Re: [Wikimedia-l] Annoying ads

2020-12-05 Thread Gnangarra
Kaya Aron The software engineers are decent and many of them also have a Wikimedia contribution background giving them the knowledge to benefit all the projects, they are also spread across the globe making sure there is someone available at all times to keep on top of any system issue should

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Annoying ads

2020-12-05 Thread
Let's try kicking this perennial thead again. This morning (5 Dec 2020) I paused cooling my porridge when looking up how Wikipedia describes 'Latinx' usage on my cellular, I was faced with a *2 page* advert. * The advert meant nothing of the article could be seen, not even the title, without

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Annoying ads

2020-12-05 Thread Joseph Seddon
Hey all, To avoid burying the lead, the feedback is appreciated and we do listen whenever feedback is raised. I've just been coordinating with the team, and we've rolled back this change. For some background, the emojis in this messaging were a recent addition earlier this week. Emojis have

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Annoying ads

2020-12-05 Thread Joseph Seddon
Hey Michel, There are some other points that Fae raised particularly around user experience and technical implementation that are distinctly more complex tasks and we are going to need to discuss and plan our testing to work on them, and the team is at very limited capacity on a Saturday. (I

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Annoying ads

2020-12-05 Thread Chris Gates via Wikimedia-l
I opened a browser I’m not logged in on to see what these ads were. Here is the text, unedited, of the second ad I was shown (after closing the first): “Hi reader . Sorry for the interruption, but this Saturday Wikipedia really needs your help. This is the 3rd appeal we've shown you. 98% of our

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Annoying ads

2020-12-05 Thread Gnangarra
tend to agree there should be a mobile friendly version, the article should be visible at the same time. What wording is used it definitely should not have religious actions or symbology in it... the other emojis do seem childish On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 at 21:58, Chris Gates via Wikimedia-l <

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Annoying ads

2020-12-05 Thread Subhashish
Apart from the usual suspects [ a. I think whether a certain emoji is religious is not a grave problem; b. civil society orgs survive on donations and fundraising is important; c. as a movement we can't probably ever have everyone agreeing on everything but pushing fundraising messages that brings

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Annoying ads

2020-12-05 Thread Michel Vuijlsteke
I don't quite think the emoji were the only thing people hated about this. On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 at 17:09, Joseph Seddon wrote: > Hey all, > > To avoid burying the lead, the feedback is appreciated and we do listen > whenever feedback is raised. I've just been coordinating with the team, and >

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Annoying ads

2020-12-05 Thread Demian
Hey Seddon, Thank you for reading and considering the feedback provided. I'd like to add one more perspective to the picture: IIRC in recent years the amount of donations was constantly increasing year-by-year and it's now far more than what's necessary to cover operational expenses of the WMF.

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Annoying ads [and a Privacy Policy question]

2020-12-05 Thread Yury Bulka
Dear all, In the context of this discussion, I think it might be appropriate to share the following. A few days ago I had a brief conversation with a (non-Wikipedian) user on social media regarding a fundraising banner they were seeing. In their case they had an additional concern with the

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Annoying ads

2020-12-05 Thread Chris Gates via Wikimedia-l
Hi Seddon, Thanks for removing the emojis; without them, the banner is infinitely more professional. Regards, Vermont On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 11:09 Joseph Seddon wrote: > Hey all, > > To avoid burying the lead, the feedback is appreciated and we do listen > whenever feedback is raised. I've