4:08 AM, "Anthony Cole" wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ah. Sorry Hilda, wrong term. I mean we should offer the reader a
> really
> >>>>> nice-looking presentation of the reviewed version of the article,
> rather
> >>>>> than som
about this, the less important I think it is. The
>>>>> main thing to achieve is a really prominent link at the top of the current
>>>>> version of a reviewed article linking the reader to the reviewed version.
>>>>>
>>>>> There should
want it.
>>>>
>>>> Whether they link to a nicely-presented, journal style edition or just
>>>> the plain old Wikipedia history page is fairly trivial.
>>>>
>>>> Apart from a really prominent link to the reviewed version at the top of
>
k to the reviewed version at the top of
>>> the current page, there should also be *a prominent link to a nice,
>>> readable diff between the reviewed and current versions* - so the
>>> reader can see how the topic/article has evolved since the last review.
>>>
&g
Bastian, Hilda (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] <
>> hilda.bast...@nih.gov> wrote:
>>
>>> G'day!
>>>
>>> I'm happy to support this - but can't come to London. Hoping to be at
>>> the USA meeting though.
>>>
>>> Not sure what you mean
; USA meeting though.
>>
>> Not sure what you mean by a fair copy.
>>
>> Hilda
>>
>>
>> --
>> *From:* Anthony Cole [ahcole...@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 18, 2015 9:48 PM
>> *To:* Wiki Medicine discussio
Great news! Well done!!!
Francesco Tarantini
(https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utente:Franciaio)
Il 14/08/15 19:05, Anthony Cole ha scritto:
>
> I've just come out of the second teleconference with fellow WPMEDF board
> member Jake Orlowitz, and Fiona Godlee and Peter Ashman of BMJ.
hony Cole [ahcole...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 18, 2015 9:48 PM
> *To:* Wiki Medicine discussion
> *Subject:* Re: [Wiki-Medicine] BMJ Wikipedia reviews
>
> Lodewijk, Sydney, Hilda, I think I'm going to need lots of support to pull
> this off. BMJ are not publishing th
cine discussion
Subject: Re: [Wiki-Medicine] BMJ Wikipedia reviews
Lodewijk, Sydney, Hilda, I think I'm going to need lots of support to pull this
off. BMJ are not publishing the reviewed version - we are, by pointing to the
relevant diff in the article's history. I'd like us to
Lodewijk, Sydney, Hilda, I think I'm going to need lots of support to pull
this off. BMJ are not publishing the reviewed version - we are, by pointing
to the relevant diff in the article's history. I'd like us to offer the
reader a much nicer presentation of the reviewed article than that, which
me
This fantastic news!
Sydney
Sydney Poore
User:FloNight
Wikipedian in Residence
at Cochrane Collaboration
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Anthony Cole wrote:
> I've just come out of the second teleconference with fellow WPMEDF board
> member Jake Orlowitz, and Fiona Godlee and Peter Ashman of
Wonderful news! Congratulations!
>
> Hilda
>
>
> From: Lodewijk
> Reply-To: Wiki Medicine discussion >
> Date: Friday, August 14, 2015 at 5:38 PM
> To: Wiki Medicine discussion
> Subject: Re: [Wiki-Medicine] BMJ Wikipedia reviews
>
> This is great news! This s
o: Wiki Medicine discussion
> Subject: Re: [Wiki-Medicine] BMJ Wikipedia reviews
>
> This is great news! This seamlessly fits in with some good discussions I've
> had/heard at Wikimania, and a good step towards the future!
>
> I hope that this experiment is successful, and that it
ikimedia.org>>
Subject: Re: [Wiki-Medicine] BMJ Wikipedia reviews
This is great news! This seamlessly fits in with some good discussions I've
had/heard at Wikimania, and a good step towards the future!
I hope that this experiment is successful, and that it finds repetition.
Lodewijk
On
This is great news! This seamlessly fits in with some good discussions I've
had/heard at Wikimania, and a good step towards the future!
I hope that this experiment is successful, and that it finds repetition.
Lodewijk
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Anthony Cole wrote:
> I've just come out of
15 matches
Mail list logo
