Please please please take this conversation to another venue. It has little
to nothing to do with this movement.
Joe
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 18:15, geni wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 07:23, James Salsman wrote:
> >
> > Geni, it's the "Day of the Dead" now so I want to attempt to resurrect
> >
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 07:23, James Salsman wrote:
>
> Geni, it's the "Day of the Dead" now so I want to attempt to resurrect
> this thread.
>
> Is FoldingCoin still vulnerable to a 51% attack? What is a 51% attack?
You've had 6 months to do this basic research.
> Do you think it is reasonable
Hey all,
The Wikimedia Foundation does not hold cryptocurrency in Bitcoin. Whilst we
do accept bitcoin donations, this is currently done indirectly via BitPay
which converts from Bitcoin/Bitcash to Dollars prior to receipt.
This is documented on our Ways to Give page:
> Is FoldingCoin still vulnerable to a 51% attack?
It's still highly vulnerable to a 51% attack because there is
literally no way to combat the basic principle without giving up on
the idea of decentralization.
> I don't know anything about FoldingCoin and whether it is more or less
>
Hey,
For once, I'll make this one short : I agree, let's stay away from widely
fluctuating, purely fiduciary, resources-hogging (and no, FLDC does *not*
rely on "clean electricity", it's still an energy hog like the lot of
them), crypto-currencies.
And while we're at it, pretty please, let's also
I think any involvement in it is nonsensical and nobody should
entertain any of these ideas for a moment.
- d.
On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 at 16:42, James Salsman wrote:
>
> David, what if the Foundation converted their next largest bitcoin
> donation over some set amount to foldingcoin, and then cash
David, what if the Foundation converted their next largest bitcoin
donation over some set amount to foldingcoin, and then cash in a press
event designed to educate cryptocurrency enthusiasts that they don't
have to be as destructive, strictly as a principled stance against
bitcoin's waste of
worth noting again that in my (I am paid to have these opinions now)
professional opinion, nothing about cryptocurrencies is good or
useful, and WMF's involvement should proceed precisely as far as
taking donations at arm's length (never touching an actual
cryptocurrency). And documenting the
That is a complete useless responds. Bitcoin, Litecoin and all are no piramide
games.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 1 Nov 2018, at 11:57, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
>
> Hoi,
> Bitcoin and its ilk rely on an overabundance of energy. In this day and age
> the speculation of these "currencies" is
Hoi,
Bitcoin and its ilk rely on an overabundance of energy. In this day and age
the speculation of these "currencies" is irresponsible. The best attack on
this pyramide game is to stay away from it.
Thanks,
GerardM
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 10:38, Robert Rohde wrote:
> > What is a 51% attack?
> What is a 51% attack?
A 51% attack is when a single malicious entity controls >51% of the
computing power being used to validate the blockchain of a particular
digital currency. Blockchain-based digital currencies rely on a consensus
of computing participants acting in good faith to verify
Geni, it's the "Day of the Dead" now so I want to attempt to resurrect
this thread.
Is FoldingCoin still vulnerable to a 51% attack? What is a 51% attack?
Do you think it is reasonable for the Foundation to convert bitcoin to
FoldingCoin as part of its program to source clean electricity?
Best
> Cryptocurrency. If your first thought isn't "how could a scammer
> exploit this" you are doing it wrong.
I've thought about that for several hours now, and I'm sure scammers
far prefer bitcoin. Folding@Home's lab director is a partner
Andreessen Horowitz, so he has certainly had no lack of
On 12 April 2018 at 14:50, James Salsman wrote:
>> Only works if most people aren't trying to scam you
>
> What else works that way?
>
Thing where most people don't have money on the line. Its
Cryptocurrency. If your first thought isn't "how could a scammer
exploit this" you
> Only works if most people aren't trying to scam you
What else works that way?
> you'd need to get Bitpay to accept FoldingCoin in this arrangement
https://twitter.com/jsalsman/status/984428258530705408
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 4:39 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> On 11 April
On 11 April 2018 at 22:56, geni wrote:
> But the foundation wants actual money (US$ mostly). Why convert
> bitcoin into anything other than cash (which is what it does at the
> moment)?
in fact, I believe the WMF never touches a bitcoin - BitPay takes in
the bitcoins,
On 11 April 2018 at 22:37, James Salsman wrote:
> Proof is stochastic, by random audit of submitted results, as I
> understand the situation.
Only works if most people aren't trying to scam you. Which if you've
had any experience with concurrency you will realise is not the
> FoldingCoin is the one where you give fake results to Folding@home
> (since the maths is NP hard there is no real time way to check if your
> results are real or not)
Proof is stochastic, by random audit of submitted results, as I
understand the situation. I'm not sure whether that
On 10 April 2018 at 22:45, James Salsman wrote:
> The Foundation has been accepting BitCoin donations. Unfortunately,
> BitCoin is very wasteful in terms of electricity, and is therefore a
> dirty cryptocurrency.
They all are. The only difference is that bitcoin is Asic mined
This is an awful idea.
The primary reason the WMF needs to accept Bitcoin as a donation is due to
the substantial tax benefits accepting it gives to donors. It is an asset
that has increased massively in value, and holders can donate it and deduct
the current value from their taxes, without
What would the expected energy savings be of such a move?
Accepting more cryptocurrencies may make sense if the foundation can do
that in a way that does not take a lot of effort. But to stop accepting
bitcoin seems counterproductive to our mission.
Chico Venancio
Em Ter, 10 de abr de 2018
The Foundation has been accepting BitCoin donations. Unfortunately,
BitCoin is very wasteful in terms of electricity, and is therefore a
dirty cryptocurrency.
I recommend that the Foundation immediately cease accepting BitCoin,
and require donors who wish to donate in cryptocurrency to convert to
22 matches
Mail list logo