[Wikimedia-l] Congratulations
Hi all, Several organizations have held AGMs and (re)elected boards. Congratulations to Wikimedia Deutschland for electing a new board. Great wisdom and strength to them in their transitional period. Congratulations to Wikimedia Israel (WMIL) who reelected the board of WMIL and to WMHU for reelecting a new board. Finally good luck to Giuliana Mancini as the new Executive Director of Wikimedia Italia. Ad Huikeshoven Bestuurslid / Board member Wikimedia Nederland Internationaal / International Affairs Educatieprogramma / Education Program tel.(+31) (0)70 3608510 mob. (+31) (0)6 40293574 Steun vrije kennis! Kijk op wikimedia.nl http://www.wikimedia.nl/pagina/doneren-aan-wikimedia-nederland *Postadres*: * Bezoekadres:* Postbus 167Mariaplaats 3 3500 AD Utrecht Utrecht ABNAMRO NL33 ABNA 0497164833 - Kamer van Koophandel 17189036 ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Congratulations
Thanks Ad, and congratulation to all. Cheers! Aubrey On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Christophe Henner christophe.hen...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, I've already congratulate them in Private not to spam everyone, but your solution is much more clever. Congratulations to all of you :) All the best Le 3 déc. 2014 09:22, Ad Huikeshoven a...@wikimedia.nl a écrit : Hi all, Several organizations have held AGMs and (re)elected boards. Congratulations to Wikimedia Deutschland for electing a new board. Great wisdom and strength to them in their transitional period. Congratulations to Wikimedia Israel (WMIL) who reelected the board of WMIL and to WMHU for reelecting a new board. Finally good luck to Giuliana Mancini as the new Executive Director of Wikimedia Italia. Ad Huikeshoven Bestuurslid / Board member Wikimedia Nederland Internationaal / International Affairs Educatieprogramma / Education Program tel.(+31) (0)70 3608510 mob. (+31) (0)6 40293574 Steun vrije kennis! Kijk op wikimedia.nl http://www.wikimedia.nl/pagina/doneren-aan-wikimedia-nederland *Postadres*: * Bezoekadres:* Postbus 167Mariaplaats 3 3500 AD Utrecht Utrecht ABNAMRO NL33 ABNA 0497164833 - Kamer van Koophandel 17189036 ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising banners (again)
On Dec 3, 2014 3:46 AM, Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com wrote: Megan Hernandez mhernandez@... writes: As Lila’s email said, we launched our end of year English fundraising campaign on Tuesday. I wanted to share a little more background on the mechanics of the English Wikipedia campaign, and where we are on our goals this year to-date. Starting today, banners are being shown to 100% of anonymous readers on English Wikipedia in the US, UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Our end of year campaign goal is $20 million. As Lila mentioned, our goal is to serve more powerful reminders to be able to limit the total number of banners each reader sees. We are constantly experimenting with new methods to reach our readers and optimize the donation experience. I know I used to write an email internally every year, saying our banners are getting out of control, but that's because every year they get bigger and more obscuring of the content. This year, as usual, is not an exception. However, this year the banners didn't just get bigger, the copy seems to be more fear inducing as well. Today I had a coworker private message me, worried that Wikipedia was in financial trouble. He asked me if the worst happened, would the content still be available so that it could be resurrected? I assured him that Wikimedia is healthy, has reserves, and successfully reaches the budget every year. Basically I said there wasn't much to worry about, because there isn't. The messaging being used is actively scaring people. This isn't the first person that's asked me about this. When they find out there's not a real problem, their reaction quickly changes. They become angry. They feel manipulated. My coworker told me that he donates generously every year, which is rare for him because he doesn't often donate to charities. He said this year's ads are putting him off. He doesn't feel like he should donate. I understand that efficient banner ads are good, because they reduce the number of times people need to see the ad, but it's not great when people stop posting funny banner memes and start asking Wikimedia to switch to an advertising model (seriously, do a quick twitter search). - Ryan Lane Excuse the cynicism, but maybe automating the message to go out every year on the first week of December will save you frustration and effort. I know how this will end. It'll end like last year, and the year before, etc. etc. Where we conclude, yes, what we did now really cross the line, we have to tone it down a bit, with thank yous to those concerned, and apologies for taking it too far. I have no doubt it's exactly the same next year. So please see the email below I'll automate for the first week of December for now on. Dear fundraising team. Thank you for your efforts to make the fundraiser as quick as possible. I understand that effective banners allow us to keep the yearly donation drive as short as possible. Yet the banners I'm seeing this year leave me troubled about the appearance and the message presented. For the appearance, it is the size and obnoxiousness that bothers me. They seem to be designed to annoy the reader as much as possible. I know they only work when people notice them but do we really *have* to (select one from list: play audio/ obscure our content forcing a click through / use animated content / take up the majority of the screen above the fold). It annoys our users, the people we do it all for, to no end. Take a look at Twitter, it's not just one or two people. Secondly I'm alarmed about the content. That should come to no surprise to the fundraising team, because I can't imagine this content hasn't been written to evoke the maximum amount of alarm. But it crosses the line towards dishonesty. Yes the WMF can use the donations, and yes they generally spend it well. But the lights won't go off next week if You don't donate Now. The servers won't go offline. We're not on immediate danger. Yet that's what this year's campaign seems to want the message to be. But don't take my word for it, take a look at the messages accompanying the donations. People are genuinely worried. They will be angry if they find out they're being manipulated, and they would be right. Generally I'm proud of what we do as movement and proud of much of the way we do it. These banners make me ashamed of the movement I'm part of. And frustrated that I seem to be unable to change it in the long run, I think I may have send out a similar email to this one last year. For now, two requests. # could you please stop misleading the reader in our appeal? # could you please make the banners a little less invasive? So that the don't obscure content unless dismissed, and so that they take up more than 50% of the space above the fold. I know you work hard for the fundraiser to be successful, and as brief as possible, but please take in consideration the dangers of damaging our reputation for openness and
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising banners (again)
* Martijn Hoekstra wrote: Dear fundraising team. Thank you for your efforts to make the fundraiser as quick as possible. I understand that effective banners allow us to keep the yearly donation drive as short as possible. Considering the rate at which the Foundation and its Chapters increase and want to increase revenue, it is unlikely anybody is really trying to optimise how long it takes to collect enough money to keep Wikipedia online and ad-free for another year. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjo...@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de D-10243 Berlin · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de Available for hire in Berlin (early 2015) · http://www.websitedev.de/ ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising banners (again)
Martijn Hoekstra, 03/12/2014 10:13: I will automate this message for the first Tuesday of December, around 10:00 a.m. UTC. If others could automate their messages to not exactly coincidence with this one, that would help. Why December? Fundraising banners are up all year long. Due to the banners, there are concerned citizens who literally stop me while I walk in Milan to ask me what's going on, pretty much any time. Nemo ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising banners (again)
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Martijn Hoekstra martijnhoeks...@gmail.com wrote: I know I used to write an email internally every year, saying our banners are getting out of control, but that's because every year they get bigger and more obscuring of the content. This year, as usual, is not an exception. However, this year the banners didn't just get bigger, the copy seems to be more fear inducing as well. Today I had a coworker private message me, worried that Wikipedia was in financial trouble. He asked me if the worst happened, would the content still be available so that it could be resurrected? I assured him that Wikimedia is healthy, has reserves, and successfully reaches the budget every year. Basically I said there wasn't much to worry about, because there isn't. The messaging being used is actively scaring people. This isn't the first person that's asked me about this. When they find out there's not a real problem, their reaction quickly changes. They become angry. They feel manipulated. My coworker told me that he donates generously every year, which is rare for him because he doesn't often donate to charities. He said this year's ads are putting him off. He doesn't feel like he should donate. I understand that efficient banner ads are good, because they reduce the number of times people need to see the ad, but it's not great when people stop posting funny banner memes and start asking Wikimedia to switch to an advertising model (seriously, do a quick twitter search). - Ryan Lane Excuse the cynicism, but maybe automating the message to go out every year on the first week of December will save you frustration and effort. I know how this will end. It'll end like last year, and the year before, etc. etc. Where we conclude, yes, what we did now really cross the line, we have to tone it down a bit, with thank yous to those concerned, and apologies for taking it too far. I have no doubt it's exactly the same next year. So please see the email below I'll automate for the first week of December for now on. Dear fundraising team. Thank you for your efforts to make the fundraiser as quick as possible. I understand that effective banners allow us to keep the yearly donation drive as short as possible. Yet the banners I'm seeing this year leave me troubled about the appearance and the message presented. For the appearance, it is the size and obnoxiousness that bothers me. They seem to be designed to annoy the reader as much as possible. I know they only work when people notice them but do we really *have* to (select one from list: play audio/ obscure our content forcing a click through / use animated content / take up the majority of the screen above the fold). It annoys our users, the people we do it all for, to no end. Take a look at Twitter, it's not just one or two people. Secondly I'm alarmed about the content. That should come to no surprise to the fundraising team, because I can't imagine this content hasn't been written to evoke the maximum amount of alarm. But it crosses the line towards dishonesty. Yes the WMF can use the donations, and yes they generally spend it well. But the lights won't go off next week if You don't donate Now. The servers won't go offline. We're not on immediate danger. Yet that's what this year's campaign seems to want the message to be. But don't take my word for it, take a look at the messages accompanying the donations. People are genuinely worried. They will be angry if they find out they're being manipulated, and they would be right. Generally I'm proud of what we do as movement and proud of much of the way we do it. These banners make me ashamed of the movement I'm part of. And frustrated that I seem to be unable to change it in the long run, I think I may have send out a similar email to this one last year. For now, two requests. # could you please stop misleading the reader in our appeal? # could you please make the banners a little less invasive? So that the don't obscure content unless dismissed, and so that they take up more than 50% of the space above the fold. I know you work hard for the fundraiser to be successful, and as brief as possible, but please take in consideration the dangers of damaging our reputation for openness and honesty, and the impact on our volunteers. Kind regards, --Martijn I will automate this message for the first Tuesday of December, around 10:00 a.m. UTC. If others could automate their messages to not exactly coincidence with this one, that would help. For reference, there was an article in The Register on this a couple of days ago: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/12/01/penniless_and_desperate_wikipedia_sits_on_60m_cash/ Slashdot: http://news.slashdot.org/story/14/12/02/1528227/a-mismatch-between-wikimedias-pledge-drive-and-its-cash-on-hand Discussion of the Register article on Jimmy Wales' talk page:
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising banners (again)
I don't think anyone is surprised when the Reg publishes a negative article about Wikipedia/Wikimedia. Someone there seems to have had an axe to grind for years. But in this case, we certainly need to stop giving them the ammo. Regards, Charles On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 10:05 PM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Martijn Hoekstra martijnhoeks...@gmail.com wrote: I know I used to write an email internally every year, saying our banners are getting out of control, but that's because every year they get bigger and more obscuring of the content. This year, as usual, is not an exception. However, this year the banners didn't just get bigger, the copy seems to be more fear inducing as well. Today I had a coworker private message me, worried that Wikipedia was in financial trouble. He asked me if the worst happened, would the content still be available so that it could be resurrected? I assured him that Wikimedia is healthy, has reserves, and successfully reaches the budget every year. Basically I said there wasn't much to worry about, because there isn't. The messaging being used is actively scaring people. This isn't the first person that's asked me about this. When they find out there's not a real problem, their reaction quickly changes. They become angry. They feel manipulated. My coworker told me that he donates generously every year, which is rare for him because he doesn't often donate to charities. He said this year's ads are putting him off. He doesn't feel like he should donate. I understand that efficient banner ads are good, because they reduce the number of times people need to see the ad, but it's not great when people stop posting funny banner memes and start asking Wikimedia to switch to an advertising model (seriously, do a quick twitter search). - Ryan Lane Excuse the cynicism, but maybe automating the message to go out every year on the first week of December will save you frustration and effort. I know how this will end. It'll end like last year, and the year before, etc. etc. Where we conclude, yes, what we did now really cross the line, we have to tone it down a bit, with thank yous to those concerned, and apologies for taking it too far. I have no doubt it's exactly the same next year. So please see the email below I'll automate for the first week of December for now on. Dear fundraising team. Thank you for your efforts to make the fundraiser as quick as possible. I understand that effective banners allow us to keep the yearly donation drive as short as possible. Yet the banners I'm seeing this year leave me troubled about the appearance and the message presented. For the appearance, it is the size and obnoxiousness that bothers me. They seem to be designed to annoy the reader as much as possible. I know they only work when people notice them but do we really *have* to (select one from list: play audio/ obscure our content forcing a click through / use animated content / take up the majority of the screen above the fold). It annoys our users, the people we do it all for, to no end. Take a look at Twitter, it's not just one or two people. Secondly I'm alarmed about the content. That should come to no surprise to the fundraising team, because I can't imagine this content hasn't been written to evoke the maximum amount of alarm. But it crosses the line towards dishonesty. Yes the WMF can use the donations, and yes they generally spend it well. But the lights won't go off next week if You don't donate Now. The servers won't go offline. We're not on immediate danger. Yet that's what this year's campaign seems to want the message to be. But don't take my word for it, take a look at the messages accompanying the donations. People are genuinely worried. They will be angry if they find out they're being manipulated, and they would be right. Generally I'm proud of what we do as movement and proud of much of the way we do it. These banners make me ashamed of the movement I'm part of. And frustrated that I seem to be unable to change it in the long run, I think I may have send out a similar email to this one last year. For now, two requests. # could you please stop misleading the reader in our appeal? # could you please make the banners a little less invasive? So that the don't obscure content unless dismissed, and so that they take up more than 50% of the space above the fold. I know you work hard for the fundraiser to be successful, and as brief as possible, but please take in consideration the dangers of damaging our reputation for openness and honesty, and the impact on our volunteers. Kind regards, --Martijn I will automate this message for the first Tuesday of December, around 10:00 a.m. UTC. If others could automate
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising banners (again)
Note that there is a parallel e-mail campaign, which also seems to have ruffled some feathers. https://twitter.com/williampietri/status/539861727517868032 As shown in the screenshot of that tweet, the sender is Jimmy Wales, Wikipedia, and the wording begins: ---o0o--- Dear name, Thank you for helping keep Wikipedia online and ad-free. I'm sure you're busy, so I'll get right to it. We need your help again this year. Please help us forget about fundraising and get back to improving Wikipedia. If all our past donors simply gave again today, we wouldn't have to worry about fundraising for the rest of the year. We are the small non-profit that runs one of the top websites in the world. We only have about 200 staff but serve 500 million users, and have costs like any other top site: servers, power, programs, and ... ---o0o--- The subject line is name, I'll keep it short. Best, Andreas On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Charles Gregory wmau.li...@chuq.net wrote: I don't think anyone is surprised when the Reg publishes a negative article about Wikipedia/Wikimedia. Someone there seems to have had an axe to grind for years. But in this case, we certainly need to stop giving them the ammo. Regards, Charles On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 10:05 PM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Martijn Hoekstra martijnhoeks...@gmail.com wrote: I know I used to write an email internally every year, saying our banners are getting out of control, but that's because every year they get bigger and more obscuring of the content. This year, as usual, is not an exception. However, this year the banners didn't just get bigger, the copy seems to be more fear inducing as well. Today I had a coworker private message me, worried that Wikipedia was in financial trouble. He asked me if the worst happened, would the content still be available so that it could be resurrected? I assured him that Wikimedia is healthy, has reserves, and successfully reaches the budget every year. Basically I said there wasn't much to worry about, because there isn't. The messaging being used is actively scaring people. This isn't the first person that's asked me about this. When they find out there's not a real problem, their reaction quickly changes. They become angry. They feel manipulated. My coworker told me that he donates generously every year, which is rare for him because he doesn't often donate to charities. He said this year's ads are putting him off. He doesn't feel like he should donate. I understand that efficient banner ads are good, because they reduce the number of times people need to see the ad, but it's not great when people stop posting funny banner memes and start asking Wikimedia to switch to an advertising model (seriously, do a quick twitter search). - Ryan Lane Excuse the cynicism, but maybe automating the message to go out every year on the first week of December will save you frustration and effort. I know how this will end. It'll end like last year, and the year before, etc. etc. Where we conclude, yes, what we did now really cross the line, we have to tone it down a bit, with thank yous to those concerned, and apologies for taking it too far. I have no doubt it's exactly the same next year. So please see the email below I'll automate for the first week of December for now on. Dear fundraising team. Thank you for your efforts to make the fundraiser as quick as possible. I understand that effective banners allow us to keep the yearly donation drive as short as possible. Yet the banners I'm seeing this year leave me troubled about the appearance and the message presented. For the appearance, it is the size and obnoxiousness that bothers me. They seem to be designed to annoy the reader as much as possible. I know they only work when people notice them but do we really *have* to (select one from list: play audio/ obscure our content forcing a click through / use animated content / take up the majority of the screen above the fold). It annoys our users, the people we do it all for, to no end. Take a look at Twitter, it's not just one or two people. Secondly I'm alarmed about the content. That should come to no surprise to the fundraising team, because I can't imagine this content hasn't been written to evoke the maximum amount of alarm. But it crosses the line towards dishonesty. Yes the WMF can use the donations, and yes they generally spend it well. But the lights won't go off next week if You don't donate Now. The servers won't go offline. We're not on immediate danger. Yet that's what this year's campaign seems to want the message to be. But don't take my word for it, take a look at the messages
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising banners (again)
On Dec 3, 2014 12:00 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote: Martijn Hoekstra, 03/12/2014 10:13: I will automate this message for the first Tuesday of December, around 10:00 a.m. UTC. If others could automate their messages to not exactly coincidence with this one, that would help. Why December? Fundraising banners are up all year long. Due to the banners, there are concerned citizens who literally stop me while I walk in Milan to ask me what's going on, pretty much any time. Nemo I could do it monthly, but that would probably become disruption. I now regret that I didn't think of disrupting Wikipedia to raise a fund earlier. Then again, it's probably for the better. -Martijn ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Congratulations
Congratulation to all! Cheers! On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Andrea Zanni zanni.andre...@gmail.com wrote: congratulation to all. Cheers! -- *Nurunnaby Chowdhury Hasive* Administrator | Bengali Wikipedia http://bn.wikipedia.org/wiki/user:nhasive Member | IEG Committee, Wikimedia Foundation https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/People Moderator, Social Media Interaction | The Daily Prothom-Alo http://www.prothom-alo.com Bangladesh Ambassador | Open Knowledge http://www.okfn.org Treasurer | Bangladesh Open Source Network (BdOSN) http://www.bdosn.org Task Force Member | Mozilla Bangladesh http://www.mozillabd.org Author Translator | Global Voice http://bn.globalvoicesonline.org/author/hasive fb.com/nhasive | @nhasive http://www.twitter.com/nhasive | Skype: nhasive | www.nhasive.com ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimedia Italia Executive Director
Welcome Giuliana..Congratulation.. On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Salvador A salvador1...@gmail.com wrote: Welcome Giuliana. WMMX desires you a lot of success in this new appointment. Congrats to WMIT! Extra point for you for getting a ED with understanding of Spanish :P Auguri! 2014-12-02 23:31 GMT-06:00 Asaf Bartov abar...@wikimedia.org: Congratulations to WMIT! And it is heartwarming to learn of this final act of service by our late friend and colleague Alessio. Tanti auguri! A. On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Andrea Zanni andrea.za...@wikimedia.it wrote: Hello everybody, It's with great pleasure that I announce Giuliana Mancini as the new Executive Director of Wikimedia Italia. It took us over 6 months to select her within a pool of 450 candidates: it has been an incredibly hard work, and tough decisions were made. I'd like to acknowledge that one of the most active members of the selective committee was Alessio Guidetti aka Cotton, who recendly passed: it saddens us to know that he won't have the chance to see her working with us. But this is a moment of joy, because the Wikimedia family just got a new member. Giuliana will help us become a more mature and structured association: her deep experience and competence will be used to for make Wikimedia Italia scale and increase its impact in the world of free and open knowledge. Before being appointed Executive Director at Wikimedia Italia, in the last 12 years, she has covered several roles of increasing commitment in the field of arts and culture. She spent 9 years in a grant making foundation where she supervised the activities of a cello academy and the concerts of an ensemble of classical musicians, assisting the board in setting strategies and coordinating the comprehensive management. She participated in the board of a company in the field of Fine Arts with a mandate for promotion of a multimedia exhibition, creating strategic relationship with Italian and foreigner museums. She drafted several feasibility studies and business plans for theatres and other cultural institutions as well as for start up companies. She can speak English fluently and has a good understanding of Spanish and French, and she graduated in Economics and in Law (her second degree was completed while working). She was officially introduced to the Wikimedia Italia assembly this Saturday, and this is her second week of work. Please welcome her in our incredible Wikimedia movement. Best regards, Andrea Zanni -- Presidente Wikimedia Italia ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe -- Asaf Bartov Wikimedia Foundation http://www.wikimediafoundation.org Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality! https://donate.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe -- *Salvador Alcántar* *@salvador_alc* ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe -- *Nurunnaby Chowdhury Hasive* Administrator | Bengali Wikipedia http://bn.wikipedia.org/wiki/user:nhasive Member | IEG Committee, Wikimedia Foundation https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/People Moderator, Social Media Interaction | The Daily Prothom-Alo http://www.prothom-alo.com Bangladesh Ambassador | Open Knowledge http://www.okfn.org Treasurer | Bangladesh Open Source Network (BdOSN) http://www.bdosn.org Task Force Member | Mozilla Bangladesh http://www.mozillabd.org Author Translator | Global Voice http://bn.globalvoicesonline.org/author/hasive fb.com/nhasive | @nhasive http://www.twitter.com/nhasive | Skype: nhasive | www.nhasive.com ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimedia Deutschland: New board elected, annual plan postponed.
Congratulations WMDE new board! On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Asaf Bartov abar...@wikimedia.org wrote: Congratulations to WMDE -- *Nurunnaby Chowdhury Hasive* Administrator | Bengali Wikipedia http://bn.wikipedia.org/wiki/user:nhasive Member | IEG Committee, Wikimedia Foundation https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/People Moderator, Social Media Interaction | The Daily Prothom-Alo http://www.prothom-alo.com Bangladesh Ambassador | Open Knowledge http://www.okfn.org Treasurer | Bangladesh Open Source Network (BdOSN) http://www.bdosn.org Task Force Member | Mozilla Bangladesh http://www.mozillabd.org Author Translator | Global Voice http://bn.globalvoicesonline.org/author/hasive fb.com/nhasive | @nhasive http://www.twitter.com/nhasive | Skype: nhasive | www.nhasive.com ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wikimedia-l] edited mercilessly
Hi, I have a vague recollection that when I started editing the English Wikipedia ten years ago, there was a notice near the Save button, which said something like this: Your changes will be edited mercilessly. I remember similar notices in other languages as well, though even more vaguely. I don't see it now. I checked English, Hebrew and Russian. Does anybody know why was it removed? Did the editors communities just decide independently to remove it for whatever reason? If it was, I'd love to see links to discussions if anybody has them. Or was it a design decision by the Foundation? Thanks! -- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com “We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising banners (again)
Nicely put Martijn. Many a true word is spoken in jest. Dear WMF Fundraising team, please do not take this thread (or this email) as an attack on yourselves or the professionalism that you apply to your work. You should continue to take great personal pride in the crucial role you play to make our [puzzle-]globe keep spinning each year! I also appreciate that you're in a sticky position of needing to try new things but also receiving flak when you do. Perhaps as a practical suggestion, so we can avoid this discussion happening *again *next year, it would be worth all of us collaborating here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fundraising_principles Perhaps it is worthwhile adding a section to this page which lists the more practical expectations about the fundraising banners which we have developed by consensus over the years. Things like no animations/sounds, no obscuring of the content, no popups and no threats/warnings without genuine cause. I'd personally like to add two more things: - easily dismissible on mobile (because I've unintentionally clicked the banner with my finger many times when trying to press the impossibly-small x icon to dismiss the banner on my phone) and - Tell the OTRS team and appropriate Chapter (when applicable) when any major change (such as adding/removing a new payment method) happens in that language/country. These Fundraising principles, according to that Meta page, are from ...an October, 2010 letter https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:Wikimedia_fundraising_principles and a January, 2012 WMF resolution https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Resolution:Developing_Scenarios_for_future_of_fundraising#Guidelines_for_Funds_Distribution_Scenarios. The page itself was primarily edited by WMF Board of Trustees Stu and SJ. I would argue that it is possible that several of these principles are not being followed, at least according to the recent discussions on this list. Including: - *Transparency*: All Wikimedia fundraising activities must be truthful with prospective donor. Instead, the public seems to be questioning if the messages are truthful about our financial stability. - *Maximal Participation*: ...we should empower individuals and groups world-wide to constructively contribute to direct messaging. Instead, rather than being ambassadors for our mission, wikimedians are feeling increasingly embarrassed when their friends/public ask about the fundraising campaign. -*Minimal disruption*: ...causing minimal disruption and annoyance for users of the projects Instead, a desire to finish fundraising quickly is given higher priority. Even though that is *not *one of the stated principles. -*Internationalism*: ...our fundraising practices must support the easiest possible transfer of money internationally. Instead, we've had the recent discussions about how donating is difficult from the Netherlands and impossible from Russia [did they get a response yet, by the way?] I'd also add that I'll keep it short as a subject-line for the fundraising email feels to me like an Americanism that would be far too casual to be taken seriously in many other cultures. -Liam On 3 December 2014 at 10:13, Martijn Hoekstra martijnhoeks...@gmail.com wrote: On Dec 3, 2014 3:46 AM, Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com wrote: Megan Hernandez mhernandez@... writes: As Lila’s email said, we launched our end of year English fundraising campaign on Tuesday. I wanted to share a little more background on the mechanics of the English Wikipedia campaign, and where we are on our goals this year to-date. Starting today, banners are being shown to 100% of anonymous readers on English Wikipedia in the US, UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Our end of year campaign goal is $20 million. As Lila mentioned, our goal is to serve more powerful reminders to be able to limit the total number of banners each reader sees. We are constantly experimenting with new methods to reach our readers and optimize the donation experience. I know I used to write an email internally every year, saying our banners are getting out of control, but that's because every year they get bigger and more obscuring of the content. This year, as usual, is not an exception. However, this year the banners didn't just get bigger, the copy seems to be more fear inducing as well. Today I had a coworker private message me, worried that Wikipedia was in financial trouble. He asked me if the worst happened, would the content still be available so that it could be resurrected? I assured him that Wikimedia is healthy, has reserves, and successfully reaches the budget every year. Basically I said there wasn't much to worry about, because there isn't. The messaging being used is actively scaring people. This isn't the first person that's asked me about this. When they find out there's not a real problem, their reaction quickly changes. They become angry. They feel
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Appointment of Delphine Ménard, Lodewijk Gelauff and Bence Damokos as AffCom Advisers
Congratulations! On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Isabella Apriyana isabella.apriy...@wikimedia.or.id wrote: Congratulations! -- *Nurunnaby Chowdhury Hasive* Administrator | Bengali Wikipedia http://bn.wikipedia.org/wiki/user:nhasive Member | IEG Committee, Wikimedia Foundation https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/People Moderator, Social Media Interaction | The Daily Prothom-Alo http://www.prothom-alo.com Bangladesh Ambassador | Open Knowledge http://www.okfn.org Treasurer | Bangladesh Open Source Network (BdOSN) http://www.bdosn.org Task Force Member | Mozilla Bangladesh http://www.mozillabd.org Author Translator | Global Voice http://bn.globalvoicesonline.org/author/hasive fb.com/nhasive | @nhasive http://www.twitter.com/nhasive | Skype: nhasive | www.nhasive.com ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] edited mercilessly
... Oh, actually now I see at the top of the English Wikipedia source editing page: Work submitted to Wikipedia can be edited, used, and redistributed—by anyone—subject to certain terms and conditions. As far I recall, however, it was near the Save button, and it definitely said something more hard-core, like it will be edited mercilessly. And I can't find anything like that in the Visual Editor. -- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com “We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore 2014-12-03 15:08 GMT+02:00 Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il: Hi, I have a vague recollection that when I started editing the English Wikipedia ten years ago, there was a notice near the Save button, which said something like this: Your changes will be edited mercilessly. I remember similar notices in other languages as well, though even more vaguely. I don't see it now. I checked English, Hebrew and Russian. Does anybody know why was it removed? Did the editors communities just decide independently to remove it for whatever reason? If it was, I'd love to see links to discussions if anybody has them. Or was it a design decision by the Foundation? Thanks! -- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com “We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] edited mercilessly
I remember edited mercilessly as well... The current message is from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Editpage-head-copy-warn and dates from 2012. I wonder if this was changed when the ToU came in? An unscientific hint is that posters to the Wikimedia mailing lists more or less stopped using mercilessly in 2009 ;-) Andrew. On 3 December 2014 at 13:11, Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote: ... Oh, actually now I see at the top of the English Wikipedia source editing page: Work submitted to Wikipedia can be edited, used, and redistributed—by anyone—subject to certain terms and conditions. As far I recall, however, it was near the Save button, and it definitely said something more hard-core, like it will be edited mercilessly. And I can't find anything like that in the Visual Editor. -- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com “We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore 2014-12-03 15:08 GMT+02:00 Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il: Hi, I have a vague recollection that when I started editing the English Wikipedia ten years ago, there was a notice near the Save button, which said something like this: Your changes will be edited mercilessly. I remember similar notices in other languages as well, though even more vaguely. I don't see it now. I checked English, Hebrew and Russian. Does anybody know why was it removed? Did the editors communities just decide independently to remove it for whatever reason? If it was, I'd love to see links to discussions if anybody has them. Or was it a design decision by the Foundation? Thanks! -- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com “We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimedia Italia Executive Director
Hello everybody, I am very glad to be part of Wikimedia world. I would like to thank you all for your warm welcome and for your availability. I will be delighted to get to know you and work with you. Ciao a tutti, Giuliana Welcome Giuliana..Congratulation.. On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Salvador A salvador1...@gmail.com wrote: Welcome Giuliana. WMMX desires you a lot of success in this new appointment. Congrats to WMIT! Extra point for you for getting a ED with understanding of Spanish :P Auguri! 2014-12-02 23:31 GMT-06:00 Asaf Bartov abar...@wikimedia.org: Congratulations to WMIT! And it is heartwarming to learn of this final act of service by our late friend and colleague Alessio. Tanti auguri! A. On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Andrea Zanni andrea.za...@wikimedia.it wrote: Hello everybody, It's with great pleasure that I announce Giuliana Mancini as the new Executive Director of Wikimedia Italia. It took us over 6 months to select her within a pool of 450 candidates: it has been an incredibly hard work, and tough decisions were made. I'd like to acknowledge that one of the most active members of the selective committee was Alessio Guidetti aka Cotton, who recendly passed: it saddens us to know that he won't have the chance to see her working with us. But this is a moment of joy, because the Wikimedia family just got a new member. Giuliana will help us become a more mature and structured association: her deep experience and competence will be used to for make Wikimedia Italia scale and increase its impact in the world of free and open knowledge. Before being appointed Executive Director at Wikimedia Italia, in the last 12 years, she has covered several roles of increasing commitment in the field of arts and culture. She spent 9 years in a grant making foundation where she supervised the activities of a cello academy and the concerts of an ensemble of classical musicians, assisting the board in setting strategies and coordinating the comprehensive management. She participated in the board of a company in the field of Fine Arts with a mandate for promotion of a multimedia exhibition, creating strategic relationship with Italian and foreigner museums. She drafted several feasibility studies and business plans for theatres and other cultural institutions as well as for start up companies. She can speak English fluently and has a good understanding of Spanish and French, and she graduated in Economics and in Law (her second degree was completed while working). She was officially introduced to the Wikimedia Italia assembly this Saturday, and this is her second week of work. Please welcome her in our incredible Wikimedia movement. Best regards, Andrea Zanni -- Presidente Wikimedia Italia ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe -- Asaf Bartov Wikimedia Foundation http://www.wikimediafoundation.org Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality! https://donate.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe -- *Salvador Alcántar* *@salvador_alc* ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe -- *Nurunnaby Chowdhury Hasive* Administrator | Bengali Wikipedia http://bn.wikipedia.org/wiki/user:nhasive Member | IEG Committee, Wikimedia Foundation https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/People Moderator, Social Media Interaction | The Daily Prothom-Alo http://www.prothom-alo.com Bangladesh Ambassador | Open Knowledge http://www.okfn.org Treasurer | Bangladesh Open Source Network (BdOSN) http://www.bdosn.org Task Force Member | Mozilla Bangladesh http://www.mozillabd.org Author Translator | Global Voice http://bn.globalvoicesonline.org/author/hasive fb.com/nhasive | @nhasive http://www.twitter.com/nhasive | Skype: nhasive | www.nhasive.com ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list,
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Appointment of Delphine Ménard, Lodewijk Gelauff and Bence Damokos as AffCom Advisers
Delphine Ménard], Lodewijk Gelauff, and Bence Damokos, Thank you all for offering your services to the wikimedia movement to give your expertise to this important committee. Warm regards, Sydney Sydney Poore User:FloNight Wikipedian in Residence at Cochrane Collaboration On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Carlos M. Colina ma...@wikimedia.org.ve wrote: Dear all, Recently the Affiliations Commitee, in order to improve its governance and in its need for improvement and organizational advise, voted in favor of appointing Delphine Ménard [1], Lodewijk Gelauff [2] and Bence Damokos [3] as non-voting advisers . They have provided this committee during their respective tenures as full members of this committee with invaluable expertise, governance advise and language and communication skills. Hence, this committee has decided to appoint them as advisers for a term ending on Deceber 31, 2016. Many thanks in advance to Delphine, Lodewijk and Bence for their contributions and support to the Affiliations Committee. And of course, congratulations! Best regards, Carlos 1: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Affiliations_Committee/ Resolutions/Appointment_of_Delphine_M%C3%A9nard_as_ adviser_%E2%80%93_November_2014 2: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Affiliations_Committee/ Resolutions/Appointment_of_Delphine_M%C3%A9nard_as_ adviser_%E2%80%93_November_2014 3: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Affiliations_Committee/ Resolutions/Appointment_of_Bence_Damokos_as_adviser_%E2% 80%93_November_2014 -- *Jülüjain wane mmakat* ein kapülain tü alijunakalirua jee wayuukanairua junain ekerolaa alümüin supüshuwayale etijaanaka. Ayatashi waya junain. Carlos M. Colina Socio, A.C. Wikimedia Venezuela | RIF J-40129321-2 | www.wikimedia.org.ve http://wikimedia.org.ve Chair, Wikimedia Foundation Affiliations Committee Phone: +972-52-4869915 Twitter: @maor_x ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising banners (again)
No response yet :( 2014-12-03 16:09 GMT+03:00 Liam Wyatt liamwy...@gmail.com: -*Internationalism*: ...our fundraising practices must support the easiest possible transfer of money internationally. Instead, we've had the recent discussions about how donating is difficult from the Netherlands and impossible from Russia [did they get a response yet, by the way?] I'd also add that I'll keep it short as a subject-line for the fundraising email feels to me like an Americanism that would be far too casual to be taken seriously in many other cultures. -Liam ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising banners (again)
Hoi. The chapters are not relevant here. It is only the WMF who raises funds. With more chapters the public is better served. Now THAT is worth the money we are asking for. Also the fundraising is NOT for Wikipedia. It is for the whole of our movement and for all of our products. Thanks, GerardM On 3 December 2014 at 11:33, Bjoern Hoehrmann derhoe...@gmx.net wrote: * Martijn Hoekstra wrote: Dear fundraising team. Thank you for your efforts to make the fundraiser as quick as possible. I understand that effective banners allow us to keep the yearly donation drive as short as possible. Considering the rate at which the Foundation and its Chapters increase and want to increase revenue, it is unlikely anybody is really trying to optimise how long it takes to collect enough money to keep Wikipedia online and ad-free for another year. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjo...@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de D-10243 Berlin · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de Available for hire in Berlin (early 2015) · http://www.websitedev.de/ ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] edited mercilessly
Hello, This text has been a part of the five pillars for a long time. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Five_pillars Wikipedia is free content that anyone can use, edit, and distribute: Since all editors freely license their work to the public, no editor owns an article and any contributions can and will be mercilessly edited and redistributed. Respect copyright laws, and never plagiarize from sources. Borrowing non-free media is sometimes allowed as fair use, but strive to find free alternatives first. yours, On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk wrote: I remember edited mercilessly as well... The current message is from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Editpage-head-copy-warn and dates from 2012. I wonder if this was changed when the ToU came in? An unscientific hint is that posters to the Wikimedia mailing lists more or less stopped using mercilessly in 2009 ;-) Andrew. On 3 December 2014 at 13:11, Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote: ... Oh, actually now I see at the top of the English Wikipedia source editing page: Work submitted to Wikipedia can be edited, used, and redistributed—by anyone—subject to certain terms and conditions. As far I recall, however, it was near the Save button, and it definitely said something more hard-core, like it will be edited mercilessly. And I can't find anything like that in the Visual Editor. -- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com “We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore 2014-12-03 15:08 GMT+02:00 Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il : Hi, I have a vague recollection that when I started editing the English Wikipedia ten years ago, there was a notice near the Save button, which said something like this: Your changes will be edited mercilessly. I remember similar notices in other languages as well, though even more vaguely. I don't see it now. I checked English, Hebrew and Russian. Does anybody know why was it removed? Did the editors communities just decide independently to remove it for whatever reason? If it was, I'd love to see links to discussions if anybody has them. Or was it a design decision by the Foundation? Thanks! -- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com “We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe -- Lane Rasberry user:bluerasberry on Wikipedia 206.801.0814 l...@bluerasberry.com ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising banners (again)
Good points. Many people feel sincere gratitude towards Wikipedia, and its volunteer writers. I would suggest that the fundraising messages could *also* mention that another way people can express their gratitude to Wikipedia would be to become contributors themselves. On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Liam Wyatt liamwy...@gmail.com wrote: Nicely put Martijn. Many a true word is spoken in jest. Dear WMF Fundraising team, please do not take this thread (or this email) as an attack on yourselves or the professionalism that you apply to your work. You should continue to take great personal pride in the crucial role you play to make our [puzzle-]globe keep spinning each year! I also appreciate that you're in a sticky position of needing to try new things but also receiving flak when you do. Perhaps as a practical suggestion, so we can avoid this discussion happening *again *next year, it would be worth all of us collaborating here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fundraising_principles Perhaps it is worthwhile adding a section to this page which lists the more practical expectations about the fundraising banners which we have developed by consensus over the years. Things like no animations/sounds, no obscuring of the content, no popups and no threats/warnings without genuine cause. I'd personally like to add two more things: - easily dismissible on mobile (because I've unintentionally clicked the banner with my finger many times when trying to press the impossibly-small x icon to dismiss the banner on my phone) and - Tell the OTRS team and appropriate Chapter (when applicable) when any major change (such as adding/removing a new payment method) happens in that language/country. These Fundraising principles, according to that Meta page, are from ...an October, 2010 letter https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:Wikimedia_fundraising_principles and a January, 2012 WMF resolution https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Resolution:Developing_Scenarios_for_future_of_fundraising#Guidelines_for_Funds_Distribution_Scenarios . The page itself was primarily edited by WMF Board of Trustees Stu and SJ. I would argue that it is possible that several of these principles are not being followed, at least according to the recent discussions on this list. Including: - *Transparency*: All Wikimedia fundraising activities must be truthful with prospective donor. Instead, the public seems to be questioning if the messages are truthful about our financial stability. - *Maximal Participation*: ...we should empower individuals and groups world-wide to constructively contribute to direct messaging. Instead, rather than being ambassadors for our mission, wikimedians are feeling increasingly embarrassed when their friends/public ask about the fundraising campaign. -*Minimal disruption*: ...causing minimal disruption and annoyance for users of the projects Instead, a desire to finish fundraising quickly is given higher priority. Even though that is *not *one of the stated principles. -*Internationalism*: ...our fundraising practices must support the easiest possible transfer of money internationally. Instead, we've had the recent discussions about how donating is difficult from the Netherlands and impossible from Russia [did they get a response yet, by the way?] I'd also add that I'll keep it short as a subject-line for the fundraising email feels to me like an Americanism that would be far too casual to be taken seriously in many other cultures. -Liam On 3 December 2014 at 10:13, Martijn Hoekstra martijnhoeks...@gmail.com wrote: On Dec 3, 2014 3:46 AM, Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com wrote: Megan Hernandez mhernandez@... writes: As Lila’s email said, we launched our end of year English fundraising campaign on Tuesday. I wanted to share a little more background on the mechanics of the English Wikipedia campaign, and where we are on our goals this year to-date. Starting today, banners are being shown to 100% of anonymous readers on English Wikipedia in the US, UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Our end of year campaign goal is $20 million. As Lila mentioned, our goal is to serve more powerful reminders to be able to limit the total number of banners each reader sees. We are constantly experimenting with new methods to reach our readers and optimize the donation experience. I know I used to write an email internally every year, saying our banners are getting out of control, but that's because every year they get bigger and more obscuring of the content. This year, as usual, is not an exception. However, this year the banners didn't just get bigger, the copy seems to be more fear inducing as well. Today I had a coworker private message me, worried that Wikipedia was in financial trouble. He asked me if the worst happened, would the content still be
Re: [Wikimedia-l] edited mercilessly
The merciless was used in the standardised messages decided by referendum in 2009: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Licensing_update#Proposed_terms_of_use It got lost in the implementation in 2009: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Licensing_update/Implementation#Terms_for_edit_screen And then the message was removed without many ceremonies in 2012: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T44491 That said, many wikis (and sometimes even the WMF) edit or replace the global messaging (wikimedia-copyrightwarning and formerly also wikimedia-editpage-tos-summary) in ways which don't comply with global consensus. Nemo ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] edited mercilessly
On 3 December 2014 at 05:08, Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote: Hi, I have a vague recollection that when I started editing the English Wikipedia ten years ago, there was a notice near the Save button, which said something like this: Your changes will be edited mercilessly. I remember similar notices in other languages as well, though even more vaguely. I don't see it now. I checked English, Hebrew and Russian. Does anybody know why was it removed? Did the editors communities just decide independently to remove it for whatever reason? If it was, I'd love to see links to discussions if anybody has them. Or was it a design decision by the Foundation? The messages in question are copyrightwarning https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/diffusion/MW/browse/master/languages/i18n/en.json;2e2958d6d9107fcc479183eaf2dc86247f87072e$650 and copyrightwarning2 https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/diffusion/MW/browse/master/languages/i18n/en.json;2e2958d6d9107fcc479183eaf2dc86247f87072e$651 in MediaWiki core, which still use this term. However, as Nemo says, Wikimedia cluster wikis use a different message provided by the WikimediaMessages extension that doesn't currently include the term. I imagine it fell foul of the work to make the language simple and easy to understand when those were written. J. -- James D. Forrester Product Manager, Editing Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. jforres...@wikimedia.org | @jdforrester ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] edited mercilessly
It's still on the WIkimedia UK wiki, but only visible when you are in the edit window (as below). I always thought it was really harsh and unwelcoming. Please note that all contributions to Wikimedia UK are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike (see Wikimedia:Copyrights https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/Wikimedia:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. *Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!* On 3 December 2014 at 16:42, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote: The merciless was used in the standardised messages decided by referendum in 2009: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Licensing_update# Proposed_terms_of_use It got lost in the implementation in 2009: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Licensing_update/Implementation#Terms_for_edit_screen And then the message was removed without many ceremonies in 2012: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T44491 That said, many wikis (and sometimes even the WMF) edit or replace the global messaging (wikimedia-copyrightwarning and formerly also wikimedia-editpage-tos-summary) in ways which don't comply with global consensus. Nemo ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe -- Stevie Benton Head of External Relations Wikimedia UK +44 (0) 20 7065 0993 / +44 (0) 7803 505 173 @StevieBenton Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimedia Italia Executive Director
Congratulations Giuliana! Tanweer Wikimedia Bangladesh On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 8:09 PM, direttore-gener...@wikimedia.it wrote: Hello everybody, I am very glad to be part of Wikimedia world. I would like to thank you all for your warm welcome and for your availability. I will be delighted to get to know you and work with you. Ciao a tutti, Giuliana Welcome Giuliana..Congratulation.. On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Salvador A salvador1...@gmail.com wrote: Welcome Giuliana. WMMX desires you a lot of success in this new appointment. Congrats to WMIT! Extra point for you for getting a ED with understanding of Spanish :P Auguri! 2014-12-02 23:31 GMT-06:00 Asaf Bartov abar...@wikimedia.org: Congratulations to WMIT! And it is heartwarming to learn of this final act of service by our late friend and colleague Alessio. Tanti auguri! A. On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Andrea Zanni andrea.za...@wikimedia.it wrote: Hello everybody, It's with great pleasure that I announce Giuliana Mancini as the new Executive Director of Wikimedia Italia. It took us over 6 months to select her within a pool of 450 candidates: it has been an incredibly hard work, and tough decisions were made. I'd like to acknowledge that one of the most active members of the selective committee was Alessio Guidetti aka Cotton, who recendly passed: it saddens us to know that he won't have the chance to see her working with us. But this is a moment of joy, because the Wikimedia family just got a new member. Giuliana will help us become a more mature and structured association: her deep experience and competence will be used to for make Wikimedia Italia scale and increase its impact in the world of free and open knowledge. Before being appointed Executive Director at Wikimedia Italia, in the last 12 years, she has covered several roles of increasing commitment in the field of arts and culture. She spent 9 years in a grant making foundation where she supervised the activities of a cello academy and the concerts of an ensemble of classical musicians, assisting the board in setting strategies and coordinating the comprehensive management. She participated in the board of a company in the field of Fine Arts with a mandate for promotion of a multimedia exhibition, creating strategic relationship with Italian and foreigner museums. She drafted several feasibility studies and business plans for theatres and other cultural institutions as well as for start up companies. She can speak English fluently and has a good understanding of Spanish and French, and she graduated in Economics and in Law (her second degree was completed while working). She was officially introduced to the Wikimedia Italia assembly this Saturday, and this is her second week of work. Please welcome her in our incredible Wikimedia movement. Best regards, Andrea Zanni -- Presidente Wikimedia Italia ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org ?subject=unsubscribe -- Asaf Bartov Wikimedia Foundation http://www.wikimediafoundation.org Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality! https://donate.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l , mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe -- *Salvador Alcántar* *@salvador_alc* ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe -- *Nurunnaby Chowdhury Hasive* Administrator | Bengali Wikipedia http://bn.wikipedia.org/wiki/user:nhasive Member | IEG Committee, Wikimedia Foundation https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/People Moderator, Social Media Interaction | The Daily Prothom-Alo http://www.prothom-alo.com Bangladesh Ambassador | Open Knowledge http://www.okfn.org Treasurer | Bangladesh Open Source Network (BdOSN) http://www.bdosn.org Task Force Member | Mozilla
Re: [Wikimedia-l] WHO interested in evidence on the impact of CC licensing
Hi James, I have be trying to convince the World Health Organization to go to a CC BY SA license for a few years now. Najeeb Al-Shorbaji Director of Knowledge, Ethics and Research at WHO states: https://dgroups.org/hifa2015/discussions/35152a41 We would welcome sharing with us some evidence-based research on how licensing works under the Creative Commons attribution licence has made an impact in the area of scientific, technical and medical publishing. If people know of research articles on this topic please send them my way. Not research papers either, but a recent explanation on why ESA is sharing Rosette NAVCAM images under cc by sa. http://blogs.esa.int/rosetta/2014/11/04/rosetta-navcam-images-now-available-under-a-creative-commons-licence/ HTH, -- Jean-Frédéric ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising banners (again)
Hi all, This type of fundraising is -- by its very nature -- obtrusive. We are thinking about other options. But, as with anything, every action has equal and opposite reaction. Anything we do, we have to consider the consequences and we will find flaws. Now for the specifics: Yes -- the fundraising team works incredibly hard to optimize and adjust to changes in our environment and to minimize obtrusiveness (there are multiple ways to measure this: total impressions, % conversions, size, parallelizing campaigns, etc.). It is a complex multi-variable equation. Fundraising uses A/B tests to do much of the optimization, but they also use surveys, user tests, and sentiment analysis. Some of what you see is counter-intuitive (even to me, and I have experience with this), but they work. All of this year's tests showed minimal brand impact even from the overlay screen. That said, going forward we are considering an unbiased 3rd party to do some of this analysis. No -- we are not perfect we are constantly working at improving. There are a million opinions on how this should be done, and then there is research and live data. This year we made only minimal changes to the text of the banner. Next year we are going to play with different messaging, and the team will welcome you suggestions. Finally thank you for supporting the team. They are literally locked-up in a room and working around the clock! Lila On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 8:44 AM, pajz pajzm...@gmail.com wrote: On 3 December 2014 at 14:09, Liam Wyatt liamwy...@gmail.com wrote: Dear WMF Fundraising team, please do not take this thread (or this email) as an attack on yourselves or the professionalism that you apply to your work. I would suspect that what drives this is indeed the professionalism of the Fundraising team. I don't mean to be overly speculative, but what we are talking about here is an issue that doesn't readily translate into metrics. Creating and gathering metrics for damage to the Wikipedia brand would be extremely difficult and expensive. On the other hand, creating and gathering metrics for the number/amount/... of donations received is easy and cheap. Relatedly, damage to the Wikipedia brand is not something the impact of which you feel directly, while the number/amount/... of donations received is something that immediately translates into WMF's budget. So I assume the Fundraising team is in a somewhat uncomfortable position here. Getting them to change the way they run the campaigns might, in this case, really not work on its own; rather, in my view, any decision on this likely has to come from the very top of the Foundation (those that Fundraising reports to), who, to some degree, have to place their gut feeling over the implications derived from the available/feasible set of hard quantitative metrics. Cheers, Patrik ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimedia France] WikiCheese crowdfunding - Let's photograph 'em all
110% !!! We bleu our first goal. Pierre-Yves Beaudouin writes: I'm the project leader of WikiCheese. KissKissBankBank Christophe writes: Thanks again, I tried to remain brie-f I had a dream like this last week, full of smoke and gorgons. Kudos à Pyb, Christophe and all: this looks delicious. ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising banners (again)
Lila Tretikov lila@... writes: This type of fundraising is -- by its very nature -- obtrusive. We are thinking about other options. But, as with anything, every action has equal and opposite reaction. Anything we do, we have to consider the consequences and we will find flaws. Now for the specifics: Yes -- the fundraising team works incredibly hard to optimize and adjust to changes in our environment and to minimize obtrusiveness (there are multiple ways to measure this: total impressions, % conversions, size, parallelizing campaigns, etc.). It is a complex multi-variable equation. Fundraising uses A/B tests to do much of the optimization, but they also use surveys, user tests, and sentiment analysis. Some of what you see is counter-intuitive (even to me, and I have experience with this), but they work. All of this year's tests showed minimal brand impact even from the overlay screen. That said, going forward we are considering an unbiased 3rd party to do some of this analysis. I was unaware of these other metrics that fundraising collects. Can you share them with us? It would be really great to get information about the methodology used, the raw or anonymized data, and the curated data/visualizations that's being used to show there's no brand damage. Anecdotal evidence and social media suggests the opposite of what you're saying, so I'm eager to see the evidence that shows nothing's wrong. - Ryan ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] edited mercilessly
Thanks Nemo and James. In case you haven't guessed already, I am wondering whether having this message is a good idea or a bad idea. I don't really know and I can only make some guesses. I knew what a wiki was when I first encountered Wikipedia in 2004. Because of this, the edited mercilessly part made sense to me, but I was still happy to see that message - it helped me know that I indeed understand what wiki means. I presume that a lot of other people didn't know what a wiki is back then, because Wikipedia was the first wiki that became so popular, and that's probably why the message was put there. In 2014, Wikipedia is still more popular than any other wiki, by far. I (further) presume that lot of people today don't know what a wiki actually is, and just think that it's the shorter name of that website that keeps popping up when they google for stuff. If this is true, then when new users try to join, they are likely not to fully understand that their contributions will be edited mercilessly. So what I'm wondering about is: Should that message be put back there to set the right expectations? Should it be put back only on article creation, to make sure that people don't think that they own the articles they are creating? Should it not be put back there because people just need to be smart enough to figure out for themselves that if they can edit an article, everybody else can, too? Should it not be put back there because it would create clutter? Should it not be put back there because the word mercilessly is quite unpleasant? Should any other message be put instead? I honestly don't know; I'm just throwing ideas around, and your input is welcome. As always, I'd be especially happy to hear opinions not just from the English Wikipedia. -- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com “We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore 2014-12-03 19:01 GMT+02:00 James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org: On 3 December 2014 at 05:08, Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote: Hi, I have a vague recollection that when I started editing the English Wikipedia ten years ago, there was a notice near the Save button, which said something like this: Your changes will be edited mercilessly. I remember similar notices in other languages as well, though even more vaguely. I don't see it now. I checked English, Hebrew and Russian. Does anybody know why was it removed? Did the editors communities just decide independently to remove it for whatever reason? If it was, I'd love to see links to discussions if anybody has them. Or was it a design decision by the Foundation? The messages in question are copyrightwarning https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/diffusion/MW/browse/master/languages/i18n/en.json;2e2958d6d9107fcc479183eaf2dc86247f87072e$650 and copyrightwarning2 https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/diffusion/MW/browse/master/languages/i18n/en.json;2e2958d6d9107fcc479183eaf2dc86247f87072e$651 in MediaWiki core, which still use this term. However, as Nemo says, Wikimedia cluster wikis use a different message provided by the WikimediaMessages extension that doesn't currently include the term. I imagine it fell foul of the work to make the language simple and easy to understand when those were written. J. -- James D. Forrester Product Manager, Editing Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. jforres...@wikimedia.org | @jdforrester ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising banners (again)
Hi Lila, Thanks for your response. In the past, fundraising was more of a collaborative effort - maybe it would make sense to rethink the fundraising process after this round, and see how the community can be made co-own the process, so that the work of the team becomes easier, and friction less. I think that would be a way to solve a lot of the hurdles we're encountering right now. Best, Lodewijk On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com wrote: Lila Tretikov lila@... writes: This type of fundraising is -- by its very nature -- obtrusive. We are thinking about other options. But, as with anything, every action has equal and opposite reaction. Anything we do, we have to consider the consequences and we will find flaws. Now for the specifics: Yes -- the fundraising team works incredibly hard to optimize and adjust to changes in our environment and to minimize obtrusiveness (there are multiple ways to measure this: total impressions, % conversions, size, parallelizing campaigns, etc.). It is a complex multi-variable equation. Fundraising uses A/B tests to do much of the optimization, but they also use surveys, user tests, and sentiment analysis. Some of what you see is counter-intuitive (even to me, and I have experience with this), but they work. All of this year's tests showed minimal brand impact even from the overlay screen. That said, going forward we are considering an unbiased 3rd party to do some of this analysis. I was unaware of these other metrics that fundraising collects. Can you share them with us? It would be really great to get information about the methodology used, the raw or anonymized data, and the curated data/visualizations that's being used to show there's no brand damage. Anecdotal evidence and social media suggests the opposite of what you're saying, so I'm eager to see the evidence that shows nothing's wrong. - Ryan ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising banners (again)
It is already co-owned. It is just that people haven't bothered to try talking to the Fundraising Team. Is it time to rename Teams to something else, something that suggests that they don't work in a cave on the Moon? -- svetlana On Thu, 4 Dec 2014, at 08:32, Lodewijk wrote: Hi Lila, Thanks for your response. In the past, fundraising was more of a collaborative effort - maybe it would make sense to rethink the fundraising process after this round, and see how the community can be made co-own the process, so that the work of the team becomes easier, and friction less. I think that would be a way to solve a lot of the hurdles we're encountering right now. Best, Lodewijk On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com wrote: Lila Tretikov lila@... writes: This type of fundraising is -- by its very nature -- obtrusive. We are thinking about other options. But, as with anything, every action has equal and opposite reaction. Anything we do, we have to consider the consequences and we will find flaws. Now for the specifics: Yes -- the fundraising team works incredibly hard to optimize and adjust to changes in our environment and to minimize obtrusiveness (there are multiple ways to measure this: total impressions, % conversions, size, parallelizing campaigns, etc.). It is a complex multi-variable equation. Fundraising uses A/B tests to do much of the optimization, but they also use surveys, user tests, and sentiment analysis. Some of what you see is counter-intuitive (even to me, and I have experience with this), but they work. All of this year's tests showed minimal brand impact even from the overlay screen. That said, going forward we are considering an unbiased 3rd party to do some of this analysis. I was unaware of these other metrics that fundraising collects. Can you share them with us? It would be really great to get information about the methodology used, the raw or anonymized data, and the curated data/visualizations that's being used to show there's no brand damage. Anecdotal evidence and social media suggests the opposite of what you're saying, so I'm eager to see the evidence that shows nothing's wrong. - Ryan ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising banners (again)
I would like to expose this more, maybe after this crunch. Just keep in mind that it takes time to anonymize and process -- a time that is otherwise spent on optimizing or collaborating. One bucket of resources, many demands... and I'd like to keep us as lean as we are :) Below is a soundbite I got from many notes I get from our donors, this is not unusual about this banner: *...banner on wikipedia today motivated me to donate for the first time. I think the increased size properly conveyed the importance of the donations to running the site. Previous banners were a bit too polite or subtle to get me thinking.* On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com wrote: Lila Tretikov lila@... writes: This type of fundraising is -- by its very nature -- obtrusive. We are thinking about other options. But, as with anything, every action has equal and opposite reaction. Anything we do, we have to consider the consequences and we will find flaws. Now for the specifics: Yes -- the fundraising team works incredibly hard to optimize and adjust to changes in our environment and to minimize obtrusiveness (there are multiple ways to measure this: total impressions, % conversions, size, parallelizing campaigns, etc.). It is a complex multi-variable equation. Fundraising uses A/B tests to do much of the optimization, but they also use surveys, user tests, and sentiment analysis. Some of what you see is counter-intuitive (even to me, and I have experience with this), but they work. All of this year's tests showed minimal brand impact even from the overlay screen. That said, going forward we are considering an unbiased 3rd party to do some of this analysis. I was unaware of these other metrics that fundraising collects. Can you share them with us? It would be really great to get information about the methodology used, the raw or anonymized data, and the curated data/visualizations that's being used to show there's no brand damage. Anecdotal evidence and social media suggests the opposite of what you're saying, so I'm eager to see the evidence that shows nothing's wrong. - Ryan ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimedia Deutschland: New board elected, annual plan postponed.
Congratulations, new board! On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 5:04 AM, Nurunnaby Hasive n...@nhasive.com wrote: Congratulations WMDE new board! On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Asaf Bartov abar...@wikimedia.org wrote: Congratulations to WMDE -- *Nurunnaby Chowdhury Hasive* Administrator | Bengali Wikipedia http://bn.wikipedia.org/wiki/user:nhasive Member | IEG Committee, Wikimedia Foundation https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/People Moderator, Social Media Interaction | The Daily Prothom-Alo http://www.prothom-alo.com Bangladesh Ambassador | Open Knowledge http://www.okfn.org Treasurer | Bangladesh Open Source Network (BdOSN) http://www.bdosn.org Task Force Member | Mozilla Bangladesh http://www.mozillabd.org Author Translator | Global Voice http://bn.globalvoicesonline.org/author/hasive fb.com/nhasive | @nhasive http://www.twitter.com/nhasive | Skype: nhasive | www.nhasive.com ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising banners (again)
I have no doubt that the banners work. But in the opinion of a number of commentators here, the banners currently feature a very alarming wording – making it sound as though there is not enough money to keep Wikipedia online for another year without introducing advertising – and yet we know that the Foundation has just reported having its healthiest bank balance ever[1]. The person you quote had no way of knowing that, because the banner doesn't tell people. It doesn't seem fair. [1] https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/foundation/e/e3/FINAL_13_14From_KPMG.pdf#page=4 On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Lila Tretikov l...@wikimedia.org wrote: I would like to expose this more, maybe after this crunch. Just keep in mind that it takes time to anonymize and process -- a time that is otherwise spent on optimizing or collaborating. One bucket of resources, many demands... and I'd like to keep us as lean as we are :) Below is a soundbite I got from many notes I get from our donors, this is not unusual about this banner: *...banner on wikipedia today motivated me to donate for the first time. I think the increased size properly conveyed the importance of the donations to running the site. Previous banners were a bit too polite or subtle to get me thinking.* On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com wrote: Lila Tretikov lila@... writes: This type of fundraising is -- by its very nature -- obtrusive. We are thinking about other options. But, as with anything, every action has equal and opposite reaction. Anything we do, we have to consider the consequences and we will find flaws. Now for the specifics: Yes -- the fundraising team works incredibly hard to optimize and adjust to changes in our environment and to minimize obtrusiveness (there are multiple ways to measure this: total impressions, % conversions, size, parallelizing campaigns, etc.). It is a complex multi-variable equation. Fundraising uses A/B tests to do much of the optimization, but they also use surveys, user tests, and sentiment analysis. Some of what you see is counter-intuitive (even to me, and I have experience with this), but they work. All of this year's tests showed minimal brand impact even from the overlay screen. That said, going forward we are considering an unbiased 3rd party to do some of this analysis. I was unaware of these other metrics that fundraising collects. Can you share them with us? It would be really great to get information about the methodology used, the raw or anonymized data, and the curated data/visualizations that's being used to show there's no brand damage. Anecdotal evidence and social media suggests the opposite of what you're saying, so I'm eager to see the evidence that shows nothing's wrong. - Ryan ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising banners (again)
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 5:42 AM, Lila Tretikov l...@wikimedia.org wrote: I would like to expose this more, maybe after this crunch. Just keep in mind that it takes time to anonymize and process -- a time that is otherwise spent on optimizing or collaborating. One bucket of resources, many demands... and I'd like to keep us as lean as we are :) Below is a soundbite I got from many notes I get from our donors, this is not unusual about this banner: *...banner on wikipedia today motivated me to donate for the first time. I think the increased size properly conveyed the importance of the donations to running the site. Previous banners were a bit too polite or subtle to get me thinking.* Lila, the concern is not that the fundraiser is working, which your soundbite confirms, but that it is deceiving people, or at least manipulating them 'too much' to be consistent with our values. One way to test that would be to organise a survey for donors, informing them of the current financials, the current strategy document and current status on achieving that strategy, a breakdown on where the money is currently going and ask them whether they are happy with the amount and tone of the information they were given before being asked to donote. WMF donors may already being surveyed like this (ideally done by academics in the discipline rather than WMF staff/contractors); if so, hopefully that data can be shared. In addition to the concern about the tone of the fundraiser damaging the brand, there is a strong correlation between increased WMF revenue (and the growth of chapters) and the loss of edit contributors. Has research been done to rule out causation? i.e. specifically asking previously highly productive volunteers who have stopped contributing whether they feel the increase in funds has not resulted in their work being adequately supported? -- John Vandenberg ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising banners (again)
John Mark Vandenberg wrote: i.e. specifically asking previously highly productive volunteers who have stopped contributing whether they feel the increase in funds has not resulted in their work being adequately supported? Thanks for your great wording, John. I belong to this category (somewhat). I stopped contributing because I felt that my work is not adequately supported. I felt the need to develop some software. I have rather limited free time however, and I've been in the not highly productive on-wiki phase for over 3 years now. Incidentally, one of the entities that doesn't adequately support my work is my local chapter. It had been extremely hostile toward Wikimedia movement and after learning how it works I had no motivation to continue working with Wikimedia projects. How poorly the Wikimedia Foundation itself works wasn't the biggest obstacle (I found it mildly approachable and was (and am!) a tiny bit happy with it). -- svetlana ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising banners (again)
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 7:46 AM, svetlana svetl...@fastmail.com.au wrote: John Mark Vandenberg wrote: i.e. specifically asking previously highly productive volunteers who have stopped contributing whether they feel the increase in funds has not resulted in their work being adequately supported? Thanks for your great wording, John. I belong to this category (somewhat). I stopped contributing because I felt that my work is not adequately supported. I felt the need to develop some software. I have rather limited free time however, and I've been in the not highly productive on-wiki phase for over 3 years now. Incidentally, one of the entities that doesn't adequately support my work is my local chapter. It had been extremely hostile toward Wikimedia movement and after learning how it works I had no motivation to continue working with Wikimedia projects. How poorly the Wikimedia Foundation itself works wasn't the biggest obstacle (I found it mildly approachable and was (and am!) a tiny bit happy with it). Have you looked into the funding situation of your local chapter? Does it have large cash reserves and large predicable revenue flows? -- John Vandenberg ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising banners (again)
Hi, On Thu, 4 Dec 2014, at 12:30, John Mark Vandenberg wrote: On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 7:46 AM, svetlana svetl...@fastmail.com.au wrote: John Mark Vandenberg wrote: i.e. specifically asking previously highly productive volunteers who have stopped contributing whether they feel the increase in funds has not resulted in their work being adequately supported? Thanks for your great wording, John. I belong to this category (somewhat). I stopped contributing because I felt that my work is not adequately supported. I felt the need to develop some software. I have rather limited free time however, and I've been in the not highly productive on-wiki phase for over 3 years now. Incidentally, one of the entities that doesn't adequately support my work is my local chapter. It had been extremely hostile toward Wikimedia movement and after learning how it works I had no motivation to continue working with Wikimedia projects. How poorly the Wikimedia Foundation itself works wasn't the biggest obstacle (I found it mildly approachable and was (and am!) a tiny bit happy with it). Have you looked into the funding situation of your local chapter? Does it have large cash reserves and large predicable revenue flows? -- John Vandenberg Thanks for the suggestion, but there is not a problem with how it is funded. It organizes events which miss the point. I would be happy to be more specific, but I will do so at a later point, not here and not now; what I was saying was only that *if* we were to do such survey, we would need to *also* ask people how happy they are with their Chapters activities and adequate support from them. The funding banner is for them all, not just WMF, after all. -- svetlana ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising banners (again)
Lila Tretikov lila@... writes: I would like to expose this more, maybe after this crunch. Just keep in mind that it takes time to anonymize and process -- a time that is otherwise spent on optimizing or collaborating. One bucket of resources, many demands... and I'd like to keep us as lean as we are :) You have a community that's upset because they believe the fundraising banners are causing long-lasting harm to Wikimedia's brand. The analytics team can probably spend a few hours handling this. They aren't allocated to the fundraiser. If it's so labor intensive to go through this data, then it's likely not being actively used to make decisions. At minimum the methodology that's being used can be shared. Below is a soundbite I got from many notes I get from our donors, this is not unusual about this banner: *...banner on wikipedia today motivated me to donate for the first time. I think the increased size properly conveyed the importance of the donations to running the site. Previous banners were a bit too polite or subtle to get me thinking.* Here's the results of a quick twitter search: Every year, the Wikipedia begging banners get bigger and bigger, now it's 3/4 of the screen Wikipedia's donation banners are so huge now that they actually startle me when they load. .@Wikipedia might as well use their obtrusive donation banners as ad space. Or whenever they are running low on funds, enable ads. every time wikipedia asks for money the banners get bigger and bigger Holy shit, @wikipedia, just have done with it and put ads up—these donation banners are awful. remember when wikipedia donation banners used to take up only 5% of the page I WOULD donate to @Wikipedia but their donation banners are just too damn small. I can never spot the darn things! I hate to say this but @Wikipedia's Donate ! banners are very annoying. Especially when you've already donated don't like to feel forced fuck your giant ass banner ads, @wikipedia. i want my previous donations back. @sillyredfox Those ads are overly obtrusive. Never giving to @Wikipedia until they're toned down. I'd rather let Wikipedia mine bitcoin on my machine than be assaulted with their these aren't ads fundraiser ads. @codinghorror Considering Wikipedia have 90 mil in cash in the bank, the ads have an oddly desperate tone. Dear Wikipedia users: To protect our independence, we'll never run ads...except the huge one begging for cash you'll see on EVERY PAGE. There's so, so many more and I only included results that were relevant to the size or copy. There's a theme of this search, too. There's not a single positive thing being said about them. I used to see people joking about the Jimmy banners, encouraging people to donate. The only jokes I see now are at Wikipedia's expense. - Ryan ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising banners (again)
Hi all. I can see clear interest in everyone on this thread wanting to figure out the right way to do it. Let's not jinx it by painting WMF Fundraising as the guys who break and community as the gwho rage. Both these groups are rather capable of working things out (unlike the ...who break and ...who rage terms indicate). Ryan Lane wrote: You have a community that's upset [...] Don't even say more. We are the supporters of the Wikimedia movement. That includes Lila, that includes the fundraising folks, that includes you and me and many other people. I don't see a reason to isolate any of these people and blame. I, for one, appreciate Lila for catalyzing this thread into communication with Fundraising Team. Such communication was clearly lacking (and when it is, it's usually both sides of the conversation at fault for accumulating their rage instead of communicating it early). -- svetlana ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising banners (again)
I wrote: it's usually both sides of the conversation at fault for accumulating their rage instead of communicating it early I unintentionally skipped a couple words. I meant to say: it's usually both sides of the conversation at fault, *such* *as* for accumulating their rage instead of communicating it early -- svetlana On Thu, 4 Dec 2014, at 14:47, svetlana wrote: Hi all. I can see clear interest in everyone on this thread wanting to figure out the right way to do it. Let's not jinx it by painting WMF Fundraising as the guys who break and community as the gwho rage. Both these groups are rather capable of working things out (unlike the ...who break and ...who rage terms indicate). Ryan Lane wrote: You have a community that's upset [...] Don't even say more. We are the supporters of the Wikimedia movement. That includes Lila, that includes the fundraising folks, that includes you and me and many other people. I don't see a reason to isolate any of these people and blame. I, for one, appreciate Lila for catalyzing this thread into communication with Fundraising Team. Such communication was clearly lacking (and when it is, it's usually both sides of the conversation at fault for accumulating their rage instead of communicating it early). -- svetlana ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising banners (again)
svetlana svetlana@... writes: I wrote: it's usually both sides of the conversation at fault for accumulating their rage instead of communicating it early I unintentionally skipped a couple words. I meant to say: it's usually both sides of the conversation at fault, *such* *as* for accumulating their rage instead of communicating it early I worked for Wikimedia Foundation for a little over four years. Every year I (and many other staff members) have expressed worry about the size and message of the banners. There's been plenty of early communication. Every year we get promises that they'll work on making the banners better. However, it seems when they say better, they mean more effective from the perspective of generating revenue. The message from the fundraising staff and Lila is more of the same. This year I've started having people I know worry that Wikipedia is in financial trouble. It makes me feel ashamed when I have to tell them Wikipedia is in fact fine, but that the foundation uses this messaging to more effectively drive donations. It makes them angry to hear it. I'm not trying to paint this as us vs them. I'm trying to express that planting heads firmly in the sand is not an effective approach to dealing with the brand damage that's readily apparent on social media. - Ryan ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] edited mercilessly
Lane Rasberry wrote: This text has been a part of the five pillars for a long time. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Five_pillars Nice find. For the curious, the phrase was added to the Five pillars page in May 2005, seemingly copied from the user interface: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=14525251oldid=14496130. The phrase was introduced to the user interface of the (later to be known as MediaWiki) software in July 2002, it seems: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/618. MZMcBride ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising banners (again)
Ryan Lane, The whole of your post suggests that the fundraising folks are deaf. Your last sentence doesn't make you more to the point. This makes you really unapproachable and puts the fundraising folks into harder position as they have to cry, beg pardon and spend time apologizing -- as if they had killed a kitten -- before they can approach you and ask for help. On one side, such hostile approach is something you might feel these folks deserve for their awful mistakes. You might feel that you're being more clear about it - but clarity doesn't really have to come at the cost of shaming and not having made a single move toward changing the situation. We are all learning. We should work out measurable, actionable steps toward solving the problem. Such steps should look pleasant, nice, encouraging, motivating, and informative. When looking at them, everyone reading the thread should smile and feel that they should've come up with these steps long ago (including all of the WMF staff and the fundraising folks), and feel motivated to expand them. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fundraising_principles was mentioned in this thread earlier as a collaboration space. It is probably a good one (although it lacks geometry specs or any kind of time or statistics suggestions or past analysis results). That's a wiki. It is just waiting for you to touch it and put it in better shape. -- svetlana On Thu, 4 Dec 2014, at 15:34, Ryan Lane wrote: svetlana svetlana@... writes: I wrote: it's usually both sides of the conversation at fault for accumulating their rage instead of communicating it early I unintentionally skipped a couple words. I meant to say: it's usually both sides of the conversation at fault, *such* *as* for accumulating their rage instead of communicating it early I worked for Wikimedia Foundation for a little over four years. Every year I (and many other staff members) have expressed worry about the size and message of the banners. There's been plenty of early communication. Every year we get promises that they'll work on making the banners better. However, it seems when they say better, they mean more effective from the perspective of generating revenue. The message from the fundraising staff and Lila is more of the same. This year I've started having people I know worry that Wikipedia is in financial trouble. It makes me feel ashamed when I have to tell them Wikipedia is in fact fine, but that the foundation uses this messaging to more effectively drive donations. It makes them angry to hear it. I'm not trying to paint this as us vs them. I'm trying to express that planting heads firmly in the sand is not an effective approach to dealing with the brand damage that's readily apparent on social media. - Ryan ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe