As per the last input by James Heilman regarding multilingualism:
Whatever translations we could implement in the interactive graphs that may
imply some kind of a “mirroring back” to OWID, is a win-win for both projects
and for the sake of free knowledge. Considering the relevance of OWID in
Bon dia / Hi,
I would like to ask around about the fact that we have very significant
imbalances of official statistics when it comes to the traffic in our wiki
projects.
Let's look at the reading gross value for the English Wikipedia on January
2024. Without applying any kind of filtering to
Bon dia/Hi,
I don't want to add even more seriousness to the thread; I am happy to read
that there is an absolute agreement on the topic.
But interactivity is not only about embedding video: we currently must leave
each project to Toolforge for supporting editing tools, to Humanwiki to read
Hard email to read, but Galder's are quite of indisputable thoughts and the
harsh reality of Wikimedia's technological state of the art.
Yet this incontestability is, at the same time, the very profound problem: the
WMF will not refute it, nor structurally change it, besides silences and
Thank you very much, Amir!
I would like to know whether translations will be open in Translatewiki to make
it available and helpful for non-English speakers?
I would gladly translate it to a couple other languages! I also agree on the
views from Galder regarding the current non-existing
Bon dia / Hi,
Is there any available tool to precisely count how many days in a row a
Wikimedian from a specifif project has been editing? The source that is linked
in the Diffs page
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Database_reports/Longest_active_user_editing_streaks)is
only within
Bon dia / Hi,
Thank you for pointing this out, Andreas. This is exactly why there are more
and more voices against the mindset of the Wikimedia Foundation and its aims to
expand its coverage beyond what should be the technical maintenance and the
legal boundaries of the Wikimedia projects.
Hi/Bon dia,
To me, statements like "Platforms need to provide an easily understandable,
plain-language summary of their terms and conditions, in the languages of the
Member States where they operate" seem to perpetuate some problems (or legal
questions/gaps) of what will happen with those
Thank you Adel for adding up very valuable input and thoughts on my initial
concern. You explained the turnout, participation and the evaluation issues of
such an enforcement much better than I did in my first email.
Kind regards/Salutacions,
Xaviet Dengra
El dc, 15 febr., 2023 a 18:19, va
Hi/Bona vesprada,
Without meaning at all that I do not respect the results of this voting, I
would like to call the attention to the fact that out of 3097 votes,
practically 2000 are circumscribed to only 4 big home wikis: en.wiki (1000),
de.wiki (500), fr.wiki (200) and es.wiki (150).
Imho
Bon dia/Dear Esra'a
I consider myself quite critical regarding some kinds of conflicts of interest
within the Wikimedia movement, and I don't think this is at all a case of COI.
I congratulate you for your involvement and volunteering advocacy in different
free knowledge and internet
he artwork itself. Two tweets in the afternoon: the first one,
>> optional, about something related to Wikipedia itself (Statistics, projects,
>> some user who has created something cool...) and then science/technology in
>> a broad sense. At evening, we like to tweet somethin
Hi/Bon dia
Yaroslav: Also, you say one tweet per day is too little, how may do you think
is normal? If I personally see an account which tweets more than say 10 per day
(not counting threads) I start thinking may be it is a spam generator.
Since 4 years ago we updated the social media
Dear all / Bona nit,
Following Andreas' last message: as we started getting some questions and we
did not see any other official Wikimedia statement in regards of this specific
issue –the exorbitant prison sentence–, the Catalan Wikipedia community we
agreed via our Village Pump to publish
ternative;
>> boundary="=_NextPart_000_0023_01D8BC62.4CF06730"
>>
>> If I understand the CC-by-sa licence correctly, Wikipedia and WMF themselves
>> do not own the copyright, it is owned by the contributors who created the
>> text. They can take this up with Goo
Hi everyone,
Wikidata's 10th anniversary is coming in the following days and the social
media accounts start to talk about it, mostly from institutional/official
Wikimedia profiles. That's really good! As one of the responsibles of the
microblogging handles of the Catalan Wikimedia projects,
Hi all,
I want to bring a legal concern here on Google's misuse of our content. [It
came up today on
Twitter](https://twitter.com/epineda/status/1564143156702199813?s=20=z2xu6PMB29vvkpNB79p2iQ)
that the GoogleTV app had linked a movie description text in Catalan language
(which in principle
Hi Justice,
As the @euwikipedia "cannot even have a lookalike audience", which is your
threshold of representativeness?
Because I provided in the same thread on Meta the accurate data of @Viquipedia
(Catalan), for which we have 40K followers and hundreds of monthly article link
clicks, being
Hi Andreas,
Even if I agree with you in most of your points, I completely disagree about
asking others to try to amend with press editors the already published
interviews. The fact that the public discourse from the WMF’s front line is
imprecise is not new at all, but I don’t think that it
Bon dia a tothom/Hi everyone,
It's really difficult not to agree with Galder here. Happy to still read these
persistent colleagues with key arguments.
The same people that committed the big mistakes and failure with Wikimedia
Space (that should have never existed and that even combined
Hi / Bon dia,
I cannot agree more with the words of Gnangarra in his last email. And that's
exactly what I meant in the specific proposal of fixing issues in Commons that
moving all these key requests from their natural scope undermines the
recognition of the Wishlist (as an equal, useful, and
're logged in please head over to
> https://wikipedialibrary.wmflabs.org/suggest/ and add any suggestions you
> have, or 'upvote' other suggestions. We get all the content for the library
> through partnerships and this list, among others, directly feeds into our
> prioritisation o
Congratulations for this step forward and to everyone that has been involved!
The Wikipedia Library is amazing news for those that do not have institutional
accesses. I know that it’s a bit early for this question, but maybe someone can
already give me some answer :)
Is it expected that in the
Hi/Bon dia
As being said, I assume that the eligibility criteria for the award means that
some reviews or research articles published by colleagues or by me in Catalan
are considered second-class publications.
If publishing about Wikimedia in our mother languages (most of them minorized
at
Hi/Bona nit
Specifically regarding the last emails about videos and new formats in
university students and their use of Wikipedia. A truth is that we already had
the chance to integrate better multimedia contents and formats via some
channels that he already had: our sister projects.
Dear Johan,
I will be happy to participate in the testing, especially interested into
provide some feedback that can help the interface or navigation for minoritized
languages. You can count me in, as it looks interesting and useful.
However, please note that we are a *volunteering* movement,
It is definitely so sad to see those many abandoned tickets in Phabricator,
like the ones Galder has been sharing along this thread. The same for the very
interesting -and quite easy to implement- proposals that had lots of votes in
the previous Community Wishlists but that never succeeded.
It
Hi all,
Thank you for raising up this topic in the list, Florence. I fully agree with
you in all your points and find it of great concern, especially regarding
accountability of the WMF towards the community. But also because its
increasing agreements and decisions that are not thoroughly
Hi all,
As following the previous email from Galder, I completely agree that this topic
-if there is a trust in the work of Wikipedians and their communities, which I
am sure we all do- should be primarily debated, if not fully, in the
corresponding linguistical version of Wikipedia. As Jane
Dear all,
I have been reading and closely following this and many other similar topics
for a long time. I am sorry to say that for me, organising a concept like an
"Office Hour" and doing so via Youtube for a concern of these dimensions (that
affects the whole reputation of the movement), is
30 matches
Mail list logo
