Hi Mingli, may I suggest that you post some of your interesting thoughts in
IdeaLab so that others can work with them and build on them?
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Idealab
Pine
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 1:42 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks for the addendum. :-)
Sorry for re-activate this thread again, this time I want to address the
observability on social networks.
Today content of or links to Wikipedia are spread all over the web.
So the observability are not limited only for Wikipedia users, but for the
whole
internet users.
Let's take a look what
Thanks for the addendum. :-)
Mingli Yuan, 01/07/2014 08:44:
The content provider label their own content with some metadata.
And Twitter/Facebook/etc will show a rich content on their timelines.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=54829hide_resolved=1
tracks this. Bug
On 5 June 2014 19:33, Michael Snow wikipe...@frontier.com wrote:
On 6/5/2014 11:11 AM, Pete Forsyth wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Michael Snow wikipe...@frontier.com
wrote:
Pete's were again primarily social and community-based, but at this level
of discussion we should be
One small step forward might be to add more support to 'groups' in the
mediawiki codebase. Groups could help organize the various subcommunities.
Perhaps consider this a federal system for wikipedia. ;)
I have been experimenting with real-time collaborative editors on
wikipedia. One question
June 2014 04:54 PM
To: Wikimedia Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Rethink of observability
One small step forward might be to add more support to 'groups' in the
mediawiki codebase. Groups could help organize the various subcommunities.
Perhaps consider this a federal system for wikipedia
You could start by listing the ad hoc methods. Others might add to the
list.
The list might inspire alternative ideas.
--scott
Yes, Scott. We should do that.
Collect what we had invented or some interesting new ideas, and then try to
reorganize them into an order, in such a way, we can
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Mingli Yuan mingli.y...@gmail.com wrote:
* Towards better content and community, what is the most important things
we want our user to observe?
Mingli,
Thank you for raising this excellent and important question.
I have long maintained -- and I think many
On 6/5/2014 10:43 AM, Mingli Yuan wrote:
If you visit the early page of c2.com, you will find the idea
of observability is one pillar principle of wiki software, and just follow
the idea, Ward invent the RecentChanges for all wikis.
At that time c2 is very small; now Wikipedia is so big. The
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Michael Snow wikipe...@frontier.com
wrote:
Pete's were again primarily social and community-based, but at this level
of discussion we should be looking at both social features and technical
ones.
YES YES YES!
However, the current priorities of the Wikimedia
I am really so glad to see your post, Mingli. I hope you are well :--)
Yes, this idea of observability is great.
RecentChanges was a real strength of early wikis.
Now we have so much metadata about pages and edits, we could cluster
results in a more meaningful way...
Also: what other ideas
Mingli Yuan, 05/06/2014 19:43:
If you visit the early page of c2.com, you will find the idea
of observability is one pillar principle of wiki software, and just follow
the idea, Ward invent the RecentChanges for all wikis.
Can you please find that specific page/formulation of the principle?
On 6/5/2014 11:11 AM, Pete Forsyth wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Michael Snow wikipe...@frontier.com
wrote:
Pete's were again primarily social and community-based, but at this level
of discussion we should be looking at both social features and technical
ones.
YES YES YES!
However,
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Michael Snow wikipe...@frontier.com
wrote:
I also don't believe that social and technical aspects can always be
neatly separated. I'm guessing you don't either,
Correct, I don't.
I'm not looking to pull the discussion immediately toward the WMF's
strategic
This is an interesting topic about RecentChanges and its many uses and
variants. I'm copying Analytics, EE and Research lists because I hope that some
of our colleagues from these lists will hop over to Wikimedia-l to participate
in this discussion. [a]
In particular I would call my
15 matches
Mail list logo
