Il 27/10/2014 18:51, Yana Welinder ha scritto:
Hi folks,
I'm happy to announce that we are re-licensing the Wikimedia logos on
Commons to CC BY-SA 3.0:
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2014/10/24/wikimedia-logos-have-been-freed/
Thanks! This puts an end to discussions and proposals to host that logos
Thanks Yann! We will take care of those files.
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Yann Forget yan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Just a note: we can update the license on Commons, but I noticed that
the files were copied locally on https://wikimediafoundation.org/
Someone with the right
On Oct 30, 2014 6:06 AM, James Alexander jameso...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Allan J. Aguilar ral...@vmail.me wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:15:17 -0500
Yana Welinder ywelin...@wikimedia.org wrote:
To address
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:48 AM, rupert THURNER rupert.thur...@gmail.com
wrote:
The license is clear, and wmf is an expert in these licenses . So a
previous trademark is void in the respect where it restricts what is
defined in the license?
Rupert
I'm sorry, I don't completely understand
Still traveling, but let me see if I can briefly dispel some of the
confusion.
CC BY-SA 3.0 grants users the right to use an image under copyright law. It
does not cover trademark rights. The goal of trademark rights is to protect
the logo from being used in a way that confuses the public.
Hi,
Just a note: we can update the license on Commons, but I noticed that
the files were copied locally on https://wikimediafoundation.org/
Someone with the right priviledges will have to do it there.
Regards,
Yann
2014-10-30 17:30 GMT+01:00 Yana Welinder ywelin...@wikimedia.org:
Still
The most simple answer is: this is the nature of Wikimedia.
Same as: Wikidata was requested in 2005, in use since 2012.
And so many things you can name which took multiple years.
But I think this is the nature of Wikimedia. Not in rush to compete with
other parties for the first place, not in
Hi Yana,
The blog post is not entirely clear as Wikimedia logo can have a
different meaning in different contexts. Reading the blog post, I can't
define precise what a Wikimedia logo is. Wikimedia logo can mean:
* the logo used by Wikimedia:
The relicensing applies to the Wikimedia logos, which refers to all the
logos of the Wikimedia wikis:
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Wikimedia_trademarks. It also applies
to all the derivatives that carry the {{Copyright by Wikimedia}} template
on Commons. Essentially, the objective is to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:15:17 -0500
Yana Welinder ywelin...@wikimedia.org wrote:
To address Allan's question, this does not affect the trademark
status of the logos as governed by the new trademark policy:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Allan J. Aguilar ral...@vmail.me wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:15:17 -0500
Yana Welinder ywelin...@wikimedia.org wrote:
To address Allan's question, this does not affect the trademark
status of the logos as
A nice move indeed, but I am wondering why you not chose the cc-by 4.0?
Rupert
On Oct 27, 2014 6:52 PM, Yana Welinder ywelin...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm happy to announce that we are re-licensing the Wikimedia logos on
Commons to CC BY-SA 3.0:
Wonderful news! Great!
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:25 PM, rupert THURNER rupert.thur...@gmail.com
wrote:
A nice move indeed, but I am wondering why you not chose the cc-by 4.0?
Rupert
On Oct 27, 2014 6:52 PM, Yana Welinder ywelin...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm happy to announce
This indeed a great news! Thanks to WMF, especially the legal team.
Cheers
Ali Haidar Khan
FDC Member
Treasurer, Wikimedia Bangladesh
On Oct 27, 2014 11:52 PM, Yana Welinder ywelin...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm happy to announce that we are re-licensing the Wikimedia logos on
Really cool, great work. Thank you very much.
Greetings
Ting
Am 10/27/2014 um 06:51 PM schrieb Yana Welinder:
Hi folks,
I'm happy to announce that we are re-licensing the Wikimedia logos on
Commons to CC BY-SA 3.0:
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2014/10/24/wikimedia-logos-have-been-freed/
I
Practical question:
The template:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Wikimedia_trademark
contains a line: (Consider using {{Copyright by Wikimedia
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Copyright_by_Wikimedia}}
instead)
Should that line be removed from the Wikimedia trademark
Good point. That line can now be deleted from the trademark template.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Romaine Wiki romaine.w...@gmail.com
wrote:
Practical question:
The template:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Wikimedia_trademark
contains a line: (Consider using {{Copyright by
Done!
Thanks!
Romaine
2014-10-28 21:05 GMT+01:00 Yana Welinder ywelin...@wikimedia.org:
Good point. That line can now be deleted from the trademark template.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Romaine Wiki romaine.w...@gmail.com
wrote:
Practical question:
The template:
Yana Welinder wrote:
I'm happy to announce that we are re-licensing the Wikimedia logos on
Commons to CC BY-SA 3.0:
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2014/10/24/wikimedia-logos-have-been-freed/
Hi.
I found this blog post pretty confusing. It is not obvious to me which
logos we're talking about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 10:51:47 -0700
Yana Welinder ywelin...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm happy to announce that we are re-licensing the Wikimedia logos on
Commons to CC BY-SA 3.0:
Hi folks,
I'm happy to announce that we are re-licensing the Wikimedia logos on
Commons to CC BY-SA 3.0:
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2014/10/24/wikimedia-logos-have-been-freed/
I would really appreciate your help with replacing the {{Copyright by
Wikimedia}}
That is wonderful news for outreach evangelists!
A great step indeed!
:)
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Yana Welinder ywelin...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm happy to announce that we are re-licensing the Wikimedia logos on
Commons to CC BY-SA 3.0:
Thanks! A much needed and appreciated move!!
Cheers,
Vishnu
On Monday 27 October 2014 11:21 PM, Yana Welinder wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm happy to announce that we are re-licensing the Wikimedia logos on
Commons to CC BY-SA 3.0:
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2014/10/24/wikimedia-logos-have-been-freed/
Great news!
While the title of the Logo in the blogpost links to the unported version,
you link to the US version of cc-by-sa 3.0 when you mention it first in the
text (in the second paragraph). A mistake?
Alice.
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Vishnu visdav...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks! A
Thanks for the catch, Alice! I just changed it in the post.
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Alice Wiegand me.ly...@gmail.com wrote:
Great news!
While the title of the Logo in the blogpost links to the unported version,
you link to the US version of cc-by-sa 3.0 when you mention it first in
Hi Yana,
I'm happy to announce that we are re-licensing the Wikimedia logos on
Commons to CC BY-SA 3.0:
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2014/10/24/wikimedia-logos-have-been-freed/
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2014/10/24/wikimedia-logos-have-been-freed/
This is great news - well done. :-)
I would
26 matches
Mail list logo
