On Sun, 24 Aug 2014, at 07:02, Brad Jorsch (Anomie) wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 10:53 PM, svetlana wrote:
>
> > An undo with appropriate edit summary would also avoid a need in
> > escalating the issue - local sysops would consciously hold off their edit.
> > If they went against an office a
Thank you for a really good post.
Erik Moeller wrote:
>I know there are some who want to use this opportunity to cement a
>different relationship - "WMF as servant", without a say. ("You are
>the servant, not the master, and your opinion doesn't matter very
>much." [1]) I understand that - I thin
Is there a list somewhere of all currently active Foundation
initiatives for attracting and retaining active editors? I am only
aware of the one project, "Task Recommendations," to try to encourage
editors who have made a few edits to make more, described starting at
https://www.youtube.com/watch
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 1:48 AM, svetlana wrote:
> And then they draw comics stating that that's WMF's fault?
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WMF_building_wiki_wall_in_August_2014_caricature.jpg
>
> What a wonderful community (clique of active editors and sysops) we have.
Svetlana,
With a
On 22.08.2014 09:22, Erik Moeller wrote:
>
> - The MediaViewer rollout was very smooth until the deployments to
> German Wikipedia, English Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons. There could
> be many reasons for that -- but it's a fact nonetheless. I do see
> little evidence that users in other communi
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014, at 07:02, Brad Jorsch (Anomie) wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 10:53 PM, svetlana wrote:
>
> > An undo with appropriate edit summary would also avoid a need in
> > escalating the issue - local sysops would consciously hold off their edit.
> > If they went against an office a
Interview: Improving the visibility of digital archival assets using Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2014-08-20/Interview
Traffic report: ''Carpe diem, quam minimum credula postero''
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2014-08-20/Traffic_re
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 10:53 PM, svetlana wrote:
> An undo with appropriate edit summary would also avoid a need in
> escalating the issue - local sysops would consciously hold off their edit.
> If they went against an office action, introducing superprotect /then/
> could make sense
Note that
Note that while it *is* a trademark issue, it isn't *just* a trademark
issue.
On 21 August 2014 18:44, Gregory Varnum wrote:
> Thank you Richard for bringing this to everyone's attention.
>
> So folks know, WMF Legal and the Affiliations Committee are investigating
> and will be reaching out to
Hello Fae,
as far as I know there is no systematic data collection about volunteers
by the WMF, anyway, there is non that is known by the board at my time,
or ever mentioned on the board. In the first year when I joined the
board I mentioned in a mail that it would be desirable for the
Founda
10 matches
Mail list logo
