thank you erik, and martin for this! currently more than 600 persons
express that this story should be resolved by reverting to the state
before it started:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Umfragen/Superschutz . while i
thought originally who cares, i do think now beeing sorry is
expressed
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
Nonetheless, I'm having difficulty understanding how these two statements:
the Wikimedia Foundation reserves the right to determine the final
configuration of the MediaViewer feature,
We’re absolutely not saying
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
[1] http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Task_force
I meant to say - the one example where we've tried targeted task
forces that I can think of was this one, as part of the strategy
process years ago. IIRC some of the task
Erik,
I am curious to hear your thoughts about the proposed Technology Committee.
That idea has some community support and had been discussed at some length
on the WMF Board Noticeboard.
Pine
On Aug 19, 2014 11:55 PM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:48 PM,
Pine W skrev 2014-08-20 09:32:
Erik,
I am curious to hear your thoughts about the proposed Technology Committee.
That idea has some community support and had been discussed at some length
on the WMF Board Noticeboard.
I second that question
The mediaviewer has never been an issue on the
With 11 days remaining in August, I'd like to remind everyone that
Wikimedia-l's guidelines[0] ask that subscribers keep their post count
below at most 30 per month. This guideline exists to help curb the
temptation to weigh in on absolutely every point raised, turning what
could otherwise be a
Forwarding to the to-be-revived treasurers mailing list. ~ Seb35
--- Message réexpédié---
De: Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com
A: Wikimedia Mailing List Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Cc:
Sujet: [Wikimedia-l] Accounting software for thematic orgs
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 06:54:41 +0200
Hi all,
Hi Pine,
you may want to evaluate CiviCRM.
It is not perfect but supports accounting (rather than just recording
donations as before) about a year.
The advantage of CiviCRM is the fact that it integrates membership
management, mailings, donors management and that it can be used
centrally by all
Hi Pine,
I started off doing the accounts at WMUK several years ago and looked at a
fair few different systems, including open source.
Initially we used Gnucash, I believe, but because no-one else used it -
including our auditors - it was not very useful when we needed to create
year end
Thanks for this.
You might want to filter it, though: For example
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q85256 states born in 1606 (no month or day
given), but your report at
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Ladsgroup/Birth_date_report2/26 gives it
as 1606-01-01, which then conflicts with the date
It's up to Carolynnes team to figure out if they want to use it or not.
--tomasz
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Dan Garry dga...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I could be mistaken, but I think Tomasz is the owner. CCing him.
Dan
On 13 August 2014 11:19, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk
11 matches
Mail list logo
