[Wikimedia-l] Quality on different language version

2014-06-09 Thread Anders Wennersten
I have several times asked for a professional qualty study of our different laguage versions, but not seen it exist or being done. To ?provoke? I therefor list here my subjective impression after daily looking into the different version for 5-15 articles (new ones being created on sv.wp) (I li

[Wikimedia-l] GLAM track, wikimania 2014: 11 US/UK, 2 DE, 2 cooperation, 2 rest of the world

2014-06-09 Thread rupert THURNER
hi, fyi, a statistical analysis about the GLAM track and where the presentations are from: 4 entries are US: https://wikimania2014.wikimedia.org/wiki/Submissions/Open_Authority:_A_New_Way_to_Talk_to_GLAMs https://wikimania2014.wikimedia.org/wiki/Submissions/The_Future_of_Libraries_and_Wikipedia h

Re: [Wikimedia-l] GLAM track, wikimania 2014: 11 US/UK, 2 DE, 2 cooperation, 2 rest of the world

2014-06-09 Thread
On 9 June 2014 10:28, rupert THURNER wrote: > hi, > > fyi, a statistical analysis about the GLAM track and where the ... > as a summary, 11 US/UK, 2 DE, 2 cooperation, 2 rest of the world. 2 > persons give 2 presentations (both UK)... Could someone check the last couple of Wikimanias and provide

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Quality on different language version

2014-06-09 Thread Balázs Viczián
Hi, I guess mgwp is in Malagasy, not Hungarian :) Cheers, Balazs being done. > > To ?provoke? I therefor list here my subjective impression after daily > looking into the different version for 5-15 articles (new ones being > created on sv.wp) (I list them in order how often I use them to calibr

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Rethink of observability

2014-06-09 Thread Edward Saperia
On 5 June 2014 19:33, Michael Snow wrote: > On 6/5/2014 11:11 AM, Pete Forsyth wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Michael Snow >> wrote: >> >>> Pete's were again primarily social and community-based, but at this level >>> of discussion we should be looking at both social features and t

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wikiconference USA in the media

2014-06-09 Thread Newyorkbrad
Russavia, despite the smilie, your last comment suggests that someone would create a biography of a living person in retaliation for the fact that she wrote unflatteringly and made errors in a piece about the Wikiconference. BLPs must never be created or edited as a form of retaliation against the

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wikiconference USA in the media

2014-06-09 Thread Pete Forsyth
NewYorkBrad, How is your commenting on it better than Russavia commenting on it? I am pretty sure everybody who takes the time to join an email list like this would agree, starting an article for retaliatory reasons is an abhorrent practice. But surely you can't be claiming it doesn't happen? If i

[Wikimedia-l] First _draft_ goals for WMF engineering/product

2014-06-09 Thread Erik Moeller
Hi all, We've got the first DRAFT (sorry for shouting, but can't hurt to emphasize :)) of the annual goals for the engineering/product department up on mediawiki.org. We're now mid-point in the process, and will finalize through June. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Engineering/2014-15_G

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Quality on different language version

2014-06-09 Thread Pine W
Hi Anders, may I suggest that you ask your good question on Wiki-Research-l? I know some work has been done on this subject but it's not at my fingertips. https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l Pine On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Balázs Viczián wrote: > Hi, > > I guess