Has there been a discussion of timing for this? SJ (who is offline right
now) just mentioned that the Free Bassel group may be planning a focused
outreach push tomorrow through Friday. Let's coordinate with them if
possible.
On Nov 25, 2015 11:21 AM, "Gerard Meijssen"
I should have said this earlier: a big thank you to everyone who worked on
this funding round. From reading the Meta-Wiki pages, it's easy to see
that there is a lot of data to process and audit and it requires a decent
amount of work to issue these important recommendations each round.
Michael
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:37 PM, MZMcBride wrote:
> Is it accurate to say that all large Wikimedia affiliates go through the
> Funds Dissemination Committee except the Wikimedia Foundation?
Somewhat, yes. The process for community consultations and feedback is in
the works,
Back at my computer: I checked w/ Jon Phillips and folks at newpalmyra and
freebassel.org & pointed them to the Meta talk page. It sounded from a
quick chat as though they had something planned this week, but the real
question is how could a campaign like this be best directed if it was
carried
On 2015-11-25 13:27, Amir E. Aharoni wrote:
I don't remember such a... stately location since Library of Congress
2012
(though I didn't attend the recent Princess of Asturias event).
בתאריך 25 בנוב׳ 2015 13:28, "Romaine Wiki"
כתב:
The location was nice indeed as
+1 to all the hard work for the members of the FDC and Katy Love. Thank you
all for your time, attention and care.
/a
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:37 AM, MZMcBride wrote:
> I should have said this earlier: a big thank you to everyone who worked on
> this funding round. From
Hoi,
As this is not a Wikipedia article, it is more of an advertisement, a call
to action. Urgency is key. This is not about the well known patterns of a
Wikipedia article.
This is not understood, it results at this late stage in an edit war.
Either we have a point and make it or we have a
Hi MZMcBride,
> The Wikimedia Foundation has a section under "Organisation-specific
> remarks", but isn't included in the "Funding recommendations" chart and
> there's no amount requested, amount allocated, or proposal listed for the
> Wikimedia Foundation. Why is that?
They are
Beautiful video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0p8wFdnPfVw
Pine
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
Thanks Katherine for this mail,
it gives a lot of context and details, and also thanks for the difficult
work the WMF is doing.
Is the opinion of more experienced NGOs and activists that a dedicated
banner/ribbon/logo would be a good idea?
We all think that is an enormous power that we have as a
Hoi,
I have looked at the article. It does not have the necessary urgency. He is
likely to have been sentenced to death and the article reads like a
Wikipedia article. This is Meta, it is not Wikipedia and it needs urgency.
We appeal to the world to get involved to let his death not happen. That
On 25 Nov 2015 03:53, "Risker" wrote:
>
> Thank you, Nikki. Yes, about 70% of the costs were broken down, more or
> less. But almost 30% - totalling over US$635,000 - is undifferentiated
> "floating capacity" and "administrative costs". Those two amounts, which
> are not
Il 25/nov/2015 05:01 "MZMcBride" ha scritto:
> The Wikimedia Foundation has a section under "Organisation-specific
> remarks", but isn't included in the "Funding recommendations" chart and
> there's no amount requested, amount allocated, or proposal listed for the
> Wikimedia
Anne, do you imagine to publish income per person that way?
On Nov 25, 2015 04:53, "Risker" wrote:
> Thank you, Nikki. Yes, about 70% of the costs were broken down, more or
> less. But almost 30% - totalling over US$635,000 - is undifferentiated
> "floating capacity" and
Not speaking for Anne here, but in general I think all Wikimedia
movement-funded compensation should be published. This is already done in a
number of Wikimedia grant proposals, and I believe that almost all
government agencies in the U.S. are required to provide extensive data
about their use of
Hoi,
To belabour the point, we do make errors, we will fail in expectations.
What we need is not complaining that the world is not perfect, we need to
have an approach that will improve our data and is inclusive. We need to be
more of a wiki.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 25 November 2015 at 04:57,
Hi all,
As a large group of Wikipedians is going to gather in an unusual building
today, hereby a photo so that everyone can find it. ;-)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Royal_Palace_on_the_Dam_of_Amsterdam_on_25_November_2015.jpg
Romaine
Forwarding here from the Creative Commons distribution list. Please sign the
petition.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 12:08:27 -0600
From: "Creative Commons"
To: Shlomi Fish
Subject: Just say no
I don't remember such a... stately location since Library of Congress 2012
(though I didn't attend the recent Princess of Asturias event).
בתאריך 25 בנוב׳ 2015 13:28, "Romaine Wiki" כתב:
> Hi all,
>
> As a large group of Wikipedians is going to gather in an unusual
19 matches
Mail list logo