Hi Roger / Alphos,
On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 10:01 PM, Alphos OGame
wrote:
> Traceability of information does not pertain with who imported said
> information on Wikidata. Could be an unregistered user, could be a bot,
> could be a Wikimedian in residence or even the Pope himself, it doesn't
>
Hoi,
This same mail was send at the same time to the Wikidata mailing list.. The
answer there is argued in a different way with an utterly different
outcome.. This is an example of forum shopping and the result is that there
is no single outcome, it is great example why forum shopping does not
Hello Mathieu! I agree that tracing the full history of a data cite is
important, independent of license. I'm thinking about scalable solutions
for this.
It's definitely not the only factor in reliability; but it does matter who
entered the data (for instance) as one way to estimate the
Hello,
You seem to be mistaken.
Traceability of information does not pertain with who imported said
information on Wikidata. Could be an unregistered user, could be a bot,
could be a Wikimedian in residence or even the Pope himself, it doesn't
make a difference in the world.
What matters in
Hi Andra,
I agree this is misconception that a copyright license make any direct
change to data reliability. But attribution requirement does somewhat
indirectly have an impact on it, as it legally enforce traceability.
That is I strongly disagree with the following assertion: "a license
