Re: [Wikimedia-l] What should the board do *now*? [was Re: Account of the events leading to James Heilman's removal]

Having worked with SPLC on records issues before, I feel it should be noted that their efforts are focused on government. Governments have legal protections that nonprofits (as corporations) do not, so the considerations are rather different. I'm not commenting on the topics beyond that, just

Re: [Wikimedia-l] What should the board do *now*? [was Re: Account of the events leading to James Heilman's removal]

Hoi, > I think one of the key takeaways from this affair is that people should be > careful about talking the law. An apt observation In context of the 'absolute right of (individual) directors to inspect corporate books and records', did the community director actually ask to access the

Re: [Wikimedia-l] What should the board do *now*? [was Re: Account of the events leading to James Heilman's removal]

Luis Villa writes: > > tl;dr: the board did not effectively perform one of their most important > roles (managing the ED); the board (and board candidates) should be talking > about how they will fix that. > I think one of the key takeaways from this affair is that people should be

Re: [Wikimedia-l] What should the board do *now*? [was Re: Account of the events leading to James Heilman's removal]

Hoi, Really? Doctors from Mexico?? That is very discriminating. The problem with many medical publications from the USA is that they are not at all about the best practices people should be treated with. Many best practices are not practiced in the the USA eg Open Dialogue. Thanks, GerardM

Re: [Wikimedia-l] What should the board do *now*? [was Re: Account of the events leading to James Heilman's removal]

Hey Luis! So, the good news is that a couple things you describe here are in the works. I think others have been discussed but haven't reached consensus or implementation, while still others are helpful new suggestions. I can't speak to all of these suggestions, but I can talk about what we've

Re: [Wikimedia-l] What should the board do *now*? [was Re: Account of the events leading to James Heilman's removal]

Excellent ideas, Luis. I hope to see baby photos soon. /a On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Andreas Kolbe wrote: > On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Luis Villa wrote: > > >- After I left, I did not sign a termination or contracting agreement > >with the

Re: [Wikimedia-l] What should the board do *now*? [was Re: Account of the events leading to James Heilman's removal]

On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Luis Villa wrote: >- After I left, I did not sign a termination or contracting agreement >with the organization, so I did not become a contractor with the >organization. > Thanks, Luis. >- My baby was due yesterday, so I probably

Re: [Wikimedia-l] What should the board do *now*? [was Re: Account of the events leading to James Heilman's removal]

Hi Doc Your sig > The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine > www.opentextbookofmedicine.com McAfee Site advisor tags it as a dangerous phishing site trying to steal information. Ploughing through the link leads instead to "a" Wikipedia web book on "health care" which is edited mainly by you.

Re: [Wikimedia-l] What should the board do *now*? [was Re: Account of the events leading to James Heilman's removal]

Thank you, Luis, for the good suggestions. Pine On May 5, 2016 08:49, "Luis Villa" wrote: > tl;dr: the board did not effectively perform one of their most important > roles (managing the ED); the board (and board candidates) should be talking > about how they will fix that. > >

Re: [Wikimedia-l] What should the board do *now*? [was Re: Account of the events leading to James Heilman's removal]

Agree Thanks Luis Many excellent suggestions. James On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Chris Keating wrote: > > tl;dr: the board did not effectively perform one of their most important > > roles (managing the ED); the board (and board candidates) should be > talking >

Re: [Wikimedia-l] What should the board do *now*? [was Re: Account of the events leading to James Heilman's removal]

> tl;dr: the board did not effectively perform one of their most important > roles (managing the ED); the board (and board candidates) should be talking > about how they will fix that. > Thanks Luis for the very thoughtful email. Managing a Chief Executive / ED isn't an easy task (ask anyone

[Wikimedia-l] What should the board do *now*? [was Re: Account of the events leading to James Heilman's removal]

tl;dr: the board did not effectively perform one of their most important roles (managing the ED); the board (and board candidates) should be talking about how they will fix that. [Also, see the very bottom for some relevant disclosures, since I've been asked after previous postings to this list.]