tances.
> Cheers
> Peter
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On
> Behalf Of Amir E. Aharoni
> Sent: 22 February 2019 10:39
> To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Inisghts from a meeting wit
s
> Peter
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On
> Behalf Of Amir E. Aharoni
> Sent: 22 February 2019 10:39
> To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Inisghts from a meeting with NGO representatives
>
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 9:52 AM Amir E. Aharoni <
amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il> wrote:
> Do the people to whom you speak have the same understanding of what our
> definition of knowledge is?
I guess I can make them aware of it from now on :-)
___
List
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Inisghts from a meeting with NGO representatives
בתאריך יום ו׳, 22 בפבר׳ 2019 ב-10:30 מאת David Cuenca Tudela <
dacu...@gmail.com>:
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2019, 08:27 Amir E. Aharoni,
> wrote:
>
> > What is our definition of knowledge?
בתאריך יום ו׳, 22 בפבר׳ 2019 ב-10:30 מאת David Cuenca Tudela <
dacu...@gmail.com>:
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2019, 08:27 Amir E. Aharoni,
> wrote:
>
> > What is our definition of knowledge?
> >
>
> In my opinion, the informal definition would be: all the information that
> the Wikimedia community
On Fri, 22 Feb 2019, 08:27 Amir E. Aharoni,
wrote:
> What is our definition of knowledge?
>
In my opinion, the informal definition would be: all the information that
the Wikimedia community allows into their projects.
Regards,
Micru
>
___
בתאריך יום ב׳, 18 בפבר׳ 2019, 13:04, מאת David Cuenca Tudela <
dacu...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Amir,
>
>
> *How can the Wikimedia movement be more truly international *
> Participants reported that the current definition of knowledge by Wikimedia
> projects is narrow-minded and does not fit the
Hi Mark,
Benjamin and me we had a Skype conversation about this topic. Maybe he can
elaborate with his insights?
Regards
Micru
On Thu, 21 Feb 2019, 19:11 Mark Rousell, wrote:
> On 18/02/2019 11:04, David Cuenca Tudela wrote:
> > the current definition of knowledge by Wikimedia
> > projects is
On 18/02/2019 11:04, David Cuenca Tudela wrote:
> the current definition of knowledge by Wikimedia
> projects is narrow-minded and does not fit the relationship with knowledge
> that exists in other parts of the world.
This sounds intriguing. Can you expand on it?
--
Mark Rousell
Hi Micru,
How about documenting your insights on here. I know a number of people in
the Roles & Responsibilities group have been reading with interest, thank
you very much for sharing.
Thank you for this.
Could you elaborate on the definition of knowledge, please?
This is something I've long been interested in.
On Feb 18, 2019, at 3:04 AM, David Cuenca Tudela wrote:
> Hi Amir,
>
>
> *How can the Wikimedia movement be more truly international *
> Participants
@Benjamin: It is already there, as answer to Farkhad.
@Ziko: I have no idea where to store this. If you find a suitable place,
please go ahead and let me know.
Regards,
Micru
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 3:11 PM Ziko van Dijk wrote:
> Hello, maybe there is a suitable place on Meta Wiki to conserve
Hello, maybe there is a suitable place on Meta Wiki to conserve this? Later
it will be a little bit difficult to find it again on a mailinglist.
I myself find this point of view of "outsiders" very interesting and worth
to notice e.g. in strategic discussions.
Kind regards
Ziko
Am Mo., 18. Feb.
I'd be interested in hearing about perceptions of the movement.
On Feb 17, 2019, at 3:35 PM, David Cuenca Tudela wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Last Friday I participated in a workshop in Brussels where people from
> different NGOs met to learn from each other to foster flat,
> democratic, and
Hi Amir,
*How can the Wikimedia movement be more truly international *
Participants reported that the current definition of knowledge by Wikimedia
projects is narrow-minded and does not fit the relationship with knowledge
that exists in other parts of the world. The only way to break this cycle
Hi Bodhisattwa,
*Community model of affiliates *
Many participants reported difficulties building trust with volunteers. It
is very easy to lose the volunteer appeal if the organisation is not
conscious about their needs, and there is no active communication. I
reported the case of Amical, which
Hi Bodhisattwa,
*Governance recommendation *
I assisted to a session on sociocracy organized by the Transition Network
that basically blew my mind. The speaker explained how for her it has been
always difficult to participate in decision-making because she feels that
she is a very vocal person,
Hi Farkhad,
*External perception of the movement*
The Wikimedia movement is seen as a very complex entity. Most participants
knew about Wikipedia, not so many about the other projects. Even for those
who knew Wikipedia, it was not so clear how decisions are taken or what is
allowed to do. I
Hi Micru,
I am interested about your thoughts about governance recommendation for the
movement and community model of affiliates.
Regards,
Bodhisattwa
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019, 12:14 Фархад Фаткуллин / Farkhad Fatkullin <
f...@yandex.com wrote:
> Micru,
> I would be interested to learn about
Micru,
I would be interested to learn about "External perception of the movement".part
of your insights.
Thanks.
from Russia with love,
farhad
https://ru.wikimedia.org/wiki/Smart_region
--
Farhad Fatkullin - Фархад Фаткуллин http://sikzn.ru/ Тел.+79274158066 /
skype:frhdkazan /
I'm interested.
I'm especially interested in any recommendation that is even remotely
related to how can the Wikimedia movement be more truly international, and
it sounds like there could be something about it there, but even if there
isn't, is love to hear the rest.
Thanks!
בתאריך יום ב׳, 18
Hello,
Last Friday I participated in a workshop in Brussels where people from
different NGOs met to learn from each other to foster flat,
democratic, and diverse organisations. I was one of four speakers in a
"world cafe" format (basically a circle where participants can
interact with the
22 matches
Mail list logo
