On 03/12/2011 07:08 PM, Ilario Valdelli wrote:
> On 12.03.2011 15:53, Emmanuel Engelhart wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> it seems that people are motivated by improving our Web site and also
>> maybe more. See last email from Manuel.
>>
>> I have tried in the past hour to understand better what wanted to be
>>
On 13.03.2011 15:50, Emmanuel Engelhart wrote:
Before any discuss I would invite you to read old emails and in
particular one of the President sent at least two years ago which
invited people of the community to participate in the creation of the
new website.
If someone doesn't remember, we ar
On 13.03.2011 16:36, Ilario Valdelli wrote:
> On 13.03.2011 15:50, Emmanuel Engelhart wrote:
> If someone doesn't remember, we are discussing to make a restyling of
> the web site already two years ago (http://www.wikimedia.ch/Refonte_du_site)
>
> This email has had no answer (also from the CIO).
I would put the accent in the fact that the web site is completely independent
from visual guidelines.
We have already visual guidelines:
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Wikimedia_visual_identity_guidelines
And we must respect them.
Probably someone has used a different name for a differen
On 13.03.2011 17:15, Ilario Valdelli wrote:
> We have already visual guidelines:
>
> http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Wikimedia_visual_identity_guidelines
This refers to the logo.
This is NOT a corporate design.
Btw. we are moving away from the original discussion. Emmanuel pointed
out th
On 13/03/2011 17:15, Ilario Valdelli wrote:
> I would put the accent in the fact that the web site is completely
> independent from visual guidelines.
I think you mean we can speak from the visual guidelines without
speaking from the web site... but the opposite is wrong. That is the
reason why y
On 13.03.2011 17:36, Emmanuel Engelhart wrote:
> Yes, that means:
> - developing a variation over the WMF guidelines.
> - this will become the WMCH visual guidelines
> - these guidelines has to be followed/implemented on all used media
> *also the web site*.
>
> Emmanuel
>
This means that we have v
On 13/03/2011 17:42, Ilario Valdelli wrote:
> On 13.03.2011 17:36, Emmanuel Engelhart wrote:
>> Yes, that means:
>> - developing a variation over the WMF guidelines.
>> - this will become the WMCH visual guidelines
>> - these guidelines has to be followed/implemented on all used media
>> *also the
On 13.03.2011 17:59, Emmanuel Engelhart wrote:
>
> So WMCH visual guidelines are exactly the same as the foundation.
> Not sure this this is the best approach to communicate on the swissness
> (like written in on the wiki)... but why not.
>
> Emmanuel
>
These are not the guidelines of foundation.
Dear all,
Following some emails recently sent concerning the website initiative, I
wanted to clarify a few points:
# 1: The idea of working on the website is not a new one. The first page
opened by the current Board on the public wiki dates back to April 2009.
# 2: In the newsletter (in four la
10 matches
Mail list logo