Re: [Wikimediaau-l] (no subject)

2010-08-16 Thread Confusing Manifestation
The reference to Julian Assange suggests that the poster is looking for Wikileaks - which is in no way associated with either Wikimedia Australia or the Wikimedia Foundation. I presume the best way to submit documents to Wikileaks is to go to Wikileaks (.org, in fact) and click on the great big

[Wikimediaau-l] Should we petition the pollies on copyright law?

2010-02-18 Thread Confusing Manifestation
Since the Ideascale site is now closed, I'll post my latest big idea here: One of the biggest gripes that Wikimedians and other open content fans have had in recent years is the issue of claiming copyright over retouched and/or digitised versions of public domain content. Since we would probably

[Wikimediaau-l] ABS CC survey

2009-12-25 Thread Confusing Manifestation
Apparently, it's been 1 year since the Australian Bureau of Statistics applied the Creative Commons license to all of its online content, and now they'd like to find out who's been making use of it. There's a survey on their website, so if anyone here has, for example, incorporated ABS data into

Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Friday March 20 Canberra brunch

2009-03-11 Thread Confusing Manifestation
As for a venue, I've heard good things about Milk and Honey (http://www.milkandhoney.net/milkandhoney/). I do apologise for being the one responsible for such an unsightly meeting time, but I'm actually going to Sydney that afternoon. I'm also excited to hear about contacts with these other

Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Innovative Ideas forum - National Library

2009-02-18 Thread Confusing Manifestation
things going on. However, I will keep you posted. CM 2009/2/18 Gnangarra gnanga...@gmail.com: You'll be in Perth that sounds like a good excuse for organising a meetup, do you have any time available? 2009/2/17 Confusing Manifestation confusingmanifestat...@gmail.com Oh great ... Seeing as I'll

Re: [Wikimediaau-l] 2008-11-09 ctte meeting minutes

2008-11-13 Thread Confusing Manifestation
This is what I was trying to get at. Hence why I said that the organisations who we'd work with wouldn't necessarily be donors (and probably often wouldn't, since then there wouldn't *be* any mixing of money and editing). And let's put it this way - would you rather us having a section on an