So Signpost discovered what is Something. (I didn't follow all the threads,
but I suppose it's been written in some of them.)
From my perspective and according to some anecdotal data I have, I would
suggest WMF staff and C-level management to start talking with each other.
I can confirm that at l
On 2016-01-04 00:50, Theo10011 wrote:
I'm not sure why we keep perpetuating this us vs them mentality.
Whether
its the action of singular staff member or the board or large decision
by
the executive, the end result is always the same and I'm not sure we
are
making any progress over the years. J
Blind, impotent rage isn't helpful, neither are conjectures about the
abstract and nebulous nature of "something".
Let's try and remember, this is the same pattern as every other last time,
most people commenting here are in agreement, this was wrong or at the
least, this was handled poorly, and a
Milos Rancic wrote:
>My knowledge about Something is very obscure. From occasional
>discussions with some of WMF employees, I know that "Something is
>wrong". I am quite serious about that. I got impression that employees
>are not content with the Board decisions during the recent years.
>However,
Thanks, Bartov - and I second the wish from Pharos.
Thyge
2016-01-03 20:22 GMT+01:00 Asaf Bartov :
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Asaf Bartov
> wrote:
>
> > NDA = Non-Disclosure Agreement[1]
> >
> > (and while we're at it, the acronym IEP opaquely deployed by Pine in the
> > other thread wa
On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Asaf Bartov wrote:
> NDA = Non-Disclosure Agreement[1]
>
> (and while we're at it, the acronym IEP opaquely deployed by Pine in the
> other thread was the India Education Program[2])
>
(my mistake: it was Kevin Gorman who used it, not Pine. I should have
looked
Let us have our movement new year's resolution be for an acronym-free 2016!
Thanks,
Pharos
On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Asaf Bartov wrote:
> NDA = Non-Disclosure Agreement[1]
>
> (and while we're at it, the acronym IEP opaquely deployed by Pine in the
> other thread was the India Education P
NDA = Non-Disclosure Agreement[1]
(and while we're at it, the acronym IEP opaquely deployed by Pine in the
other thread was the India Education Program[2])
A.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-disclosure_agreement
[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:India_Education_Program/Analys
It seams that NDA could by anything (1). Which one is something?
(1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NDA
Thyge
2016-01-03 10:02 GMT+01:00 Milos Rancic :
> On Jan 3, 2016 09:56, "John Mark Vandenberg" wrote:
> >
> > Something is covered in NDAs.
>
> I heard quite general notes, that they couldn't
On Jan 3, 2016 09:56, "John Mark Vandenberg" wrote:
>
> Something is covered in NDAs.
I heard quite general notes, that they couldn't be inside of NDAs. And they
weren't personal, but related to the WMF and WMF leading position inside of
the movement.
_
John: I hope we can have an open discussion. (: I feel that NDAs may be
making bad situations worse. There are good reasons to keep some things
confidential, but I think that more openness and transparency would be
helpful in regards to the WMF board in particular.
Milos: thank you. Yesterday I wr
Something is covered in NDAs.
--
John
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikime
We should start talking about Something.
Something is the raising issue of our movement. Its properties are not
yet known, but all of us feel the consequences of Something.
To tackle the problem, we should define it, first. Yes, we know it's
called Something, but besides the name, we know just a
In case anyone is interested, a commons version is available here:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jimmy%27s_Eyes.webm
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Ricordisamoa
wrote:
> After the latest cup of coffee, I really miss Jimbo's eyes :-(
> And honestly, they were not even annoying...
>
>
After the latest cup of coffee, I really miss Jimbo's eyes :-(
And honestly, they were not even annoying...
Il 01/12/2015 16:50, Gregory Varnum ha scritto:
Greetings,
I have chatted with a number of folks over the years about ways to help promote
the annual fundraising appeal - but in ways tha
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Gregory Varnum
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I have chatted with a number of folks over the years about ways to help
> promote the annual fundraising appeal - but in ways that did not feel so
> serious that it was out of our character to post on social media.
>
> Good ne
Greetings,
I have chatted with a number of folks over the years about ways to help promote
the annual fundraising appeal - but in ways that did not feel so serious that
it was out of our character to post on social media.
Good news - it appears this year Jimmy has participated in a video that s
17 matches
Mail list logo