??? writes:
On 02/06/2014 21:14, Mike Godwin wrote:
Google has a clear purpose too, and it was no defense. Plus, there is
a public-interest argument in favor of eschewing the erasure of true,
accurate public data that happens to be old.
There is nothing in the judgement about erasing true,
Whatever the right to be forgotten may turn out to be, it's not
about publication of previously unpublished information. Ergo, it's
not about invasion of privacy, broadly speaking. The opinion makes
clear that one can publish true, accurate, already-published
information and nevertheless be
Chris writes:
I think there's a philosophical issue about privacy here. As far as I can
see the ECJ interprets privacy as the right to enjoy a private life, and
sees any party holding a significant amount of data about a private
individual without good reason as a potential infringement on
(note any comments here are entirely my own personal opinion)
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Mike Godwin mnemo...@gmail.com wrote:
The ECJ said the
right to be forgotten applies when the data aggregated appear to be
inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant, or excessive in relation
to
On 6/2/14, 10:55 PM, ??? wrote:
There is no public interest in how many time celeb X got a detention
at school for not doing their homework at junior high.
Isn't that the kind of information you would in fact expect to find in a
biography of any kind of public figure? If I were reading a
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Todd Allen toddmal...@gmail.com wrote:
Would WMF, being in the US, need to worry about this to any greater degree
than it worries about, say, Chinese publishing restrictions, or UK
superinjunctions?
First, WMF operates globally, and while I took pains as general
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Chris Keating
chriskeatingw...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't believe Wikipedia could be a data controller as it has no legal
personality, and legal personality is quite difficult to acquire when
you
set out to avoid acquiring it.
On this point I must disagree.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Mike Godwin mnemo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Todd Allen toddmal...@gmail.com wrote:
Would WMF, being in the US, need to worry about this to any greater
degree
than it worries about, say, Chinese publishing restrictions, or UK
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
Does the ECJ need to establish jurisdiction over Wikimedia or specific users
(presumably only those users directly involved in creating or curating the
content in dispute)? We've seen in some situations in the past (e.g. with
On 03/06/2014 12:53, Mark wrote:
On 6/2/14, 10:55 PM, ??? wrote:
There is no public interest in how many time celeb X got a detention
at school for not doing their homework at junior high.
Isn't that the kind of information you would in fact expect to find in a
biography of any kind of public
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 5:23 PM, ??? wiki-l...@phizz.demon.co.uk wrote:
On 03/06/2014 12:53, Mark wrote:
On 6/2/14, 10:55 PM, ??? wrote:
There is no public interest in how many time celeb X got a detention
at school for not doing their homework at junior high.
Isn't that the kind of
On 03/06/2014 22:35, Nathan wrote:
Interesting. Can you link me to a biography where a school detention is the
main feature of the article?
How about this 8 yo?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Emmanuel_of_Belgium#Biography
What about these other kids?
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 6:54 PM, ??? wiki-l...@phizz.demon.co.uk wrote:
On 03/06/2014 22:35, Nathan wrote:
Interesting. Can you link me to a biography where a school detention is
the
main feature of the article?
How about this 8 yo?
On 04/06/2014 00:06, Nathan wrote:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 6:54 PM, ??? wiki-l...@phizz.demon.co.uk wrote:
On 03/06/2014 22:35, Nathan wrote:
Interesting. Can you link me to a biography where a school detention is
the
main feature of the article?
How about this 8 yo?
Chris writes:
If as a private citizen in the EU you construct a card-file index of
newspaper cuttings (or any other kind of database) including personal
details about a group of individuals, you are becoming both a data
processor and data controller.
I think that's the plain meaning of the
Would WMF, being in the US, need to worry about this to any greater degree
than it worries about, say, Chinese publishing restrictions, or UK
superinjunctions?
On Jun 2, 2014 2:15 PM, Mike Godwin mnemo...@gmail.com wrote:
Chris writes:
If as a private citizen in the EU you construct a
I don't believe Wikipedia could be a data controller as it has no legal
personality, and legal personality is quite difficult to acquire when you
set out to avoid acquiring it.
On this point I must disagree.
I'd be interested to hear why :-)
I think also though that if editors are
On 02/06/2014 21:14, Mike Godwin wrote:
Google has a clear purpose too, and it was no defense. Plus, there is
a public-interest argument in favor of eschewing the erasure of true,
accurate public data that happens to be old.
There is nothing in the judgement about erasing true, acaccurate
18 matches
Mail list logo
