geni wrote:
>On 13 December 2014 at 02:48, MZMcBride wrote:
>>An alternate solution would be to ban automated notices. :-)
>
>Individualised ones don't scale
>
>>Or at least make them far less obnoxious.
>
>Been tried. A lot. It doesn't make any difference mind but I assume people
>will continue t
I assert that you're absolutely disrupting this mailing list. I have
banned this address, and will ban any others that surface from you or
your tens of thousands of bot—sorry, "members," intent on disrupting
the list to pursue whatever agenda it is you're trying to shove in
everyone's faces.
Austi
And you assert that I personally did all those things ?
And you do not acknowledge then IAC is an actual public movement /
organisation, with tens of thousands of subscribers all connected by
internet and with similar ideologies, all upset with Wikipedia. eg.
like Eastern European mailing list, C
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Yaroslav M. Blanter wrote:
> I do not see why I should be wasting more time for IAC.
Then please don't; there's enough nastiness in this thread as it is.
Thanks,
Austin
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
ht
On 2014-12-14 14:05, Bruentrup wrote:
And that will magically make all the infringements of IAC's IP at
Commons somehow acceptable and usable ?
If you have reliable hard evidence of disruption and "socking" by /
against IAC, carried out from India, please share it with us so that
my clients can
And that will magically make all the infringements of IAC's IP at
Commons somehow acceptable and usable ?
If you have reliable hard evidence of disruption and "socking" by /
against IAC, carried out from India, please share it with us so that
my clients can report it to the law enforcement agencie
On 2014-12-14 06:49, Bruentrup wrote:
Hi
One of those 6 successful DMCA's of 2014 was filed by us.
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/DMCA_India_Against_Corruption_logo
I would suggest to the list moderators that every poster identified as
IAC would be blocked on sight, due to the high leve
Hoi,
Chapters are known on Wikidata and so are all the GLAM partners. It is
trivially easy to establish relations between them. It allows for many
visualisations. That is how we can make the relevance of chapters more
obvious.
Thanks,
GerardM
Yeah, I blogged about this in the past as well.
O
geni, 14/12/2014 09:13:
if we can turn the
chapters into respected points of contact which GLAMs
Is there any evidence to think they aren't?
Nemo
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Please recheck your queue
The first email was sent on 28. November 2014 subject "Complaint about
images on Wikimedia Commons". A reminder was sent on Dec 2, 2014
Both these emails were sent by the "National Media
Coordinator, India Against Corruption, jan andolan" to
"info-comm...@wikimedia.org"
On 13 December 2014 at 20:34, Lilburne wrote:
>
>
>
> I can't imagine a publisher taking the risk on web images that some
> un-contactable anon uploaded. Imagine printing 1000s of copies of a book
> and then discovering that you don't have the rights to the images. No one
> does this in the real w
On 13 December 2014 at 02:48, MZMcBride wrote:
>
> I felt kind of meh about the previous thread, so I'm forking it.
>
> geni wrote:
> >2)Large number of semi automated deletion notices. This is going to happen
> >whatever you do unless you ban all uploads from people who aren't
> >qualified intell
12 matches
Mail list logo
