[Wikimediaau-l] wikimedia.org.au down?
I am wanting to show a prominent photographer whose work we host on Commons and use widely across Wikipedia projects information on the camera equipment grants, but it would appear that wikimedia.org.au is down, and has been for at least the last 12 hours. I don't want to show them the information that we need so that I can help them apply for the grant via Google cache; that would be embarrassing. Can we get an update on when the site will be available again please. Thanks. Russavia P.S. It would appear I am on moderation on this list, it's about time that this moderation is removed so that I can freely engage in discussion and not have to rely on David Gerard approving messages, thereby delaying things that will become timely in the near future if things I am working on come to fruition. ___ Wikimediaau-l mailing list Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l
Re: [Wikimediaau-l] CSIRO ScienceImage library now cc-by
Why not ask Fae to do it, he's a pro at stuff like this. I'll leave it up to you guys to reach out to him. On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Toby Hudson tob...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Peter / Liam, Did anyone make progress on this? I've finally had a look at some of the images, and we *definitely* want them on Commons. If nobody finds anything easier, I suppose I can start putting together a scraping script (but this may take me months at the rate I accumulate spare time). Toby On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Liam Wyatt liamwy...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Peter, that would be great if you would use your inside-contacts. Much quicker and also probably more effective than a cold-call! Ideally they could pro-actively give us a bulk dump with the metadata that they specifically wish - it gives them a greater sense of having contributed to Wikimedia rather than just 'allowing' us to scrape the website. The other thing is that the videos would all need mp4 - ogv conversion. This is not technically hard, but it is annoying. Perhaps you could see if there's someone you know inside the organisation who was responsible for that website who could help? Sincerely, -Liam wittylama.com Peace, love metadata On 7 May 2014 09:39, Peter Ansell ansell.pe...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Liam, I am currently working at CSIRO if that helps. Probably quickest to try getting in contact using the details at: http://www.scienceimage.csiro.au/pages/contact/ If that doesn't work I will contact my local PR person to see what we can do to get a bulk dump somehow. Cheers, Peter On 6 May 2014 10:24, Liam Wyatt liamwy...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Australian and GLAMtools lists, I read today on the Creative Commons Australia blog that CSIRIO's ScienceImage library has been re-licensed to CC-BY: http://creativecommons.org.au/blog/2014/04/csiro-releases-scienceimage-archive-4000-cc-by-photos-free-for-reuse/ [for non-Australians CSIRO is our national science/research institute]. This is a fabulous series of images, nearly all of which are useful in WP articles as they are taken for 'scientific' purposes which means they are easily usable as educational images. Take a look: http://www.scienceimage.csiro.au/ There's also over 500 documentary video files http://www.scienceimage.csiro.au/search/?tags=keyword=library=assettype=videorgb=deviation=30page=1 Here are the subject areas they've divided things up into: Animals birds fish marine life sheep Buildings laboratories radio telescopes Food fruits vegetables seafood Insects arachnids moths termites Landscapes deserts farms mountains People In the lab in the field Plants crops flowers trees Soil Science erosion mining soils Technology computers computer equipment Textile wool and woollen products Transportation boats Equipment industrial equipment laboratories Fire bushfire fire management Water irrigation lakes rivers Could someone on the GLAMWikiToolset users see if you can neatly extract these files to mass upload them to Commons? Equally, we could try to contact CSIRO directly? -Liam wittylama.com Peace, love metadata ___ Wikimediaau-l mailing list Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l ___ Wikimediaau-l mailing list Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l ___ Wikimediaau-l mailing list Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l ___ Wikimediaau-l mailing list Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l ___ Wikimediaau-l mailing list Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l
[Wikimediaau-l] Freopedia map
Hi all, Could we please get some further information on the Freopedia map[1] from the Committee of WMAU, or those involved in Freopedia. I would like to upload this map to Commons, and although I can see the Freopedia and Wikimedia Australia logos on the map, I can't find any licencing information. Information appreciated. Cheers, Russavia [1] https://archive.org/details/FreopediaTouristMap ___ Wikimediaau-l mailing list Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l
[Wikimediaau-l] Wiki Loves Monuments
Hi all, Does anyone know if there is going to be an Australian edition of Wiki Loves Monuments this year? The page is up on Commons,[1] but there's nothing there showing an Australian presence. Having an Aussie edition of the comp as a precursor, if there is still interest, in having a war memorials competition in the lead up to Anzac Day in 2015. Anyway, just wanting to put it out there that WLM is open and seeing if there is any interest in it. Cheers, Russavia [1] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2014 ___ Wikimediaau-l mailing list Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l
[Wikimediaau-l] Australian Aid relicences under CC-BY
Hi all, Following a request by myself, Australian Aid (under the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade) today relicenced their Flickr stream from (C) All Rights Reserved to CC-BY. Their stream can be found at https://www.flickr.com/photos/dfataustralianaid/ Their photos on Commons will be found at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Photographs_from_the_Department_of_Foreign_Affairs_and_Trade These photos are not only useful for showing the work of Australian Aid, especially in the Asia/Pacific region, but also for our bilateral relationships with other nations ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Bilateral_relations_of_Australia), and those nations themselves. If anyone would like to help to categorise these images, I have set up a temporary holding category at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Files_uploaded_by_Russavia_(DFAT)-- if categorising be sure to add the relevant bilateral relations category to the image (or create it if we don't already have) and remove the temporary category from the image, whilst leaving in place https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Files_uploaded_by_Russavia(this is my image upload tracking category). I do ask that anything relating to aviation not have the temporary category removed as I will have further categorisation relating to aviation to do on those images. I am indefinitely blocked on English Wikipedia, so I am not able to alert relevant WikiProjects (of which there are a few) as to the existence of these now freely licenced images, nor am I able to get images into use on that project, so this is going to be left up to others; but I would gander a guess that somewhere between 5-15% of images could be put into immediate use on en.wp, with other images which could be used to support creation of new content on that project possibly being in the 5-10% range. Cheers Russavia ___ Wikimediaau-l mailing list Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l
Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Apparently corrupt administration of this list
Moving on, and bringing it back to what is important, Steven, can you please address the questions which have been asked of you. Cheers Scotty On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Steven Zhang steven.zh...@wikimedia.org.au wrote: Hi all, Just to confirm, this was a deliberate removal and not a technical error. Two brief points here: 1. This was not a unilateral action that I took - it was a discussion that the committee had in its January meeting, and decided on as a whole, in addition to being a decision that was made between another list administrator and myself. WMF staff have also been consulted and had no issues with the action taken. 2. We welcome discussion about the organisation, and having differing opinions is perfectly fine, but actively disrupting the list is against both the rules and spirit of the list, and always has been. The former member concerned has engaged in repeated personal attacks on a number of individuals, and it had reached a point where we were receiving complaints from members, along with other members resigning from the organisation due to the conduct on the mailing list. This list amongst other things is intended for use as a method for Australian community members (including but not limited to Wikimedia Australia members) to collaborate and communicate. In practice most of that has been regarding activities of the chapter. In order for it to be used for those purposes, it needs to be a safe and constructive space. Admin action was taken only to ensure that this continued to be the case. As always, the committee encourages feedback and input wherever possible if it can be of benefit to the organisation, and if you as members have any questions or concerns we encourage you to discuss them with us. As an organisation over the past few years we have too often engaged in conflict with each other rather than work with each other, and it's something that we as a committee hope to change. Regards, -- Steven Zhang President - Wikimedia Australia steven.zh...@wikimedia.org.au On 16 March 2014 18:45, John Mark Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Sam Wilson s...@samwilson.id.au wrote: Yeah, Hanlon's razor perhaps should be remembered here! :-) Not that I mean to imply any incompetence on the part of the list administrators, but I do imagine that it's more likely that someone's made a mistake here and is not being actively mean. Unfortunately Tony's allegations are spot on. For background, Nathan Carter handed over the list admin to me in January 2013 when he needed to shift his load around. I added Charles Gregory as list admin in October 2013. Without consultation with me, Steven Zhang was added as list admin. I dont know when. Charles, did you add Steven as list admin, or was the WMF involved in that? I've quickly spoken with Steven about Tony being put on the kill list, and received confirmation both him and from Charles. They acted as a majority of list admins, without informing me, but with approval from the Wikimedia Australia committee and after discussion with a Wikimedia Foundation staff member. It seems it happened in January, in response to the emails Tony sent to the list in that month: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimediaau-l/2014-January/003979.html Steven Zhang was the person responsible for performing the kill list addition. I dont think that Tony's emails warranted this type of response. Putting a respected member of our community on a kill list will neither be particularly successful at silencing criticism, nor is the kill list the appropriate tool - moderation would have been the tool to use if Tony was being disruptive, and direct private discussion between Tony and moderators didn't result in a better path forward. Typically the kill list is used for spammers and people who are banned from Wikimedia projects and are being disruptive on the mailing lists. That does not apply to Tony. It is rude to take these types of moderator actions without informing the person involved, and informing other list admins even after the fact if the action needed to be taken quickly to maintain decorum on the list. Steven and Charles are a bit vague on the details of how this happened, so it is possible that not everyone who was consulted did actually agree to Tony being put on a kill list, and I hope most of them had envisaged that it was going to be implemented with with utmost care for a volunteer that they strive to serve and support. I hope the WMAU committee will give a more detailed explanation of their involvement in this. To everyone who did knowingly agree to Tony being put on a kill list: whether for incompetence, bad communication, or some other excuse - I dont care why - you _should_ be ashamed of yourselves. This is a good time to have someone else, outside of the current committee, step up to be list
Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Apparently corrupt administration of this list
Actually, he hasn't answered ANY questions that have been asked of him, either by myself, nor by Tony. His killing Tony's subscription because Tony has valid questions in relation to Andrew Owens' position on the Committee seems like a bit of a cover up, and a stupid attempt to silence a person who has valid concerns. I would suggest that at least those questions are answered, or I will contact the relevant regulatory authorities myself and lodge an official complaint. Scotty On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:02 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote: Steven's answer looked complete and apposite to me. On 17 March 2014 12:49, Russavia russavia.wikipe...@gmail.com wrote: Moving on, and bringing it back to what is important, Steven, can you please address the questions which have been asked of you. Cheers Scotty On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Steven Zhang steven.zh...@wikimedia.org.au wrote: Hi all, Just to confirm, this was a deliberate removal and not a technical error. Two brief points here: 1. This was not a unilateral action that I took - it was a discussion that the committee had in its January meeting, and decided on as a whole, in addition to being a decision that was made between another list administrator and myself. WMF staff have also been consulted and had no issues with the action taken. 2. We welcome discussion about the organisation, and having differing opinions is perfectly fine, but actively disrupting the list is against both the rules and spirit of the list, and always has been. The former member concerned has engaged in repeated personal attacks on a number of individuals, and it had reached a point where we were receiving complaints from members, along with other members resigning from the organisation due to the conduct on the mailing list. This list amongst other things is intended for use as a method for Australian community members (including but not limited to Wikimedia Australia members) to collaborate and communicate. In practice most of that has been regarding activities of the chapter. In order for it to be used for those purposes, it needs to be a safe and constructive space. Admin action was taken only to ensure that this continued to be the case. As always, the committee encourages feedback and input wherever possible if it can be of benefit to the organisation, and if you as members have any questions or concerns we encourage you to discuss them with us. As an organisation over the past few years we have too often engaged in conflict with each other rather than work with each other, and it's something that we as a committee hope to change. Regards, -- Steven Zhang President - Wikimedia Australia steven.zh...@wikimedia.org.au On 16 March 2014 18:45, John Mark Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Sam Wilson s...@samwilson.id.au wrote: Yeah, Hanlon's razor perhaps should be remembered here! :-) Not that I mean to imply any incompetence on the part of the list administrators, but I do imagine that it's more likely that someone's made a mistake here and is not being actively mean. Unfortunately Tony's allegations are spot on. For background, Nathan Carter handed over the list admin to me in January 2013 when he needed to shift his load around. I added Charles Gregory as list admin in October 2013. Without consultation with me, Steven Zhang was added as list admin. I dont know when. Charles, did you add Steven as list admin, or was the WMF involved in that? I've quickly spoken with Steven about Tony being put on the kill list, and received confirmation both him and from Charles. They acted as a majority of list admins, without informing me, but with approval from the Wikimedia Australia committee and after discussion with a Wikimedia Foundation staff member. It seems it happened in January, in response to the emails Tony sent to the list in that month: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimediaau-l/2014-January/003979.html Steven Zhang was the person responsible for performing the kill list addition. I dont think that Tony's emails warranted this type of response. Putting a respected member of our community on a kill list will neither be particularly successful at silencing criticism, nor is the kill list the appropriate tool - moderation would have been the tool to use if Tony was being disruptive, and direct private discussion between Tony and moderators didn't result in a better path forward. Typically the kill list is used for spammers and people who are banned from Wikimedia projects and are being disruptive on the mailing lists. That does not apply to Tony. It is rude to take these types of moderator actions without informing the person involved, and informing other list admins even after
Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Drama
Craig, Can you possibly explain how John doing the RIGHT thing would be a wheel war. If we were to apply on-wiki rules here, John undoing Steven's action would be normal practice. If Zhang were to come along and undo John's action, then this would be wheel warring. The exception to this is if Zhang were to do an admin action under authority of Arbcom, and John came along and undid. That would be wheel warring. Of course, you being an admin would know this, so I am unsure why you are totally misinterpreting what a wheel war is. God help anyone on en.wp who might come across your use of the tools if your lax understanding of basic concepts is like this in actual practice. No-one gave the WMAU committee authority over this list, and I expect Steven Zhang to answer the questions which have been raised of him. I would also expect, if he expects to remain an admin of this list, to undo the kill himself. This is an absolute disgrace that dissenting voices within this community are silenced, and that this silencing is done with the blessing (or at least the silence) of some in the community. This type of rubbish is what actually brings this community and our projects into disrepute. Scotty On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Craig Franklin cfrank...@halonetwork.netwrote: On 16 March 2014 19:18, wikimediaau-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org wrote: John, given that you were not involved in this and you have integrity, would you care to undo what Steven and Charles done to Tony. Cheers Scotty I trust that John has the good sense not to do the mailing list equivalent of getting involved in a wheel war. Cheers, Craig ___ Wikimediaau-l mailing list Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l ___ Wikimediaau-l mailing list Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l
[Wikimediaau-l] Jetstar relicences photos under CC-BY-SA
Hey all, I have been quite active in recent months in getting photos on Flickr relicenced, and have been quite successful in this. Aside from individual photographers, some of the organisations which have relicenced their photos after my request include Maersk Line, Austrian Airlines, Bahrain International Airport, Brussels Airport, Ecuadorian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Uri Tours (North Korean tour agency), amongst others. These photos are now on Wikimedia Commons. This morning, after months of persistence (using their words), Jetstar Airways, the Qantas low-cost subsidiary, kindly relicenced their photos on their Flickr stream at https://www.flickr.com/photos/jetstarairways/ from CC-BY-NC-SA to CC-BY-SA, thereby allowing the usage of their photos on Wikimedia projects. The airline has also changed its default licence so that future Flickr uploads will be CC-BY-SA. I have taken the liberty of uploading their stream to Wikimedia Commons and their photos are now available at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Photographs_by_Jetstar_Airways. There will, of course, be a lot of categorisation work and cleanup to be done on these images, which I will be getting done. I wanted to take this opportunity to publicly thank Jetstar for relicencing their photos and in turn supporting the free culture movement. Cheers Scotty ___ Wikimediaau-l mailing list Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l
Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Apparently corrupt administration of this list
Stephen, Charles and John, This obviously needs to be answered. If Tony has had his subscription cancelled/killed as he claims, this is a serious issue. As much as I think Tony is an a-grade twit, he has every right to his opinions on matters which relate to Wikimedia in Australia, no matter how much we disagree with them. I don't see John or Charles doing this, and I hope I am right in that, so it could only be Stephen Zhang as supposed by Tony. I hope I am wrong in this assertion, and am willing to be corrected on anything I am writing here. But Stephen, if this is correct, this is not only going to have ramifications for you as President of WMAU, but it is seriously going to affect your desire to become an admin on English Wikipedia, which is something that we all know you greatly desire. To have someone who is willing to use such a hammer on someone they disagree with as has occurred here, can not and should not be trusted with any tools on any project in which they have the ability to block editors. And I am sure that this will be referenced in any such request for adminship. This is an absolute disgrace, and some explanation is going to be required from those who have the ability to make such actions on this list. Cheers Scotty On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 9:01 PM, to...@iinet.net.au wrote: Dear subscribers I realised in early March that I'd been receiving no automatic email notifications from this public mailing list for some time. Curious, I made a post; it didn't get through. Then I went to the subscribe page and tried to join using my existing address, thinking there'd been some technical glitch that had unsubscribed me. Nope: every attempt to subscribe using the same email failed. I tried my alternate email, and that failed too. When a friend did it for me at a remote location, the alternate email was subscribed immediately. It is under that alternate address that I'm now posting. Through the marvel of human intuition, I think I've worked out that one of the three administrators, Steven Zhang, has placed my long-standing subscription on what is known as a kill list. I was never informed, and I can't imagine either Charles Gregory or John Vandenberg - the other two administrators - would have agreed to this undercover banning. I believe that both consulting the other administrators and informing the person being banned are standard protocol. I remind subscribers that the chapter doesn't own this mailing list: the WMF does. And I should also point out that under the by-laws I'm still a member of the chapter. I'd like an explanation. Tony Souter Normal email address: to...@iinet.net.au ___ Wikimediaau-l mailing list Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l ___ Wikimediaau-l mailing list Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l
Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Minutes of committee meetings and other queries
Do we have a secretary now that you can hand it into.please. On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Tony Souter to...@iinet.net.au wrote: Dear Andrew I am still a member because there was legally no secretary to receive my written resignation, as you correctly point out is required by Rule 6(1). Let's fast reverse for a moment: Charles resigned in writing as secretary several days *after* Graham was, somehow, appointed to the position, presumably using the casual vacancy rule—but there was no vacancy, so the appointment was invalid. I pointed out the problems at the time and was ignored—the fact that I was ignored is quite explicit in the minutes of the meeting during which everyone decided to appoint themselves into different office-bearing positions. http://www.wikimedia.org.au/wiki/Meeting:Committee_(2013-03-17)#Committee_reshuffle While we're on this matter, *Action:* Steven agreed to write up a formal re-shuffle motion, as per the email. – I see no evidence in subsequent minutes of such a a formal re-shuffle motion. It's as simple as that. You say: the committee will not be responding to your correspondence dated 25 January 2014; but you *have* responded. The failure to address my specific points might prompt members to wonder about several critical issues. Forgive me for being old-fashioned, but I'm rather fussy about adherence to rules and laws. Kind regards Tony On 25/01/2014, at 8:11 PM, Andrew Owens orderinchao...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Tony, On 1 October 2013, you resigned your membership per Rule 6(1) of the Association in writing, via a post to the chapter's lists. It is also on record that this resignation was accepted at the time. As such, you are not a member under the chapter's rules. As a consequence, the committee will not be responding to your correspondence dated 25 January 2014, and notes only that it contains several misunderstandings and errors of fact, some of which can be easily corrected with material already on the record, including reports submitted to the last AGM and the full text of the Associations Incorporation Reform Act 2012. Regards Andrew Owens Secretary Wikimedia Australia On 25 January 2014 13:17, Tony Souter to...@iinet.net.au wrote: Dear members Since under the chapter's rules I'm still a member of WMAU until 30 June—at which time no membership will be revewable for anyone under the rules, I'm sorry to say—may I ask whether the minutes of today's committee meeting will be posted promptly, unlike last time? Looking at the minutes of the most recent meeting (by the way, pretty short on links for members to navigate to referents), I see 12 red ACTION statements; only one of them is followed by a note that the action was taken: ACTION: Steven to advise Adam. (*Update: Actioned 25 November - committee members CC'd on email.*) Although it doesn't say whether the action succeeded in terms of the resolution. A sample of the other 11 is below, together with a few other queries. __ *ACTION: All to update COI register. Nope: http://www.wikimedia.org.au/w/index.php?title=Conflict_of_interest_policyaction=history __ *Update of records with CAV and the ACNC - Steven advised that everyone had sent through the necessary details. Email issues have hampered the ACNC matter; Steven is sending Andrew the form via express post. - The rule changes have not been sent to CAV from the SGM. If it goes beyond 26 November, the lodgment fee increases from $75.20 to $160.50. - ACTION: Steven to email Andrew the form; Andrew to file it with CAV on Tuesday. Even if the rule changes were sent to CAV by 26 November, saving the chapter half the fee, it ignores the fact that the law (not the rules, the law) was breached by not communicating the change within a month of the SGM that approved the changes. I believe there's a fine for that breach, but would need to check the Act to confirm this. __ *A7 Past resolutions - ACTION: Andrew to sort out past resolutions for posting to the public wiki. This cake looks worryingly half-baked: (add 2013-14, note out of date (will fill this in over coming week) http://www.wikimedia.org.au/w/index.php?title=Resolutionsaction=history __ **C4 Linkage project * there are questions as to its fit with our Statement of Purpose—I don't see an argument anywhere supporting this claim. Like the CAV's answers to questions by one committee member about compliance, the answers depend on how those questions are framed. Presumably the previous committee thought the project fit with the SoP. The current spending is authorised by a resolution of the previous committee, but we have the option to rescind this. But one of the problems in squibbing on this funding is that the chapter signed a *contract*with the other parties. Why sign a binding contract if you're going to
Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Meeting today..?
It's coming through all ok, I guess you are just being ignored. This is not good enough. On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Peter Musings thepmacco...@gmail.comwrote: anyone? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhiCFdWeQfA (could anyone receiving this just flick me a quick hello to confirm that the problem isn't the nut behind the keyboard this end...) best, Peter. PM. On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Peter Musings thepmacco...@gmail.comwrote: ping :-) Just wondering if I sent this ok? best, Peter, PM. On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Peter Musings thepmacco...@gmail.comwrote: hi folks, any news on minutes and the IRC log? best, Peter. PM. On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Steven Zhang cro0...@gmail.com wrote: Hi John, The minutes of the previous committee meeting are still forthcoming, and as Andrew has previously mentioned he has been unwell. We have not had our committee meeting this month to accept the minutes from the December meeting. Once this is done, they will be posted to the public wiki as is customary. I had a log of the meeting but it seems my IRC client creates it in a way so that converting it to text is impossible. I believe others may have a log and once I locate this it will be posted. Thanks for your patience. Steven Zhang On 12 Jan 2014, at 4:58 pm, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote: They havent been posted Steven. :( On Jan 12, 2014 9:27 AM, Steve Zhang steven.zh...@wikimedia.org.au wrote: Hi John, I believe the minutes are in the process of being finalized today and we have a copy of the irc log to post. It will be going ahead as planned today at 4pm AEDST. Steve On 12/01/2014 1:15 PM, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote: There are at least two items the committee should be attending to before the meeting today. The IRC log from the last public meeting should be published. The minutes from the last committee meeting should be published. fwiw, I am an apology for the meeting today, due to a prior commitment of being facilitator at a Wikidata workshop being here in Jakarta. -- John Vandenberg ___ Wikimediaau-l mailing list Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l ___ Wikimediaau-l mailing list Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l ___ Wikimediaau-l mailing list Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l ___ Wikimediaau-l mailing list Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l ___ Wikimediaau-l mailing list Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l ___ Wikimediaau-l mailing list Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l
