Training sets already contain images from Commons, so yes, I believe
the implications should be considered.
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 4:46 PM Newyorkbrad wrote:
>
> This whole subject raises interesting and important legal and ethical
> issues, but are there any direct implications at this time for
From my background in neural networks, and my understanding of how
they work, I would say that your trained network is a derived work if
the weights are learned from a specific training sample. If it does
not learn from a specific sample it is not a derived work from that
sample. It is not sufficie
This whole subject raises interesting and important legal and ethical
issues, but are there any direct implications at this time for
Wikipedia/Wikimedia projects?
Newyorkbrad/IBM
On Sunday, January 19, 2020, Ryan Merkley wrote:
> I don't believe it implies that. As with many things legal, the
I don't believe it implies that. As with many things legal, the answer re:
derivatives is likely "it depends".
R.
On Sat, Jan 18, 2020, 10:30 PM Benjamin Ikuta
wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for that.
>
> Pardon me if I've missed something, but that seems to imply, but not
> directly state, that AI traini
Thanks for that.
Pardon me if I've missed something, but that seems to imply, but not directly
state, that AI training is a derivative work; could you clarify that?
On Jan 18, 2020, at 2:58 PM, Ryan Merkley wrote:
> [My comments are my own, and don’t reflect or suggest any official posit
On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 3:55 PM John Erling Blad wrote:
> People on another forum says portraits are personal data and use of
> them is a breach of Art. 6 GDPR Lawfulness of processing. This creates
> a problem in most European countries. This is a breach of privacy
> laws, and not a copyright is
People on another forum says portraits are personal data and use of
them is a breach of Art. 6 GDPR Lawfulness of processing. This creates
a problem in most European countries. This is a breach of privacy
laws, and not a copyright issue.[1]
Not sure how to interpret the local copyright law on this
[My comments are my own, and don’t reflect or suggest any official position
from WMF]
The NBC story linked below come out about a year ago. Around the same time,
when I was CEO at Creative Commons, we published a statement and updated FAQs
that attempted to respond to questions being asked abou
There are several reports of face recognition going mainstream, often
in less than optimum circumstances, and often violating copyright and
licenses
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/18/technology/clearview-privacy-facial-recognition.html
https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/internet/facial-recognition-s-di
