At present it's literally only me as wikimediaau-l list admin. This is less
than ideal, i.e. I can't guarantee any sort of consistent service.
It fell to me when everyone actually in Australia quit after some spurious
legal threats. So that's the threat model ...
Anyone want to volunteer as
On 18 March 2014 10:49, John Mark Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
While legal threats are banned on the wiki projects, the mailing lists
are managed differently, and there are differences in expectations of
behaviour (and dispute resolution) for the mailing lists.
Personally I'd consider
For now I've put the following text on the listinfo page:
Posters are expected to conduct themselves in a decorous manner
appropriate to a working list. Posters not doing so may be moderated
or removed. The list moderators' decision is final.
I'd expect personal attacks or legal threats would
On 18 March 2014 22:33, Lyle Allan lylea...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
Surely there should be a right of appeal. Just removing someone from a list
on the sayso of one person is something that should not be acceptable.
That's why a second admin would be an idea. OTOH, don't be a dick is
the
Steven's answer looked complete and apposite to me.
On 17 March 2014 12:49, Russavia russavia.wikipe...@gmail.com wrote:
Moving on, and bringing it back to what is important, Steven, can you please
address the questions which have been asked of you.
Cheers
Scotty
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014
On 16 March 2014 15:45, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
So I would suggest for the future (1) when kicking someone, say so and
why (unless there's a really good reason not to) (2) have a mix of
list admins.
I'll note also we have occasionally put people on moderation when
they're
On 16 March 2014 16:25, Russavia russavia.wikipe...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you possibly explain how John doing the RIGHT thing would be a wheel
war.
Personally I'd kick you both off and say so, but that's just speaking
as a third-party observer.
It's not a *right* to post to a Wikimedia list.
On 31 January 2013 04:39, Kerry Raymond kerry.raym...@gmail.com wrote:
I notice that all the ones I have looked at are labelled “no known copyright
restrictions”. Would that translate to {{PD-Australia}} for uploading to
Commons?
That's not a guarantee. You'd need to consider each one.
-
On 13 November 2011 06:09, Andrew Owens orderinchao...@gmail.com wrote:
One of the interesting opportunities arising from it is the possible
collaboration with Picture Joondalup, a CC (restricted :( ) licenced
collection of photos - mostly historical - that they've been building
themselves.
On 1 June 2011 03:22, Liam Wyatt liamwy...@gmail.com wrote:
1) I'd like to show them how Al Jazeera is publishing some of their footage
under cc-by and see whether ABC could feasibly do the same
http://cc.aljazeera.net/
Ye.
2) I'd like to see if the ABC News website would like to add
Are any of the GLAMs actually archiving their preciouss
high-resolution scans *offsite*?
- d.
___
Wikimediaau-l mailing list
Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l
John is part of Wikimedia Norway. What sort of thing do museum liaison
volunteers sell the idea of free to museums with? Please answer on
foundation-l :-)
- d.
-- Forwarded message --
From: John at Darkstar vac...@jeb.no
Date: 2009/7/13
Subject: [Foundation-l] GLAM and why use
On 11/07/2009, Andrew orderinchao...@gmail.com wrote:
Agreed with Gnangarra - I think if we approach them on agreeable terms and
recognise that they have needs too that need to be factored in, and that we
can fill them in on what we need and work out how that can be accommodated
as well, then
On 11/07/2009, private musings thepmacco...@gmail.com wrote:
This is rather important + serious stuff which relates to the 'GLAM' sector
- hopefully we'll be leading the way in ensuring good communication may help
resolve problems like this;
(basically a Commons user has received a legal
2009/4/30 Brian Salter-Duke b_d...@bigpond.net.au:
I would certainly support you doing this and I do not think it will be
disputed as the WMF and larger chatpers with more web presence have done
so. However, perhaps the committee needs to discuss it.
Most of the point of doing so is to do so
2009/1/29 YellowMonkey blnguyen2...@gmail.com:
I did use YellowMonkey I just didn't say my roles are.
Casliber and Chuq did the same
Yes, I saw that :-) You all did fine IMO.
- d.
___
Wikimediaau-l mailing list
2009/1/28 YellowMonkey blnguyen2...@gmail.com:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/01/28/2476045.htm
I went on the attack in the forum, although I didn't declare who I was
I suggest, in general, be open about who you are and what you do. (I
comment frequently on blog posts about
2009/1/16 Gnangarra gnanga...@gmail.com:
WM-au neds an ID system and if we want to be more serious some form of
accreditation system for photographers to attend these kind of thing. The
reason is that we are then establishing that the person is a member of the
association and that association
2009/1/12 Brianna Laugher brianna.laug...@gmail.com:
There's a nice piece by Max Barry (author of Jennifer Government) in
the Age, as well as on his blog, about how production companies using
copy protection is breaking their own DVDs and converting paying
customers into pirates.
outcome.
2008/12/10 Craig Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I really like this product, but maybe we should look at providing a
tweaked
version for Australian schools with more Australian topics (ie: less
American Presidents and more Australian Prime Ministers).
From: David Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED
2008/11/20 Stephen Bain [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Or lobby the government to have AUSPIC release the official headshots
that they take of all of them. I remember that someone asked them
about the pictures years ago but they wouldn't release them
themselves; it might be better to go to the government
21 matches
Mail list logo
