Re: [Wikimedia-l] Let's set up a Tor onion service for Wikipedia

I see your point, Gergo, but in reality Phabricator is an even worse channel to discuss projects that are, essentially, social issues. Whether or not to have an onion may appear to be essentially a technical issue, but I have yet to see any indication in numerous discussions about Tor that I have

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Update on Discovery Projects

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 5:25 AM, Deborah Tankersley wrote: > > The Discovery team structure has now changed, but the new teams will still > work together to complete the goals as listed in the draft annual plan.[2] > A summary of their anticipated work, as we finalize

[Wikimedia-l] Update on Discovery Projects

Hi everybody, (With apologies for cross-posting...) You may have seen the recent communication [1 ] about the product and tech tune-up which went live the week of June 5th, 2017. In that communication, we promised an update

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Let's set up a Tor onion service for Wikipedia

This conversation has gone in multiple directions. It started with reading Wikipedia through a hidden service. I am interested only in talking about editing Wikipedia with Tor. I feel that the negativity in this thread against Tor is unwarranted and ignorant. I can confirm that Wikipedia needs

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Let's set up a Tor onion service for Wikipedia

Blocking a registered user on TOR is not different from blocking a registered user outside TOR. 5. jun. 2017 21.02 skrev "John" : > Im not going to violate BEANS, but even allowing accounts to edit without > further hurdles isn't going to work. Because of the anonymity

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Let's set up a Tor onion service for Wikipedia

Now that we have ascertained (again) that wikimedia-l is a ​poor channel for focused discussions about tech proposals, can we move this to Phabricator? ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Let's set up a Tor onion service for Wikipedia

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Yongmin H. wrote: > FYI: Editing through tor is blocked for logged in users too, unless you > have `ipblock-exempt`. (It's included in admins and IP Block Exemptions.) it is NOW, it does not have to be - through an app. cheers, dj

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Let's set up a Tor onion service for Wikipedia

06.06.2017, 01:11, "Risker" : > As far as I can tell (and from comments made in the past by actual Tor > users), there is no problem whatsoever for Tor users to read Wikipedia > while using Tor. Editing is a completely different situation - and well it > should be, given the

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Let's set up a Tor onion service for Wikipedia

FYI: Editing through tor is blocked for logged in users too, unless you have `ipblock-exempt`. (It's included in admins and IP Block Exemptions.) On 2017-06-13 18:26, Dariusz Jemielniak wrote: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Trillium Corsage > wrote: > >> 06.06.2017,

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Let's set up a Tor onion service for Wikipedia

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Trillium Corsage wrote: > 06.06.2017, 01:11, "Risker" : > > As far as I can tell (and from comments made in the past by actual Tor > > users), there is no problem whatsoever for Tor users to read Wikipedia > > while

Re: [Wikimedia-l] What's making you happy this week? (Week of 11 June 2017)

Le 11/06/2017 à 22:51, Pine W a écrit : > > What's making you happy this week? I have been using Wikipedia for 7 700 000 minutes. The French wikipedia about [morse code] is an article I have stubbed years ago. I am very happy with it is state nowaday: