In terms of specific articles to create, there is also
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Missing_encyclopedic_articles
That project collects articles that exist in wide range of other
encyclopedias, but don't yet exist on Wikipedia. However that's not
covering quite the same
I wonder if we could do a survey of readers from underrepresented groups.
Even if a group is underrepresented as editors that doesn't mean they ate
underrepresented as readers (for example women) (plus survey results could
be cited in potential deletion discussions)
We may want to think about the
English Wiktionary has made a modest step toward ameliorating the FUll Text
On the Net bias by reducing for less-attested languages the requirement
for three citations of a word in use to just one. The result is more
coverage at somewhat greater risk of making a mistake in the entry
In various research and media articles is written that in several subject
groups Wikipedia is missing a lot of articles and those groups are relatively
unrepresented.
How can we as Wikipedia get clear which subject groups are missing?
How can we get lists of less represented subject groups and
There are probably be some common trends over all language version like
we are stronger in areas like Server software and Skateboard tricks then
Fashion and Cosmetics. But to really find the weak areas you need to
find out this by each language version. And here I believe we will find
quite
The English Wikipedia has attempted a (non-exhaustive) list at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Systemic_bias
Peter
On 9 December 2013 07:35, Romaine Wiki romaine_w...@yahoo.com wrote:
In various research and media articles is written that in several subject
groups Wikipedia is