Hi,
Any CC license on Wikidata would be like puting a copyright on facts.
I obviously strongly object on that, and therefore I also strongly object
puting anything other than public domain or CC0 on Wikidata.
The whole database could have
___
Just to make it clear; the discussions at the dev-project was in April-May
2012, linking of wd-items on site late in 29 October 2012 (actually 29.
October), Danny told us about his new Google job in January 2013.
I believe someone must have gotten this backwards.
You can copyright an expression about facts, but you can't copyright the
facts. In some jurisdictions a collection of facts can be given a special
protection, but still the individual facts are not protected.
>>A single property licensing scheme would allow storage of data,
>>it might or might
Hi,
Did not read your whole argument, but as a collection of brute facts, it
is hard to see how the content of wikidata could
be in something else than public domain.
As a whole, the database could present a Sui generis database right
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sui_generis_database_right) ,
Hi Mathieu,
I understand you care a lot about this topic and are posting about it
in many places but I have a personal rule that a lot of the people in
Wikidata know. I am willing to discuss and explain basically anything
on a calm and rational basis. (And I did this on-wiki I believe.) The
rule
2017-11-29 23:45 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Stumpf Guntz <
psychosl...@culture-libre.org>:
> Now, what would be the additional cost of storing sources in
> Wikidata? Well, zero cost. Actually, it's already here as the
> "reference" attribute is part of the Wikibase item structure. So
>
