An utterly shameful decision. I guess Israeli and Jewish lives aren't worth
standing up for, according to Arabic Wikipedia.
Dan Rosenthal
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 8:18 PM Farah Jack Mustaklem
wrote:
> Greetings to all,
>
> Arabic Wikipedia editors have agreed to hold a da
Man, that essay reads like someone spent a grand total of 5 days reading
Wikipedia policies, ventured into some politically fraught articles with a
right-wing agenda, got taken to AN/I for it, and subsequently blocked or
banned.
Dan
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 6:41 AM Vi to wrote:
> I don't know w
Congratulations and welcome Maryana.
Dan Rosenthal
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 11:53 AM Nataliia Tymkiv
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am pleased to announce that the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees
> has appointed Maryana Iskander as the new CEO of the Wikimedia Foundation
> [1]
others already stated, the matter here is not
> if they can, but if they should be engaging on those schemes, as they are
> now.
>
> Best,
> Paulo
>
>
>
> A sábado, 15 de jun de 2019, 18:39, Dan Rosenthal
> escreveu:
>
> > There is no "very basic principl
et's drop the absurd
hyperbole that this is somehow a human rights violation.
Dan Rosenthal
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 11:35 AM Paulo Santos Perneta <
paulospern...@gmail.com> wrote:
> People shouldn't be going with any random option, but rather presume the
> innocence of o
preferred action.
- Abruptly undoing administrator actions without consultation.
- *Reversal of a Wikimedia Foundation office action
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Office_actions>.*
Dan Rosenthal
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 5:06 PM effe iets anders
wrote:
> Great, now we have
I think the broader point being that for any legal or criminal complaints,
the appropriate venue is the court system, not the Wikimedia-L mailing
list.
Dan Rosenthal
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:45 AM, James Salsman wrote:
> > Legal threats are surely the universal language of bad faith
&g
hat wasn't what Robert said, nor was there "bullying and harassment"
coming from anyone other than you, Rogol. This kind of passive-aggressive
straw-manning is an example of precisely why you have worn out your welcome
here.
-Dan
Dan Rosenthal
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 10:26 AM,
tattle to someone's manager, because they
disagreed with you about the wording of your posts in public, is either
constructive or the "sort of behavior" one would "expect you to exhibit in
a public forum." But then again, I'd venture to guess you knew that already.
Che
Michelle is beyond amazing, end of story. Best of luck to the new incoming
GC, and hope she can fill the very big shoes.
-Dan
Dan Rosenthal
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Philippe Beaudette
wrote:
> For nearly a decade, I worked (sometimes closely, sometimes not as closely)
> with Mi
is a good idea in the first place, separate
question.
Dan Rosenthal
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Nathan wrote:
> It's an unambiguously political statement. Not political in the sense of
> "everything we do is political" - but in the sense of opposing the policies
>
"What's a cool thing you just discovered or are involved in that is
happening in the Wikimedia world?"
That the WMF is one of the charities in this week's Humble Bundle (along
with MSF and charity:water) -- and it's actually a pretty good bundle.
https://www.humblebundl
advantage of
his post to GerardM as being tangentially related.)
Dan
Dan Rosenthal
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Thomas Morton <
morton.tho...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> At a guess; unpleasant snark.
>
> Tom
> On 21 Jun 2014 16:49, "Tomasz W. Kozłowski" wrote:
>
&
Echoing Luis's shout-out to Michelle for such a colossal achievement.
Dan Rosenthal
"P.S. Let me take this opportunity to again thank Michelle Paulson for her
work leading this process; all told, it has been something like 18 months
of work for her. And that is only the start for
er chassis?"*
What makes you think they don't?
Dan Rosenthal
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:55 PM, James Salsman wrote:
> When this came up last time, it turned out that there was some kind of
> a deal in place, and certainly many if not most published pictures of
> the Wikimedi
An additional issue, if we're still talking CFAA's private right of action,
is where would the minimum damage requirements come from?
-Dan
Dan Rosenthal
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Nathan wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo)
> wrote:
>
Congratulations about the new site Zack, and congratulations to Megan,
Lisa, and Sara!
Dan Rosenthal
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 9:38 PM, James Salsman wrote:
> I know I've been critical of Zack Exley for technical reasons over the
> past year, but I think very highly of him as a perso
labeled "Cloak of invisibility?" Or the picture of Rory as "mascot"?
> >
> > Further, what does "all but neutral" mean?
> >
> > Really, aren't there better things to do than play morality police
> because
> > someone "might&quo
t; mean?
Really, aren't there better things to do than play morality police because
someone "might" be upset about some ink? This isn't the 1950's. Who is
upset, and why?
-Dan
Dan Rosenthal
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 3:16 AM, Eddy Paine wrote:
> Hi,
> While its m
Anthony and John beat me to it -- I was going to second the suggestion that
the sentence spend a bit of time being wordcrafted on Meta for extra eyes,
to clarify things like the National Security Letters, NSL gag orders, etc.
-Dan
Dan Rosenthal
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 4:02 AM, Anthony wrote
Felicitaciones!
-Dan
Dan Rosenthal
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Victor Grigas wrote:
> Great job on the video And congratulations for 1m articles!
>
> On May 27, 2013, at 9:50 PM, Ivan Martínez wrote:
>
> > In Puebla city, too :D
> >
> >
&
Congratulations Richard (for taking up the task) and also thank you to Alex
for your work on the list as well.
Best,
Dan
Dan Rosenthal
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:10 PM, J Alexandr Ledbury-Romanov <
alexandrdmitriroma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please join me in welcoming our new Wikimed
Huh, I did not know that (I use Reddit maybe once a year at best). Perhaps
that wouldn't be a bad thing though, if that means you are speaking
directly to a relevant audience (men in an all male environment, about
gender gaps).
Dan Rosenthal
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Federico Leva
r audience.
-Dan
Dan Rosenthal
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Samuel Klein wrote:
> This was a wonderful idea. Thank you both for organizing it. SJ
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Theo10011 wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > A few weeks ago MZMcBride proposed
and several interested
parties "clearing" the copy, it completely loses any benefit of the process
and becomes no different to me than a Sharepoint site with slightly better
UI.
-Dan
Dan Rosenthal
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Florence Devouard wrote:
> Just yesterday during a meet
appy to wait for Matthew
> to reply to this question.
>
>
> --
> Thehelpfulone
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Thehelpfulone
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https
Christophe,
About this "reconnaissance d'utilite publique" or "supercharity" concept;
is there a link to an analysis (preferable) or even just the text of the
law/provision/regulation? Even one in French only would be OK, I'm just
curious to know more about how it
Global renames will be done by Stewards then, yes?
-Dan
Dan Rosenthal
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:17 PM, K. Peachey wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Benjamin Chen
> wrote:
> > ...
> > One thing to note is the technical limitation on # of edits. If account
> h
law making it easier for law enforcement to wiretap
certain digital communications; I believe the latest provisions under
discussion involve VoIP. EFF discusses here:
https://www.eff.org/issues/calea
Hope that helps,
-Dan
Dan Rosenthal
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Mathieu Stumpf
ty oversight of the WMF's implementation of the movement's vision,
this is a good thing. But if not, it risks the organization slowly drifting
into something different, without the leverage of the fundraiser to bring
it back.
Dan Rosenthal
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 4:52 PM, David Gerard wrote
virtue of
being staffed by people who understand technology, who understand the
digital space in which the WMF operates, and who can at least keep up with
change and innovation?
Dan Rosenthal
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo)
wrote:
> Dariusz Jemielniak, 18/03/2013 10
plemented one on their own,
it'd need support from all sorts of other entities (WMF legal, probably
WCA, etc.).
-Dan
Dan Rosenthal
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Ting Chen wrote:
> Hello dear all,
>
> at first thank you very much MZ for put this together. This is a quite ho
I can't find a copy of mine (probably in storage somewhere) but I would
assume mine was identical to Keegan's since we came in at the same time and
did the same job.
-Dan
Dan Rosenthal
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Keegan Peterzell wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Kati
ddenly a concern
now, and not before, especially given the quality of success they've had in
the past.
-Dan
Dan Rosenthal
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 4:21 PM, rupert THURNER wrote:
> my first thought when i read this was "should i use my free time to
> edit wikipedia so that somebod
Not really excessive during a holiday season where people may not see the
message for several days. And a month is a good amount of lead time for
something like this. I don't get what the problem is...
Dan Rosenthal
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Hi Jayle,
&g
What would be nice to have would be a not-overly-detailed summary of how
payment processing/fundraising was done 5 years ago, and how it is being
done this year (and in the future) with new payment processing, FDC, etc.
Because frankly, I don't have a clue anymore.
Dan Rosenthal
On Mon, N
Agree with Keegan.Not to mention a) the legal ramifications, and b) the PR
ramifications -- how on earth do we maintain a straight face having a
policy on paid editing if we begin paying administrators directly?
Dan Rosenthal
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Samuel Klein wrote:
> On Oct
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Yaroslav M. Blanter wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 19:19:59 +0300, Dan Rosenthal wrote:
>
>> I too have to say that while I agree with a narrowing focus, I disagree
>> with the tabling of Fellowships. Not only have they brought a lot of great
e Visual Editor (which is awesome), but also creating a
conducive environment for new editors from a policy standpoint. I'm afraid
we're going to lose that in a narrowing focus.
Dan Rosenthal
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimed
ere's no way to
know whether there is a standing assignment agreement or not.
Additionally to confuse things, HIPAA mandates access to (but not
necessarily copyright in, though I haven't really looked at it) medical
records, as well as disclosure and protection requirements.
Dan Rosentha
I've asked on my state bar's listserv to see if anyone has any thoughts or
has any caselaw available they can refer to. I have some speculation, but
I'm running out the door so I'll post it when I return.
Dan Rosenthal
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:21 PM, James Heilman wro
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
> Dan Rosenthal, 16/07/2012 20:01:
>
> It's like you read the first 14 words, ignored everything else, and
>> twisted
>> it around until it doesn't even resemble what he actually said
>>
>
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
> Bishakha Datta, 16/07/2012 18:53:
>
> At our in-person board meeting of 11 July 2012, the vote on this was
>> provisionally recorded at 9-1, with Jimmy voting against. Jimmy has since
>> changed his vote to a yes, on reviewing an FAQ
The way I read it, Steven correct me if I am wrong, he is writing in a
staff role, but not necessarily within his Engineering responsibilities.
Dan Rosenthal
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Theo10011 wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:04 AM, Steven Walling >wrote:
>
> > P.S
, the
Brazilian Ambassador's residence, not a particularly well known landmark,
is known.
Dan Rosenthal
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Cristian Consonni
wrote:
> 2012/6/7 Richard Symonds :
> > the house because it's not
> > on their navigation systems...
>
> May I than
45 matches
Mail list logo
