any smaller alt-coins,
unless an effective countermeasure can be developed.
-Robert Rohde
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 8:23 AM James Salsman wrote:
> Geni, it's the "Day of the Dead" now so I want to attempt to resurrect
> this thread.
>
> Is FoldingCoin still vulnerable
Hi Renee,
Not a real answer, but you might consider looking for different
terminology. Using "duty of care" the way you do is more common in British
English. On the American side of the pond, it is less common to talk about
a "duty of care" and more common to talk about specific issues, like hea
L8 v6d44oh
On Jul 23, 2016 2:54 AM, "Stephen LaPorte" wrote:
Hi all,
The Board of Trustees have published minutes from the summer Board meeting
on June 22-23 and the Board meeting on June 29 to discuss the endowment.
You can find the meeting minutes and accompanying documents on the
Foundatio
imarily to a lack of scrutiny then that suggests the process of vetting
Board candidates is in serious need of improvement.
-Robert Rohde
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 6:43 PM, Matthew Flaschen <
matthew.flasc...@gatech.edu> wrote:
> On 01/08/2016 12:43 PM, Dariusz Jemielniak wrote:
>
>>
Would you (or James) care to clarify?
-Robert Rohde
On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Lodewijk
wrote:
> Dear Dariusz,
>
> Thank you for the response. I understand that you (and the board) want to
> move on. But there are in many organisations (and countries) certain powers
> that are &#
int announcement but neglected to
discuss that with James before ejecting him from the meeting, then that
suggests poor handling by the Board.
-Robert Rohde
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 9:25 PM, olatunde isaac
wrote:
> I'm very disappointed to know that the board meeting was still ongoing as
Jimbo, on his talk page, says this was a removal "for cause", and that he
expects the whole Board will provide a further statement.
-Robert Rohde
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 12:03 AM, Kevin Gorman wrote:
> As far as I can tell, no one alleges Doc James did anything wrong - if
> th
t
sure we should every again expect dramatic growth, but if we can move
towards a more stable or slowly growing community that would seem to make
an apocalyptic collapse less likely.
-Robert Rohde
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 7:56 PM, Pine W wrote:
> James,
>
> Yes, there is more to the stor
ce of a quite large effect before assuming there was an
important bias.
-Robert Rohde
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 2:20 AM, Fæ wrote:
> I have pulled together the following table together for the past 360 days,
> counting whenever an image was reverted by someone who was not the last
> uplo
that should be considered.
So, no, we can't force the WMF to respect our wishes, but we can hope that
they will work with us because a good relationship between the WMF and the
editor community is important for both groups.
-Robert Rohde
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Peter Southwood <
kis like enwiki.
-Robert Rohde
> On 11 August 2015 at 17:58, Robert Rohde wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Risker wrote:
> >
> >
> > > There are situations where not even the administrators of a particular
> > > community should be allowe
are useful.
Though hypothetically possible I can't think of any examples of an admin on
enwiki modifying a legal page in a harmful way, which makes it seem like
you have solution for a problem that doesn't actually exist.
-Robert Rohde
>
> On 11 August 2015 at 16:43, Romaine Wiki wrote:
short answer, I think there is no way that attribution which only
appeared within image metadata would be regarded as legally adequate under
current CC licenses. Such metadata is not sufficiently discoverable to
meet standards for "reasonable" attribution under the few cases that hav
tc.
However, I don't think that WMF Legal should get involved in cases where
someone wanted to do the right thing but failed. There is no need to waste
our resources on third-party cases where there is a significant risk of
losing.
-Robert Rohde
___
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Andy Mabbett
wrote:
> On 20 July 2015 at 18:09, Robert Rohde wrote:
>
> > it is also hard for me to get behind the
> > notion of punishing someone for demanding that reusers due the things
> that
> > Commons actually recommends t
me:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Forum/Archiv/2013/August#de:WP:URF.23Fotos_werden_Hochgeladen_-_gesucht_und_dann_gezielt_abgemahnt_.3F
-Robert Rohde
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 7:56 PM, Newyorkbrad wrote:
> I would have a serious problem with someone litigating, or threatening to
> litigate, ove
the perspective that it might not be. (I don't know the
history of the Commons pages, so I'm not really sure of the community's
thinking here.)
I do think there is something of a problem that Wikipedia models a behavior
(i.e. linking) that is different from what Commons recommends (i.e.
What do you mean by legalize? The license is what the license is, while we
might influence future versions of the license, we don't really control how
current licenses are interpreted. That is an issue for the courts.
There is a modest ambiguity in CC BY-SA 3.0 about the attribution clauses
(e.g
is more distant from the roots of Wikimedia.
Anyway, best wishes Erik. Your contributions and eloquence will be missed.
(Though I won't be shy in reminding you that you can still participate in
the WMF projects as a volunteer, should you get that itch. ;-) )
-Robert Rohde
P.S. Some of the s
So, you are offering a prize equivalent to US $2.50? Not exactly an
inspirational amount of money (though perhaps that is the point).
-Robert Rohde
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Brian wrote:
> I'm sure many of you recall the Netflix Prize
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
s cast, so good luck with it.
-Robert Rohde
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:03 PM, MZMcBride wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm of two minds here. I would love for mass surveillance to stop; the
> revelations of the past few years are disgusting. However, this lawsuit
> has the appearance of
it
is also possible that many of these language are "missing" in part because
the computer literate among the populations who speak these languages
actually prefer to edit in some other language (e.g. English).
Anyway, just a few thoughts.
-Robert Rohde
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 5:57 P
Yay!
I'm pretty sure there is a Jimbo quote somewhere about how the
Wikimedia logos would never ever be made free, and for once I am glad
that he was wrong. Or maybe it was Mike Godwin. Doesn't really
matter who said it, except to say that this seems like a remarkable
turn around compared to the
data
management solution. But am I correct in thinking that you asked the
question primarily out of a desire to think about how we could use
externally managed data sets?
-Robert Rohde
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:25 AM, David Cuenca wrote:
> Hi,
>
> During the Zürich Hackathon I met several peop
ue if regulatory fiats
or undiscovered flaws in the Bitcoin system cause their value to
plummet. I don't think holding on to high-risk investment vehicles
makes sense for a non-profit that aims to make responsible use of
people's donations.
-Robert Rohde
___
broad
dissemination of knowledge among people who have historically lacked
access to it, but I suppose some people might disagree.
-Robert Rohde
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wi
then there is no provision
allowing me to tell my boss or my subordinates unless I directly need
their help to satisfy the request. If someone with root access were
directly served with an NSL, it isn't obvious that WMF executives
would ever learn about
didn't warrant that.
-Robert Rohde
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Erik Moeller wrote:
> Hey Kevin,
>
> contrary to your belief (and in spite of your desire to blame me ;-),
> I actually have a ton of respect for the opinions you've expressed
> throughout the process, and
re may be room for some special purpose buttons, but many tasks are
going to need to be accomplished by generalized tools.
-Robert Rohde
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wi
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:24 PM, phoebe ayers wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> This is a great question. Would you mind adding it to the wiki so we don't
> lose track of it?
I don't mind adding it, but I'm not sure where you want it to go?
Also, should I copy your reply, too?
-Robert
__
r by conducting new comparison trials or by finding better ways
to tease out patterns in editing trends.
-Robert Rohde
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Steven Walling
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:13 AM, David Gerard wrote:
>
>> de:wp convinced you. What would it take to c
e complicated for authors than the present
version.
This is one of the examples where there would seem to be few good
alternatives. Maybe the devs who are imagining reengineering wikitext
can also think up good alternatives for some of the uses they might
contemplate making obsolete?
-Robert R
g the page that uses it, but there
is no general way to identify all templates that might be problematic
at the time the template is written.
-Robert Rohde
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wi
based, etc.
Is that something the Board ever involves itself in?
Given current plans, it seems likely that questions surrounding
changes in user experience and the deployment of new technology will
be among the most significant issues for the editor community.
-Robert Rohde
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013
rm of wide-scale deployment at
this time. It should also be acknowledged that many participants
agreed with the idea of a visual editor, in principle, but felt that
the current implementation wasn't yet adequate.
-Robert Rohde
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Bence Damokos wrote:
> Can so
problem once we are more than a
month past VE's launch. It would be nice to extend the graphs to two
or three months if possible to get a longer-term perspective.
-Robert Rohde
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 6:31 PM, James Salsman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Dario Taraborelli <
completely arbitrary
blocks of wikitext that would only be interpreted once the whole page
is assembled.
-Robert Rohde
[1]
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Metrics_and_activities_meetings/Quarterly_reviews/VisualEditor-Parsoid/July_2013
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Martijn Hoekstra
wrote:
> On
could also be
useful. Less complex tasks like communicating on talk pages might
also offer some information (though I suspect people who choose to be
anonymous might be less inclined to use talk pages regardless of other
experience / ability).
-Robert Rohde
top-down fashion
without much effort to determine whether the various communities
involved feel the software is ready.
-Robert Rohde
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:VisualEditor/RFC
[2]
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:VisualEditor%27s_effect_on_newly_registered_
mundane, but if
you look hard enough I'm sure some people might find things to object
to.
-Robert Rohde
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Charles Andrès
wrote:
> Wikipedia for prisoners – an unexpected partnership between a swiss prison
> and Wikimedia CH
>
> Following an initiati
x and recharge. It seems to be the case that many such
declared retirements aren't really permanent.
-Robert Rohde
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Robert Rohde wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Yaroslav M. Blanter
> wrote:
>
>
>> 1. What is the average lifetim
ork is being by
the relative old-timers. By the same token though, people who have
ever made it to 1000 edits are more likely than not to still be active
today.
-Robert Rohde
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubs
42 matches
Mail list logo
