Messaggio inoltrato
Oggetto: [Commons-l] Help fund a macro lens for a Commons contributor
Data: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 12:26:05 +
Mittente: Tomasz W. Kozłowski twkozlow...@gmail.com
Rispondi-a: Wikimedia Commons Discussion List
common...@lists.wikimedia.org
A:
See also https://creativecommons.org/board ,
https://creativecommons.org/tag/ceo
It's important to note that CC has dozens of independent national
chapters (affiliates
https://wiki.creativecommons.org/Category:Jurisdictions ), many of which
are university centres/departments; some are rather
Pine W, 10/02/2015 10:13:
in order to maintain continuity
with new content
What?
Nemo
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
Fæ, 05/02/2015 18:47:
Top 10*most thanked* users in Jan 2015:
English Wikipedia:
Looks like edit wars pay back in this rank.
Nemo
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Risker, 16/01/2015 18:44:
We now have at least a partial understanding of the reason the fundraising
campaign was extended, which is found in the minutes of the Board of
Trustees meeting of November 2014.[1]
Board members asked Lila and Lisa to consider and evaluate ways to raise
additional
charles andrès (WMCH), 04/02/2015 14:25:
Is there a way to know how many people use Wikipedia per interface language?
No.
Said in other words, I want to know how many people display the Wikimedia
project interface in the different version of German and Alemannisch.
Until
Samir Elsharbaty, 04/02/2015 03:08:
It seems that the
extension already covers most of what was suggested here:
- A teacher or wiki-mentor could make a shared watchlist of their
student's draft pages.
- An editathon organiser could create a shared watchlist of all the
articles within the
Liam Wyatt, 03/02/2015 14:06:
Not precisely this, but related... Is there any plan to have folders in a
watchlist, and then the ability to make a specific folder visible (a.k.a.
shared) to others?
[...]
Has this been discussed/suggested before?
Only a few dozens times. See
If the WMF is consulting any specific entity of an individual Wikimedia
project out of 800 for a crosswiki matter, that's ridiculous, period. I
don't see why bother looking into the specific merits of the entity in
question, or the allegations about them.
Nemo
James Heilman, 03/02/2015 05:52:
not sure what the solution is.
Usually, following the docs: «use {{subst:OP}} to tell others that it's
in progress»
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:OTRS#Templates_to_use_on_image_pages
Nemo
___
Amir E. Aharoni, 26/01/2015 02:57:
By size I
mean the article count and the active editor count.
If you drop this parenthesis, the whole email is fine. :)
Article count is a totally useless metric for size; comparing useless
metrics to uncertain metrics is quite sure to produce garbage.
Erkan Yilmaz, 06/01/2015 19:02:
Wikiversity allows original research:
https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Original_research
English Wikiversity, that is. (And French, perhaps others.) Italian
Wikiversity does not.
Vira Motorko, 24/12/2014 19:40:
Is there a blog post onhttps://blog.wikimedia.org/ about this?
Will it be?
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Blog#Drafting_a_post says to
propose one yourself.
For now I see
Cristian Consonni, 22/01/2015 02:29:
A shorter version with the most important points is the press release:
[2]https://juliareda.eu/2015/01/press-release-eu-copyright-report/
There's also a short summary at
http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2015/01/breaking-news-pirate-party-mep-julia.html
And at
Itzik - Wikimedia Israel, 22/01/2015 16:18:
https://annual.wikimedia.org/2014/
I don't see a language selector. Clearly a regression compared to
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation/Annual_Report/2012-2013/Front
Nemo
___
It would probably help if you linked a description of what you are
proposing. :)
https://www.torproject.org/docs/hidden-services.html.en
Nemo
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Sue Gardner, 01/04/2014 05:23:
On 21 March 2014 13:23, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
We will update the wiki page at
https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipedian_in_Residence/Harvard_University_assessment
with more information and details. I encourage others to participate
in this as
Andrew Gray, 21/01/2015 13:35:
(Foolish question: can oldids be reconstituted from dumps?)
Yes, grep any XML dump for revision to see yourself. However, the
standard import doesn't preserve this information.
Nemo
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list,
David Gerard, 20/01/2015 15:38:
As I noted, this is a legal stick
There was no indication whatsoever from the WMF that these actions were
required by law.
It's possible they were, sure. But we are abandoned to mere speculation
from supporters of either interpretation. See talk page on
David Gerard, 20/01/2015 21:11:
As I noted, this is a legal stick
There was no indication whatsoever from the WMF that these actions were
required by law.
That's neither what I said nor meant
Sorry if I was unclear: I know you didn't. It's just a distinction worth
noting.
Nemo
phoebe ayers, 20/01/2015 23:42:
suggests relying
on*us* for persistent identifier stability:
Hmm I'm not sure that's what it's written there.
However, relatedly, also today:
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/01/26/cobweb
«The footnote, a landmark in the history of civilization, took
Megan Hernandez, 16/01/2015 22:11:
Most of them do not have phabricator accounts, so the email
feedback channel is critical.
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator/Help#Using_e-mail
Nemo
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
As for the fundraiser's duration, I believe the 2014 fundraiser ran for 30
days (December 2 to December 31, 2014).
That's certainly incorrect.
https://frdata.wikimedia.org/campaign-vs-amount.csv shows about 200
campaigns started in 2014, excluding sidebar and other regular stuff.
A campaign
Castelo Branco, 09/01/2015 14:17:
Wikibooks is for textbooks, annotated texts, instructional guides, and
manuals.
(...) Wikibooks is not a place to publish primary research.
https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikibooks:What_is_Wikibooks
That's only one language.
Nemo
Given
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2015-January/076324.html,
some questions.
Erik Moeller, 06/11/2014 07:57:
Format: Effective immediately, we are shifting to a quarterly
reporting format. This will impact our reporting, and the October
through December
Erik Moeller, 07/01/2015 20:36:
It’s my pleasure to announce that Tilman Bayer is joining the
Foundation’s Product Strategy department as Senior Analyst. I would
like to thank Katherine Maher for supporting and helping to prepare this
move from the Communications department.
Thanks. If I
Romaine Wiki, 08/01/2015 18:12:
Universiteit Maastricht (UM) reikt een eredoctoraat uit aan Frans
Timmermans en de oprichter van Wikipedia, Jimmy Wales.
Doctorate in what discipline?
Nemo
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
See
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/remove-united-states-district-attorney-carmen-ortiz-office-overreach-case-aaron-swartz/RQNrG1Ck
Messaggio inoltrato
Oggetto:Response to We the People Petition on U.S. Attorney's Office
Personnel Matters
Data: Wed, 07 Jan
Anders Wennersten, 06/01/2015 12:26:
I believe that in the area of gender-gap the dynamic could be more
complex (as in my example).
And if WMF only want to see a direct link between effort and impact,
they could miss out other dynamics.
I think this is always a good point to remind ourselves,
Patricia Pena, 06/01/2015 19:32:
worked with our bank to improve the security and fraud
protection of our bank accounts so that we can now disclose the bank
account information on our donation pages.
Great! Can these important security tips/steps be documented on a
Meta-Wiki page, so that
Sucheta Ghoshal, 05/01/2015 14:30:
huge repository
of texts, images, and other relevant details that they are willing to make
available digitally in the form of free contents.
Freely licensed reproductions of relevant primary sources are definitely
welcome on Wikimedia Commons.
We wish to
Andy Mabbett, 30/12/2014 22:53:
Where 's the best on-wiki (Meta?) place to propose this?
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/RfC looks ok *if* you have enough
information already. For instance, AFAIK DOI has a non-negligible cost
and Internet Archive uses ARK instead for this reason.
Information
Liam Wyatt, 19/12/2014 00:08:
PS: Less than 1% of our readers donate enough to keep Wikipedia running.
Your contribution counts!
I read this as shame on you, users who use Wikipedia without paying for
its costs!. Criminalising our users is really abusive. Sadly, this
latest violation of the
geni, 15/12/2014 09:54:
Not in the way that I mean. WMUK is a contact for wikipedia (and other
wikimedia projects). I've seen little evidence of it being a contact for
people less sure about where they want to go.
Sounds like a problem specific to WMUK then, which you should discuss
with
Strainu, 15/12/2014 13:06:
Online editing for images is an obvious first step, but we know there
are already basic online video editing functions (youtube) so even if
it takes a while, this should be a target for the engineering team.
Does anyone know if there are any bugs on the subject?
geni, 14/12/2014 09:13:
if we can turn the
chapters into respected points of contact which GLAMs
Is there any evidence to think they aren't?
Nemo
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Steven Walling, 11/12/2014 17:40:
I just noticed
Really? The day after tomorrow is the 12th birthday of
https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Avoid_copyright_paranoiaoldid=649
!
Nemo
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
Amir E. Aharoni, 09/12/2014 17:10:
If anybody in the above projects thinks that the MoodBar is useful then it
should probably stay enabled, and maybe even revived and installed on other
projects.
But if the feedback left by new users through this tool is not actually
read and handled, then it
Sweet.
Carlos M. Colina, 09/12/2014 22:39:
2: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Community_Ireland
Which mentions Gaeilge, but not the geography. Is Northern Ireland
included, or is geography irrelevant for the group? :)
Nemo
___
Gerard Meijssen, 07/12/2014 13:11:
At the time I learned that there is the possibility of an European tax
status. I do remember that it took several years of financial statements.
This is something we can easily provide
We already do: that's what local chapters are for. WMF is not based in
EU
Salvador A, 05/12/2014 08:05:
From your answer to Scott I read that those are only statistics from
enwiki, do you know if the same happened in eswiki or, conversely, eswiki
grow the number of views? In the last case I could assume that we are
converting English readers into Spanish readers and
phoebe ayers, 04/12/2014 23:20:
Given all this context, in our meeting the board discussed whether we
should try to raise more money now to build our long-term reserves
There is so much to say about this let's milk the cow before it's too
old approach that it's definitely out of scope for
Martijn Hoekstra, 03/12/2014 10:13:
I will automate this message for the first Tuesday of December, around
10:00 a.m. UTC. If others could automate their messages to not exactly
coincidence with this one, that would help.
Why December? Fundraising banners are up all year long. Due to the
The merciless was used in the standardised messages decided by
referendum in 2009:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Licensing_update#Proposed_terms_of_use
It got lost in the implementation in 2009:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Licensing_update/Implementation#Terms_for_edit_screen
And then the
Why does the questionnaire seemingly exclude the WMF?
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Organizational_effectiveness/Tool/User_guide#Preparing_to_Take_the_Organizational_Effectiveness_Questionnaire
If the WMF is one other organized group in the sentence A Wikimedia
chapter, user group, thematic
Several great comebacks here! Thanks Tim and everyone for this new 2
years commitment.
Nemo
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
Not what you asked, but UNESCO's recent leaflet is rather nice and has a
dozen pages on impact.
http://www.unesco.de/fileadmin/medien/Dokumente/Kommunikation/Open_Content_A_Practical_Guide_to_Using_Open_Content_Licences_web.pdf
James Heilman, 02/12/2014 21:20:
We would welcome sharing with us
Tim Landscheidt, 01/12/2014 04:22:
Also, I'm no expert on EU regulations, but I do observe that
according to the European Payments Council, it seems payees
receiving SEPA credit transfers are advised to communicate
the IBAN only where necessary:
This comparison is quite useful and got rather popular: «For all the
arcana in telecommunications law, there is a really simple way of
thinking of the debate over net neutrality: Is access to the Internet
more like access to electricity, or more like cable television service?».
Michael Snow, 30/11/2014 01:03:
One avenue for fraud that's facilitated by posting account numbers is
small payment fraud, usually involving stolen credit cards. [.]
So what all this message have to do with IBAN?
Nemo
___
Wikimedia-l
Michael Snow, 30/11/2014 19:40:
As the rest of the message discussed, the fraudsters can use the IBAN to
make a donation in order to test that stolen card information belongs
to a real credit card.
Are you sure you know what an IBAN is?
Anyway, please inform the European Central Bank of your
David Gerard, 19/11/2014 13:12:
The increase in efficiency through the banner campaign has been truly
remarkable!
Are you able to provide data for any of these claims?
If you take a moment to do the obvious thing and look on Meta,
specifically at the obvious page ([[Fundraising]]), you'll
pajz, 23/11/2014 18:07:
while, as I said, I have no particular interest in defending WMDE and have
not even read their proposal, let me say that I would find that a
preposterous measure of success/failure. You can't just look at a time
series of the number of editors and say good trend -
Gerard Meijssen, 23/11/2014 08:27:
I am really surprised how little attention this is getting.
It seems to me that there isn't much to say; I see political decisions,
they are what they are. One of them is detail detail detail; while WMF
can just throw a slogan on paper and get millions for
Moreover, because fundraising reports are now so stingy, we can't even
know the (per-country) effects of such decisions (cc fundraiser@), hence
public accountability is impossible.
*
https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fundraising/2013-14_Reportdiff=10307365oldid=10265366
*
Dorożyński Janusz, 14/11/2014 14:59:
Really, we want help and we can help, especially locals, i.e. Russian folks.
Too late? It seems the Russian government immediately seized the
opportunity of a weaker position of Wikipedia in the public opinion.
(You probably already saw, but anyway.)
Kim Bruning, 12/11/2014 19:40:
I found this document/research paper on wikipedia user retention; FWIW
http://www-users.cs.umn.edu/~halfak/publications/The_Rise_and_Decline/
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:The_Rise_and_Decline
There are events in many countries:
http://www.survivorday.org/international-survivor-day-events/ (I know
the list is not complete because Milan is missing).
As a followup to
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2013-January/123598.html
given
John, 03/11/2014 22:54:
Does anyone have contact information for the wayback machine? I am trying
to improve one of my tools for wikipedia, and am wondering if we can get a
minor change/feature request implemented.
Usually I recommend:
* #internetarchive on EFNet for quick sanity check,
* the
An interesting piece of corporate communication on the topic was
http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/we-experiment-on-human-beings/
I've expanded the Meta-Wiki page a bit, including the following additions:
* They number in the dozens and are usually documented in the Meta-Wiki
[[Research]]
Amir E. Aharoni, 26/10/2014 20:45:
In the Hebrew Wikipedia there's a discussion about the Thanks feature,
which raises the following confusion among other things: Why does the
person who is sending the thank-you gets a message saying $1 was notified
that you liked his/her edit., and the person
MZMcBride, 25/10/2014 16:16:
But again, the focus would be
integrating into the Wikimedia technical platform and fixing issues in
production, rather than trying to make Labs scripts and tools better.
False dichotomy IMHO. Usual example:*
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/42259 Quite clearly
quiddity, 25/10/2014 20:26:
We don't have HTML preview, which might be interesting. Surely it's
possible to whip up a userscript for it, if anyone would actually find it
massively useful. (Or, we can just leave the browser's own Web Developer
bar open to see the HTML. ctrl-f is our friend.)
Lisa Gruwell, 06/10/2014 02:44:
Thanks for the timely question! We are actually just double checking the
numbers in our FY 2013-14 Fundraising Report right now. We are aiming to
publish it toward the end of the week.
Thanks. This didn't answer any of the 2012 questions though.
Pine W, 15/10/2014 09:56:
Hi Risker,
I am speaking of all of them, and I suppose our mission also, although in
ways that are broadly interpreted.
For example, as an organization that values freedom and transparency, and
is for the purpose of public education for the benefit of all people, I
Garfield Byrd, 13/10/2014 19:56:
The June 30, 2014 audit of the Wikimedia Foundation and accompanying QA
have now been posted and can be found on the Wikimedia Foundation
Financial reports page.
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Financial_reports
Please contact me with any questions.
Pine W, 11/10/2014 22:05:
4. We in Cascadia Wikimedians (and I imagine other thematic organizations)
have our own timelines that we need to deal with, and needing to wait
indefinitely for Affcom and Legal to make decisions [...]
a) Be aware it's impossible to understant what you're talking
Itzik - Wikimedia Israel, 07/10/2014 09:50:
I hope next year election committee will take it in consideration.
Why hope? Just create the rules page on Meta with the amended criteria
which just found consensus. They can then be worked on from there.
Nemo
Fæ, 10/10/2014 16:44:
[...] a WMF employee make community decisions for us (such as
appointing the Jury [...]
I've not inspected the facts in detail, but as far as I could understand
this is NOT what happened, so it's a bit annoying to hear you repeat it
continuously. I added a summary to
Will they release their own biographies under a free license to ease
article expansion? :)
Nemo
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
, valhallasw`cloud.
(And probably someone else in bugzilla at the same time.)
Nemo
Federico Leva (Nemo), 08/10/2014 15:33:
We start in 30 min from now :)
Federico Leva (Nemo), 29/09/2014 19:51:
Hello,
Please join us on the next Wikimedia bug day:
**2014-10-08, 14:00–22:00 UTC** [1] in #wikimedia
The title should be WMF Board of Trustee elections.
Itzik - Wikimedia Israel, 05/10/2014 09:40:
For example, last elections there were 1809 valid votes.
And this is the issue we should be talking about: the ~99.5 % abstention
rate.*
By comparison, the
number of WMF staff this days is 218,
Since 2012 it's almost impossible to get information about the WMF
fundraising... Does someone have insight in how WMF could be made again
interested in fundraising transparency? Poking doesn't help.
For instance: me, Perohanych and Mike Peel have been waiting 16 months
for two simple and
Amir E. Aharoni, 04/10/2014 15:09:
Is it a usual practice in the German Wikipedia?
Yes.
What is the reason for it?
GFDL
Is there a policy page about it?
Probably in the neighbourhood of
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Importw%C3%BCnsche
Are there are Wikipedia projects
Lila Tretikov, 29/09/2014 19:38:
We are excited to announce that the Wikimedia Foundation now has a Vice
President of Engineering. Damon Sicore will be filling this vital role.
Nice to see this long story reach an end. Welcome, Damon. It will be
interesting to see the experience from previous
Erik Moeller, 17/04/2014 19:21:
Yes, this is part of the reason why I'm considering a donation to them
- they're definitely in start-up mode, and we want them to survive.
We can continue to handle these kinds of gifts as a very rare,
discretionary thing for now (and I may want to move forward
Rand McRanderson, 20/09/2014 21:32:
Here is one idea. A dashboard of top level Wikimedia projects
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Engineering
with
statuses, estimates, and a key to terms. Or does this exist?
No:
Jessie Wild, 19/09/2014 00:35:
One point of clarification: I'll actually be working with IDEO.org
http://ideo.org/, which is a spin-off of IDEO (and yes, Jane, that is the
Wikipedia article for IDEO) It is a separate organization focused on
partnering with people in need to design paths out
Amir E. Aharoni, 15/09/2014 11:12:
These opinions are relevant, but the way
they are presented in the watchlist is unhelpful and I feel that it wastes
my time.
If the reason is so trivial (on it.wiki it's certainly more complex than
that), sounds like something that subpagination and/or RSS
Amir E. Aharoni, 15/09/2014 13:12:
The English Wikipedia uses it for Articles for Deletion (AfD) and for a lot
of other things. I tried to follow AfD for some time, and I had similar
issues.
Issues which you still haven't described.
Nemo
___
Amir E. Aharoni, 15/09/2014 14:25:
Seeing notifications about articles in the same watchlist with these
notifications is already an issue.
There's a namespace selector. I select ns0 + talk when I'm in editing
mode and invert that when I'm not.
Seeing only the last support or oppose
Marc A. Pelletier, 15/09/2014 15:07:
On 09/15/2014 09:03 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
All the problems you mentioned I consider solved since about 2006 on
it.wiki, modernise your practices.
... isn't that what Flow is trying to do?
By making me and Amir talk of how to use wiki pages, you
Erik Moeller, 06/09/2014 08:44:
- The multimedia dev team has spent a fair bit of time doing some
initial UploadWizard refactoring and code cleanup. We've also
contracted Neil Kandalgaonkar, the original UploadWizard developer
(who left WMF a while ago), to help out a bit and provide some
MZMcBride, 24/08/2014 23:57:
Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
First, let's make one thing clear: the reader doesn't exist; it's just a
rhetorical trick, and a very dangerous one. For more:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Stupidity_of_the_reader
This essay looks fascinating. I hope to read
David Cuenca, 12/09/2014 14:00:
However it is hard to
navigate from blog to blog to discover what is going on at each chapter.
There is http://www.chaptersplanet.org/
The Planet is linked from the Meta-Wiki sidebar so it certainly is the
place.
Nemo
If you don't know of a policy which gives you the right to ask
something, why ask that something?
Instead, ask something you know you have the right to ask; for instance,
EU citizens have the right, by privacy law, to ask what PII an entity
has about them.
Nemo
I'd worry about that only after a rejection. :-) However, while I don't
know about UK, in Italy I see several degrees of administrative recourse
at the data protection authority. Here's a list:
http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/bodies/authorities/eu/index_en.htm
Nemo
MZMcBride, I agree with you, but let me split out one thing:
On 20 August 2014 04:09, MZMcBride wrote:
the one complaint I _never_ hear is that
Wikipedia has a readership problem.
Then you'll hear it from me.
First, let's make one thing clear: the reader doesn't exist; it's just a
rhetorical
Russavia, 03/08/2014 04:26:
[...] With this in mind, I sent an email to my folks asking them if they knew
T.H. or if they recognised him from his photo.[2] I told them that the guy
had stated I know his parents house quite well.
They were concerned. [...]
Notifying parents was an
WikiTeam[1] has released an update of the chronological archive of all
Wikimedia Commons files, up to 2013. Now at ~34 TB total.
https://archive.org/details/wikimediacommons
I wrote to – I think – all the mirrors in the world, but apparently
nobody is interested in such a mass of media
Was this paid-by-proxy contribution accompanied by disclosure?
Nemo
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
This has nothing to do with wiki-research-l, it's mostly about who can
pay for the API keys. https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Web_search
Nemo
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Thanks. All questions were generic and about Wikipedia, so I answered
with the Italian Wikipedia in mind. Also note that it.wiki is perhaps
the only wiki which switched deletions from voting to non-voting: the
experiment was already done, you only need to measure and interpret it.
:-) See
David Gerard, 16/07/2014 13:34:
I would suggest that it doesn't become not a vote merely by not
calling it a vote. I note all the closes that count !votes and how
the not-voting pattern on a given AFD is frequently brought up at DRV.
Sure, but calling it a vote makes it a vote. If it's
Tilman Bayer, 08/07/2014 05:32:
the Wikimedia Foundation's 2014-15 Annual Plan has just been published at
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/File:2014-15_Wikimedia_Foundation_Plan.pdf
accompanied by a QA:
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2014-2015_Annual_Plan_Questions_and_Answers
Balázs Viczián, 14/07/2014 13:53:
Imo all of the below and about 70-80% of the topics previously brough up in
this thread can be solved/actioned/discussed/amended/etc by the community
So you're confirming that they're on topic for the proposal :) which was
«Perhaps it's time that we in the
IA's legality in general has apparently never been tested in court,
A bit too generic a statement; I assume you're talking only of the
legality of giving public access to Wayback copyright-eligible all
rights reserved content.
IA follows a standard which is designed to avoid litigation:
Brad Jorsch (Anomie), 07/07/2014 17:37:
And the robots.txt for the new
version of the site denies everything, likely because the new owners don't
want the redirects or other old content showing up in Google searches. But
this has the unfortunate side effect that IA removes all the old content
Risker, 04/07/2014 00:15:
What project(s) are you working on?
Bibliotecarios = es.wiki crat-sysops.
Nemo
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Thanks for the addendum. :-)
Mingli Yuan, 01/07/2014 08:44:
The content provider label their own content with some metadata.
And Twitter/Facebook/etc will show a rich content on their timelines.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=54829hide_resolved=1
tracks this. Bug
1 - 100 of 508 matches
Mail list logo
