Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Magna Carta

2015-01-28 Thread Stevie Benton
Hello everyone, Just to pick this up again and assure you it hasn't fallen completely by the wayside. Parliament are running a project this year looking at several notable anniversaries. It's called Parliament in the Making https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliament_in_the_Making. They are also

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Magna Carta

2015-01-08 Thread Gordon Joly
On 05/11/14 11:04, Rod Ward wrote: An article in this weeks observer (see http://www.theguardian.com/culture/2014/nov/01/magna-carta-800-celebrates-anniversary ) points out that it will be the 800th anniversary of the signing of the Magna Carta next year (15 June 2015) and suggests there

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Magna Carta

2015-01-08 Thread Gordon Joly
On 08/01/15 09:45, geni wrote: Well if you are a commoner rather than a baron the charter of the forrest was signed in 1217 I know my place. Gordo ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Magna Carta

2015-01-08 Thread geni
On 8 January 2015 at 09:09, Gordon Joly gordon.j...@pobox.com wrote: So, the version to celebrate is that of 1297? See you all in 2097? Gordo Well if you are a commoner rather than a baron the charter of the forrest was signed in 1217 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charter_of_the_Forest

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Magna Carta

2015-01-02 Thread Peter Coombe
] *On Behalf Of *Richard Farmbrough *Sent:* 07 November 2014 19:50 *To:* UK Wikimedia mailing list *Subject:* Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Magna Carta There will be less demanding work, for example the signatories articles maybe could do with work. I just linked to [[Abbott of Peterborough]], only a few

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Magna Carta

2014-11-14 Thread Stevie Benton
*Sent:* 07 November 2014 19:50 *To:* UK Wikimedia mailing list *Subject:* Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Magna Carta There will be less demanding work, for example the signatories articles maybe could do with work. I just linked to [[Abbott of Peterborough]], only a few of those abbots have any

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Magna Carta

2014-11-14 Thread Jonathan Cardy
*To:* UK Wikimedia mailing list *Subject:* Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Magna Carta There will be less demanding work, for example the signatories articles maybe could do with work. I just linked to [[Abbott of Peterborough]], only a few of those abbots have any biographical details - VCH

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Magna Carta

2014-11-07 Thread
I have uploaded a few presentations and talks on video which would cheer up Magna Carta articles, some are quite 'non-academic friendly' for readers who might be daunted by a long encyclopaedia article (videos play back without having to leave a Wikipedia article). They are currently in

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Magna Carta

2014-11-07 Thread Richard Farmbrough
There will be less demanding work, for example the signatories articles maybe could do with work. I just linked to [[Abbott of Peterborough]], only a few of those abbots have any biographical details - VCH will supply plenty of useful information, typically more on the latter abbots. On 7

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Magna Carta

2014-11-07 Thread Rod Ward
] On Behalf Of Richard Farmbrough Sent: 07 November 2014 19:50 To: UK Wikimedia mailing list Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Magna Carta There will be less demanding work, for example the signatories articles maybe could do with work. I just linked to [[Abbott of Peterborough]], only a few of those

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Magna Carta

2014-11-06 Thread Andrew Gray
I'm not so sure. The article is 7000 words long, with densely-written and relatively technical content, and needs a comprehensive overhaul - it's the sort of thing that rewards work by one or two people with a good overview and a few days reading, rather than fifty people with small contributions.

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Magna Carta

2014-11-06 Thread Stevie Benton
That's a sensible point Andrew, thank you. How about we draw up a list of 50 articles we think are important and that need improving? We could use examples like Magna Carta as a hook to the story. We could even make this an annual thing. The Wikimedia Hitlist for 201x? Any thoughts? Stevie On 6

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Magna Carta

2014-11-06 Thread Edward Saperia
Calendar items - anniversaries and so on - are possible to plan in advance, and can be relevant to lots of different audiences. Our media pack wouldn't have to change that much, because it's all pretty similar on the Wikipedia end, just the subject changes. We might even be able to build something

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Magna Carta

2014-11-06 Thread HJ Mitchell
536971 Skype: harry_j_mitchell From: Stevie Benton stevie.ben...@wikimedia.org.uk To: UK Wikimedia mailing list wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: Thursday, 6 November 2014, 11:27 Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Magna Carta That's a sensible point Andrew, thank you. How about we draw

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Magna Carta

2014-11-06 Thread Richard Nevell
:* Thursday, 6 November 2014, 11:27 *Subject:* Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Magna Carta That's a sensible point Andrew, thank you. How about we draw up a list of 50 articles we think are important and that need improving? We could use examples like Magna Carta as a hook to the story. We could even make

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Magna Carta

2014-11-06 Thread HJ Mitchell
Thanks Fae. Those could be really useful. I'll have a look in the morning. (Btw can we take Fae of moderation now please; I think the point has been made.)  Harry Mitchellhttp://enwp.org/User:HJ Phone: +44 (0) 7507 536971 Skype: harry_j_mitchell From: Fæ fae...@gmail.com To: Harry Mitchell

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Magna Carta

2014-11-05 Thread Ed Saperia
PR opportunity? Wikipedia asks for contributors to bring Magna Carta article [link] up to highest standard [link to FA criteria] ahead of 800 year anniversary. The page currently gets over 150k views per month [link to pageview stats]. Never edited Wikipedia but keen on history? Here's some

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Magna Carta

2014-11-05 Thread Roberta Wedge
And then there's Tim Berners-Lee's call for a Magna Carta of internet rights, globally. He spoke of this at the Web We Want event https://webwewant.org/, which is another way of saying the same thing. It could all tie in quite nicely. *Roberta Wedge* *Gender Gap Project,

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Magna Carta

2014-11-05 Thread Jonathan Cardy
Dear Rod, We did indeed have a resident at the British Library, and some ongoing discussions and events with them, including an event last Friday. At the moment we are focussed on some large image releases and a major tagging exercise to identify old maps which will then be loaded on Commons.

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Magna Carta

2014-11-05 Thread Andrew Gray
Hi Rod, That was indeed me... we did do a bit of work with the BL MSS department (the great work was done before I came, though - John Byrne and his work on the Cuthbert Gospel). I think I could probably persuade someone to do a review and feedback, especially if we've done a chunk of the

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Magna Carta

2014-11-05 Thread Stevie Benton
Hello everyone, I really like Ed's point that this is a good PR opportunity. If anyone is interested in putting together some details and a potential media pitch that would be excellent! Thank you, Stevie On 5 November 2014 12:11, Jonathan Cardy jonathan.ca...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: Dear

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Magna Carta (John Byrne)

2014-11-05 Thread John Byrne
@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Magna Carta Message-ID: canx3ubke+gwghdomo+yu+nnsc2-dg_af5afqey56j8nmxy7...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Dear Rod, We did indeed have a resident at the British Library, and some ongoing discussions and events with them, including