aand it's dead Jim:
http://lesswrong.com/r/discussion/lw/otq/whats_up_with_arbital/
The front page is now a "coming soon" for the proposed blogging
platform. Oh well.
- d.
On 11 October 2016 at 22:52, David Gerard wrote:
> Followup on this: Arbital is still going (recent changes shows
> con
Followup on this: Arbital is still going (recent changes shows
consistent activity, mostly from MIRI people) and now has the tag line
"Arbital is the place for crowdsourced, intuitive math explanations."
This is an area it might actually get somewhere with - en:wp's
mathematics articles are notorio
Le 14/03/2016 02:03, David Gerard a écrit :
Being put together by Eliezer Yudkowsky of LessWrong. Content is
cc-by-sa 3.0, don't know about the software.
https://arbital.com/p/arbital_ambitions/
Rather than the "encyclopedia" approach, it tries to be more
pedagogical, teaching the reader at the
Aye, the user-assessment model is kind of interesting, but agreed.
When I think "who can explain complex things in relateable terms?", my
answer has never been (and will never be) Bayesians.
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Craig Franklin
wrote:
> They have correctly identified that a lot of our
They have correctly identified that a lot of our articles on scientific
concepts are jargon-filled babble that is unintelligible to anyone who
isn't already an expert in the field (and if they're an expert, why are
they consulting an encyclopaedia?), but I'm not that confident that
Yudkowsky of all
I for one look forward to the open and inclusive educational
experience provided by people who collectively lose their shit when
presented with a highly improbable AI thought experiment[0]
[0] http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Roko's_basilisk
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 9:03 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> Bei