it's not to fix it :)
> Le 10 juil. 2016 4:37 AM, "Gnangarra" <gnanga...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>> Agree with the comments thats hard to measure the val
Agree with the comments thats hard to measure the value of a Wikimania, and
what an attendee will do with the experience. so here is my experience
My first Wikimania was 2012 in Washington DC, I was a little introspective
and embroiled in an ARBCOM case I shared a room with Richard Farmbrough
That original survey was intrinsically flawed and show be totally thrown
out, the people who participated(myself included) were invited that list
was primarily constructed of people who had participated in a closed
discussion in Mexico which decided on Montreal by usurping the community
Noting that Wikimedia Australia has also expressed its interest in holding
Wikimania in 2018 in Perth, it has a number of significant sponsorship
offers already on the table all of which had been communicated to Ellie,
the sponsorship offers includes venue fees, travel costs and other
assistance
I dont see what the issue is asking for a NA track, before detailed
planning gets too far progressed, it makes sense to have the two
conferences overlap or be as one as people have limited time they can
attend if they are interested in NA tracks and follow on from the NA 2016
conference then that
worked their arse off for us all -- or change the topic
> of this thread, if we want to discuss the pros and cons of a Wikimania
> 2018 hosted by the Australian chapter.
>
> Cheers,
>
> L.
>
>
> 2016-06-28 14:28 GMT+02:00 Gnangarra <gnanga...@gmail.com>:
>
I know for a fact she isnt as she told Andrew Owens our representative such
in Berlin
On 28 June 2016 at 20:26, Manuel Schneider <manuel.schnei...@wikimedia.ch>
wrote:
> Hi Gnangarra,
>
> it is a fact that has been in discussion a few times on this list and
> elsewh
19:48, Manuel Schneider <manuel.schnei...@wikimedia.ch>
wrote:
> Hi Gnangarra,
>
> On 28.06.2016 13:16, Gnangarra wrote:
> > Thanks for the information Manuel, but where was this session
> >
> > who is working on identifying a host, where is this process tak
rocessed though, so I should be
> patient!
>
> Best,
> Lodewijk
>
> 2016-06-28 9:38 GMT+02:00 Manuel Schneider <manuel.schnei...@wikimedia.ch>
> :
>
>> Hi Gnangarra,
>>
>> On 28.06.2016 03:04, Gnangarra wrote:
>> > Great idea, also send one to
Great idea, also send one to the WMF if you want wikimania to continue
beyond Montreal, because if you start fighting for it now there wont be one
in 2018 to bring the whole of our community together, there wont be the
opportunity for other to experience the global sharing of knowledge that
you
lying on immigration forms isnt the best of ideas, if found out(small
risk) it'll see you having trouble obtaining visas for many countries in
the future.
a cynical person would think that this is part of conspiracy to drive away
community support for Wikimanias in the future.
On 13 June 2016
Call me cynical
It doesnt matter what process is published now because that process will
be adjusted to reflect what ever happened, thats neither fair nor
transparent. Just the same as Montreal was chosen first and then we were
told the process was broken and needed to be changed. This
Olatunde raises a significant issue in that call for communities to
participate in the community village is demoralising if communities dont
have the opportunity to attend the event which is suppose to be bringing
everyone together. We have the underlying principle of sharing the sum
of all
>
>
> On behalf of the Wikimania Committee, I would like to thank everyone who
took part and the Community Resources team for organising this discussion.
The Committee will consider these recommendations and will then come back
> with some changes to our processes.
>
Ellie started the
Wouldnt it be better to have redacted the anomaly and aggregated to two
remaining scores rather then three scores because other the review is
meaningless as it the anomaly in place and therefore create the wasted
effort, where an 8 and 3 occurs if the third score is a 10 then the 3 is
the anomaly
I would have thought knowing who was proposing the presentation was a
significant factor in its evaluation as that provides the critical point of
whether the person has the knowledge to speak about the issue. Such games
make the process appear to be unprofessional offering very little in the
way
I would be nice for the original schedule to have been followed or contact
made, it would also have been nice to have been conatcted about the delay
especially as a one of the people who followed the procedure in place and
started a bid of 2017, was then told that wasnt being followed but that
very irony of all of this is that the Australian chapter had scheduled a
national-semi regional conference this past weekend but was that abandoned
when the funding request was decline
On 7 October 2015 at 08:11, John Mark Vandenberg wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 7:57 AM,
the volunteers. I recall being positively surprised
> that there was very little difference between India and Berlin for the
> chapters meeting...
>
> Best,
> Lodewijk
>
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:10 AM, Gnangarra <gnanga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I like the idea
This has been going on for three days, yet not one person involved in this
decision has take a moment to reachout personally to the people who worked
on bids, They have tabled justifications on list discussions, they have
changed the status of Meta pages but not once have they given anyone the
I like the idea of distance as measure to choose the next location, but
that should also be coupled with a timezone factor +- 6 hours at a minimum
as well...
Wikimania still needs a local group to volunteers who understand the local
language and customs, it needs their enthusiasm and energy to
70 matches
Mail list logo