[Wikimediaau-l] Apparently corrupt administration of this list

2014-03-15 Thread tony2
Dear subscribers I realised in early March that I’d been receiving no automatic email notifications from this public mailing list for some time. Curious, I made a post; it didn’t get through. Then I went to the subscribe page and tried to join using my existing address, thinking

Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Apparently corrupt administration of this list

2014-03-16 Thread tony2
Dear subscribers I reply to comments in this thread: To Scott Bibby (Russavia): Thank you for your in-principle support; your argument was compelling and well expressed. However, I find the personal attack in public belittling and hurtful. Please note the recent Australian court judgement in which

Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Apparently corrupt administration of this list

2014-03-16 Thread tony2
Warning, Russavia: you are coming perilously close to being sued. Keep repeating your behaviour and I'll have no choice to be file a case. If the list administrators are prepared to accuse me without basis of making personal attacks while letting other members personally attack me, they will probab

Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Apparently corrupt administration of this list

2014-03-17 Thread tony2
None of my questions have been answered by the committee (or by David Gerard, who seems to think it's worth it to chime in without evidence) The critical questions are where I have been uncivil, "repeatably not respectingWikiquette", or "making personal attacks", according to Gideon (Gnangarra). Th

Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Apparently corrupt administration of this list

2014-03-17 Thread tony2
David Gerard: OK, so now "wikiquette" and "personal attacks" have morphed into "disruptive". Is that because you'd have trouble finding personal attacks or abuses of wikiquette among my posts to this mailing list? Where are they? You're making these accusations in a public forum, so we deserve to k

Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Apparently corrupt administration of this list

2014-03-17 Thread tony2
 I should have pointed out the legal situation to Russavia by private email – but I note that subscribers are not linked to any terms of use when they subscribe or post. That should be the minimum information if they're to be understood and taken seriously. Nor is the fact that the WMF owns/runs th

Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Apparently corrupt administration of this list

2014-03-18 Thread tony2
Steven, you don't put someone on moderation because they're asking uncomfortable questions. You provided no evidence of your accusations of "personal attack". It is very strange to try to shift WMAU members onto a secret mailing list after establishing this public list. I note that none of my unco