Dear Alan, I am far more surprised that you appear to be disparaging
Andreas Kolbe's very constructive questions and contributions.
You yourself seem to contribute nothing to the facts of the case, but
others who contribute very appropriately you would like to see blocked.
What kind of attitude
Am 16.06.2013 15:24, schrieb Johan Jönsson:
I would say our experience is that it doesn't affect the number of human
editors at all in any way.
Hi Johan, Anders Wennersten says:
And as shown earlier we have learned that this actually helps recruting
and keeping editors
???
It is difficu
viding free knowledge for all.
And as shown earlier we have learned that this actually helps recruting
and keeping editors
Anders
Hubertl skrev 2013-06-17 12:09:
Payin´ peanuts, gettin´ monkeys
Servin´ facts, gettin´ idiots.
An unmanageable, not maintainable mass of articles is the best way to
. If you tell me that you desire a fig, I answer you that there must
be time. Let it first blossom, then bear fruit, then ripen.
h.
Am 17.06.2013 22:27, schrieb Asaf Bartov:
Hubertl, your e-mail was rude, even if you did not mean it to be. Please
remember hundreds of people read every e-mail
about
knowledge, understanding and correlations.
Why do not you need people like me? If we have bots now?
Do we want to make ourselves more important with impressive numbers?
Hubertl!
The german language Wikipedia has no single article that was generated
by a bot. I'm proud of it. If this
