No, no.. Let me say that again and again, I passionately welcome the idea
that it is the genuinely interested people ( aka community) who should be
driving force of the chapter ! ( sincerely believe so and should be so). I
am more a community member at heart but I believe the chapter has to and
wi
Tinu,
I understand that we need more members to take the movement forward, but we
need to ensure that only genuinely interested people become a part of the
chapter.
Imagine this: Some comapny is unable to promote their product on Wikipedia.
Keeps getting deleted. [Read the mail I sent about Marketi
Thanks Srikanths for initiating this useful discussion.
Yes, we are all aware of the problem. But then again there are no straight
forward answers & solutions too.
Ironically it is a similar to the "chicken & egg problem". The chapter
needs the community to grow strong... The community will join t
+1 for recruiting more Wikipedian members.
I am one of those Wikipedians who hasn't become a member of the chapter
because i am hesitant to get involved in chapter politics and fear of being
forced to follow the agenda set by people who know nothing about Wikipedia
(except perhaps talking about it
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 19:01, CherianTinu Abraham wrote:
> I am very much in favour of ( sincerely wishes so) the active community
> members being part of the chapter and its leadership and taking the chapter
> is next level. The chapter will have lose its relevance unless the
> community takes co
Hi all,
I am very much in favour of ( sincerely wishes so) the active
community members being part of the chapter and its leadership and taking
the chapter is next level. The chapter will have lose its relevance unless
the community takes control of it and shape its future.
On a side note,
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 18:30, Jayanta Nath wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are some free and open source minded/Linux group
> members around Kolkata,They have some knowledge about Wikipedia's
> philosophy. Some of our community member wants joint on spot payment
> method,as like we have at WCI2011 . They
Hi,
There are some free and open source minded/Linux group
members around Kolkata,They have some knowledge about Wikipedia's
philosophy. Some of our community member wants joint on spot payment
method,as like we have at WCI2011 . They are not so comfortable with other
method.Although On-spot India
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 18:20, wrote:
> If this was done in Mumbai, why not allow it in Kolkata? I think there
> needs to be a uniform policy behind this - either its open to all at all
> our events across the country or its not.
>
My point was not specific to Kolkata. When i said 50,000 i didnt
all our events
across the country or its not.
Kind Regards,
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 18:14:34 +0530
From: parakara.gh...@gmail.com
To: wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] On the spot Chapter membership.
I agree with Srikanth.
Some people with vested interests may
I agree with Srikanth.
Some people with vested interests may want to join ...
-+-
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Srikanth Lakshmanan wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 15:39, Jayanta Nath wrote:
>
>> 1) On-spot *India Chapter membership* for visitors if they wish.
>>
>
> Was : Re: [Wikime
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 15:39, Jayanta Nath wrote:
> 1) On-spot *India Chapter membership* for visitors if they wish.
>
Was : Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Proposal: Wikipedia participation at 'Kolkata
Book Fair 2012'
I think we are going for numbers game here. Whats the point of on-spot
membership? S
12 matches
Mail list logo
