Great to know. Thanks for sharing!
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:46 PM, svetlana wrote:
>
> Megan Hernandez wrote:
> > [...] And
> > thank you for making Wikipedia a treasured resource that people are happy
> > to support :)
> >
> > Quotes from Wikipedia readers:
> > [...]
>
> We should do this on a
Megan Hernandez wrote:
> [...] And
> thank you for making Wikipedia a treasured resource that people are happy
> to support :)
>
> Quotes from Wikipedia readers:
> [...]
We should do this on all sister projects, ideally. They gotta know the role of
WMF in the movement (and a fundraising banner i
Thank you for sharing!
Emily Blanchard
Talent Acquisition Team
Wikimedia Foundation
eblanchard@wikimedia. org
Follow us on Twitter @wikimediaatwork
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Home
Become a Contributor: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Teahouse
Join Us: http://wikimediafoundatio
What a wonderful news, Megan!
We will sharing with our social media channels this inspiring quotes.
2014-12-15 18:25 GMT-06:00 Megan Hernandez :
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> We are two weeks into the English fundraising campaign. We've had
> incredible support from our community of readers these past two
Hi everyone,
We are two weeks into the English fundraising campaign. We've had
incredible support from our community of readers these past two weeks and
we are thankful to everyone who has contributed so far.
We have raised roughly $18 million from 1.6 million readers since we
launched the campa
Dear all,
Jean-Frédéric and I just published the learning patterns about this WMFr Board
Handbook.
Please find it here:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Learning_patterns/Board_Handbook_%E2%88%92_A_shared_vision_of_the_board_role_in_an_evolving_organisation
Hope it can be useful, if you
Greetings, Wikimedia colleagues:
Many thanks to all who have participated in the organizational
effectiveness tool so far. The questionnaire is still active and *the date
for responding has been extended to 29 December:*
*Link to take questionnaire (can be used once per IP address, but more
links
Hi
As an uploader of a deleted IAC logo to Commons for this organisation IAC for
the en.wp article, and after carefully reviewing the continuous edit wars /
blocks over the article, what emerges is nobody has appreciated that
Bruentrup's client's organisation's name is "India Against Corruption
Strainu, 15/12/2014 13:06:
Online editing for images is an obvious first step, but we know there
are already basic online video editing functions (youtube) so even if
it takes a while, this should be a target for the engineering team.
Does anyone know if there are any bugs on the subject?
Seve
geni, 15/12/2014 09:54:
Not in the way that I mean. WMUK is a contact for wikipedia (and other
wikimedia projects). I've seen little evidence of it being a contact for
people less sure about where they want to go.
Sounds like a problem specific to WMUK then, which you should discuss
with them.
2014-12-15 11:40 GMT+02:00 Yaroslav M. Blanter :
> On 2014-12-15 10:30, svetlana wrote:
>>
>> In addition to the fact that the search sucks, and other issues
>> mentioned here earlier, there are some issues with Commons.
>>
>> 1) Unlike Imgur, it doesn't have a big -- and useable -- "upload"
>> but
On 2014-12-15 10:30, svetlana wrote:
In addition to the fact that the search sucks, and other issues
mentioned here earlier, there are some issues with Commons.
1) Unlike Imgur, it doesn't have a big -- and useable -- "upload"
button on the homepage. I know about media freedom, yet for sharing o
In addition to the fact that the search sucks, and other issues mentioned here
earlier, there are some issues with Commons.
1) Unlike Imgur, it doesn't have a big -- and useable -- "upload" button on the
homepage. I know about media freedom, yet for sharing of photos I made, Commons
is not the
On 14 December 2014 at 18:27, MZMcBride wrote:
>
> My reading is that your replies have a very defeatist outlook. And it
> feels a bit like simple laziness ("everybody does this and we can't make
> messages less awful because it's just too had"). There are a few clear
> problem here and they'r
On 14 December 2014 at 12:09, Federico Leva (Nemo)
wrote:
>
> geni, 14/12/2014 09:13:
>
>> if we can turn the
>> chapters into respected points of contact which GLAMs
>>
>
> Is there any evidence to think they aren't?
>
Not in the way that I mean. WMUK is a contact for wikipedia (and other
wikim
15 matches
Mail list logo
