Pacience.
2013/2/21 Charles Andrès :
> HI Ziko,
>
> Could you give us more information about this action team?, and especially
> its composition because there is few information here
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Chapters_Association/Research , no
> more on the minute of your meet
HI Ziko,
Could you give us more information about this action team?, and especially its
composition because there is few information here
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Chapters_Association/Research , no
more on the minute of your meeting in London, and I don't remind any public
cal
Hi, Michal and I will soon come up with a general question to the
movement, in the frame of the action team "research". Maybe today or
tomorrow.
Kind regards
Ziko
2013/2/21 Markus Glaser :
> Am 21.02.2013 15:57, schrieb Manuel Schneider:
>
>> I think I have to agree that one announce list is enoug
Am 21.02.2013 15:57, schrieb Manuel Schneider:
I think I have to agree that one announce list is enough. As we haven't
started using the wca-announce yet I see no problem in agreeing that we
use wikimedia-announce-l instead.
/Manuel
+1
We can use a [wca] tag in the subject line as you suggest
Am 20.02.2013 14:03, schrieb Fae:
> On 20 February 2013 08:59, Christophe Henner
> wrote:
>> Why do we need two "announce" mailing lists? Can't we all use
>> wikimedia-announce ?
>
> I don't really care much about how it works, just that it does. Manuel
> Schneider took an action at the weekend
Hi Charles,
from the feedback we had about the WCA, IMHO we need to consider two
different issues:
* we are criticised for focussing on structures too much. In London, as
you can see in the protocol [1], we discussed several options including
the one about an executive board, but decided to le
On 21 Feb 2013, at 13:01, Manuel Schneider
wrote:
> The list already exists since several months but hasn't been used yet:
>
> https://intern.wikimedia.ch/lists/listinfo/wca-announce
>
> /Manuel
When I offered to create the list I considered that it would be better to have
the list on WMF se
The list already exists since several months but hasn't been used yet:
https://intern.wikimedia.ch/lists/listinfo/wca-announce
/Manuel
Am 19.02.2013 21:09, schrieb Michael Peel:
>
> On 19 Feb 2013, at 19:57, Thehelpfulone wrote:
>
>> On 19 February 2013 16:10, Ziko van Dijk wrote:
>>
>>> The
I support the email of Charles.
I would invite you to take in consideration a more flexible model and to
give the role of the chair or vice-chair to the chapters (may be
rotating the functions) and not to a single person.
Afterwards the chapter may decide who will be the person in charge, but
Dear Fae,
I find it contradictory to consider that anticipated election of the chair is
good for WCA but that for the vice chair it would be bad, if we need to have
elections before Milano we can have both in parallel.
Anyway I was, and I'm still oppose to anticipated election. Since the
be
On 20 February 2013 08:59, Christophe Henner
wrote:
> Why do we need two "announce" mailing lists? Can't we all use
> wikimedia-announce ?
I don't really care much about how it works, just that it does. Manuel
Schneider took an action at the weekend to advise on points of
contact, and set up the
Why do we need two "announce" mailing lists? Can't we all use
wikimedia-announce ?
Christophe
--
Christophe
On 20 February 2013 09:22, Charles Andrès wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In fact this mailing list has already been created since a while, it's just
> not used for the moment.
>
> The question of
On 20 February 2013 07:57, Charles Andrès wrote:
> Hello Ziko,
>
> Because you want to hear:
>
> 1)Their is no census within the chapter whether we still want a deputy chair
> position
It's better for us to focus on the actions we are taking for the next
3 months. We decided to defer discussion
Hello,
In fact this mailing list has already been created since a while, it's just
not used for the moment.
The question of the hosting hasn't been discuss in this way, for the WCA WMCH
is offering the hosting of chapters mailing list, "chapters wiki", and some
"chapter wiki". So it has just
From Ziko's note about this:
> There will be a special list 'WCA-announcements". If you want to be
> informed about Bulletins and discussions, join the list and you will
> get links to Meta Wiki. It's a one-way-list, because the discussions
> are supposed to be on Meta Wiki. This is a WCA service f
Hello Ziko,
Because you want to hear:
1)Their is no census within the chapter whether we still want a deputy chair
position
2)if we keep a chair and a deputy chair, it has always been planned that this
position should be open to vote at the next WCA meeting
3) 7 council member connote decide
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Fae wrote:
> On 19 February 2013 23:47, James Alexander wrote:
> ...
> > Groups should grow naturally, they should incorporate only when necessary
> > and get staff only when necessary, trying to push them before they are
> > ready only makes things worse. We ha
On 19 February 2013 23:47, James Alexander wrote:
...
> Groups should grow naturally, they should incorporate only when necessary
> and get staff only when necessary, trying to push them before they are
> ready only makes things worse. We have been having a long standing habit
> within the meta m
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Ziko van Dijk wrote:
> Hello,
> Just to keep in mind: it has been no secret, from the beginning, that the
> WCA planned to hire somebody. The WMF board is supported by employees too,
> and I guess that the WMF has a number of regulations. Enough room for views
> to
Hi,
sorry, no offense meant, but all of you are keep saying the same things
again and again. At least a dozen times I've read lines, like "don't focus
on this, focus on that" or let me say WCA recruiting athough you dropped
that idea about two weeks ago (really?)
I'd like to help you with focusin
Hello,
Just to keep in mind: it has been no secret, from the beginning, that the
WCA planned to hire somebody. The WMF board is supported by employees too,
and I guess that the WMF has a number of regulations. Enough room for views
to evolve.
But it sounds good to focus on getting things started in
yeah, I was going to suggest the same thing, why make a different list with
different membership?
Jan-Bart (personally agreeing with mike's personal viewpoint… please don't take
it personally)
On Feb 19, 2013, at 9:09 PM, Michael Peel wrote:
>
> On 19 Feb 2013, at 19:57, Thehelpfulone wro
On 19 Feb 2013, at 19:57, Thehelpfulone wrote:
> On 19 February 2013 16:10, Ziko van Dijk wrote:
>
>> There will be a special list 'WCA-announcements". If you want to be
>> informed about Bulletins and discussions, join the list and you will
>> get links to Meta Wiki. It's a one-way-list, beca
On 19 February 2013 16:10, Ziko van Dijk wrote:
> There will be a special list 'WCA-announcements". If you want to be
> informed about Bulletins and discussions, join the list and you will
> get links to Meta Wiki. It's a one-way-list, because the discussions
> are supposed to be on Meta Wiki. Th
Hey
So just to add my perspective on the mail below (as one of the two board
members that were present).
As mentioned before the board has several big issues with the WCA where it was
going (as outlined on the meta discussion page and our statement:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedi
Dear Council Members and everyone interested in the WCA,
On 16/17th February 2013 a number of Council Members visited the
London Conference I had proposed in mid January to talk about the way
of the WCA and to prepare the Wikimedia Conference in Milan. We are
happy that the London Conference did h
26 matches
Mail list logo
